Management of type-I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A 10-years prospective single centre study.


Journal

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1878-3562
Titre abrégé: Dig Liver Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100958385

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
received: 16 09 2021
revised: 12 11 2021
accepted: 15 11 2021
pubmed: 15 12 2021
medline: 30 6 2022
entrez: 14 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with type 1 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia (T1gNENs) treated with different endoscopic approaches. Patients were managed with endoscopic surveillance at regular intervals. Resection was performed by forceps or cold snare in tumours < 10 mm, otherwise mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD) were done. 127 T1gNENs, detected in 80 patients, were included. 87.4% of them were <5 mm, whereas 8.7% were 6-10 mm, 3.1% were 11-20 mm, and 0.8% was >20 mm. Ki67 <3%% was found in 85.8% tumours, whereas it was 3%-20% in the remaining 14.2% lesions. Noninterventional management (surveillance without radical resection) was performed in 15 patients (18.7%) with T1gNENs <5 mm. None of them underwent disease progression during follow-up. among the 65 patients treated by radical endoscopic resection, 37 patients (56.9%) had disease recurrence. 48.5% T1gNENs were removed by forceps, 16.8% by cold snare, 31.7% by EMR and 3% by ESD. The recurrence rate was similar among the different endoscopic techniques used. The management of T1gNENs may be planned based on tumour size. T1gNENs < 5 mm for which the initial removal is not radical could be followed up by noninterventional endoscopic surveillance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with type 1 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia (T1gNENs) treated with different endoscopic approaches.
METHODS
Patients were managed with endoscopic surveillance at regular intervals. Resection was performed by forceps or cold snare in tumours < 10 mm, otherwise mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD) were done.
RESULTS
127 T1gNENs, detected in 80 patients, were included. 87.4% of them were <5 mm, whereas 8.7% were 6-10 mm, 3.1% were 11-20 mm, and 0.8% was >20 mm. Ki67 <3%% was found in 85.8% tumours, whereas it was 3%-20% in the remaining 14.2% lesions. Noninterventional management (surveillance without radical resection) was performed in 15 patients (18.7%) with T1gNENs <5 mm. None of them underwent disease progression during follow-up. among the 65 patients treated by radical endoscopic resection, 37 patients (56.9%) had disease recurrence. 48.5% T1gNENs were removed by forceps, 16.8% by cold snare, 31.7% by EMR and 3% by ESD. The recurrence rate was similar among the different endoscopic techniques used.
CONCLUSIONS
The management of T1gNENs may be planned based on tumour size. T1gNENs < 5 mm for which the initial removal is not radical could be followed up by noninterventional endoscopic surveillance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34903498
pii: S1590-8658(21)00852-5
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.11.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

890-895

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Gianluca Esposito (G)

Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy; Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Maria Cazzato (M)

Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy; Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Maria Rinzivillo (M)

Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.

Emanuela Pilozzi (E)

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.

Edith Lahner (E)

Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy; Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Bruno Annibale (B)

Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy; Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Francesco Panzuto (F)

Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: fpanzuto@ospedalesantandrea.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH