Tailoring youth-friendly health services in Nigeria: a mixed-methods analysis of a designathon approach.
Journal
Global health action
ISSN: 1654-9880
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Action
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101496665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2021
01 Jan 2021
Historique:
entrez:
14
12
2021
pubmed:
15
12
2021
medline:
26
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Young people in low- and middle-income countries are often neglected in designing youth-friendly health services, especially HIV testing and preventive services. Designathons, which are time-bounded co-creation events where individuals gather in teams to develop solutions to a problem, could promote youth participation and ownership of health services. The purpose of this study is to examine youth participation in a designathon to create youth-friendly health services in Nigeria. Our designathon was based on crowdsourcing principles and informed by a human-centered design approach. The designathon included an open call for Nigerian youths between 14 and 24 years to share ideas on how to promote uptake of HIV self-testing services and a three-day sprint event that brought together diverse teams to develop strategies enhancing linkage to care. Teams pitched their solutions to a panel of five independent experts who scored ideas based on the desirability, feasibility, potential impact, and teamwork. We used descriptive statistics to summarize participants' demographics and conducted a content analysis to synthesize themes from youth proposals. Nine hundred seventy-six youth across Nigeria applied to join the designathon. Forty-eight youth in 13 teams participated in the designathon with a median age of 20 years (IQR: 17-22]. Boys and young men were 48.5% (446/919) of the total applicants, 62.5% (30/48) of the designathon participants, and 63.6% (7/11) of the finalists. Students, from all educational levels, represented 91.2% (841/922) of the total applicants, 88.4% (38/43) of the designathon participants, and 90.0% (9/10) of the finalists. About twenty-three percent (3/13) of the final proposals were top ranked. The three finalist approaches to optimize youth-friendly health services centered on decentralizing service delivery to young people through mobile health technologies, use of mobile tents, or peer support services. Our open call engaged diverse groups of Nigerian youth, including young women and students. Our data suggest that designathons may be useful for developing tailored youth-friendly health services. Further research is needed to understand the designathon process and the effectiveness of the finalist submissions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Young people in low- and middle-income countries are often neglected in designing youth-friendly health services, especially HIV testing and preventive services. Designathons, which are time-bounded co-creation events where individuals gather in teams to develop solutions to a problem, could promote youth participation and ownership of health services.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to examine youth participation in a designathon to create youth-friendly health services in Nigeria.
METHODS
METHODS
Our designathon was based on crowdsourcing principles and informed by a human-centered design approach. The designathon included an open call for Nigerian youths between 14 and 24 years to share ideas on how to promote uptake of HIV self-testing services and a three-day sprint event that brought together diverse teams to develop strategies enhancing linkage to care. Teams pitched their solutions to a panel of five independent experts who scored ideas based on the desirability, feasibility, potential impact, and teamwork. We used descriptive statistics to summarize participants' demographics and conducted a content analysis to synthesize themes from youth proposals.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Nine hundred seventy-six youth across Nigeria applied to join the designathon. Forty-eight youth in 13 teams participated in the designathon with a median age of 20 years (IQR: 17-22]. Boys and young men were 48.5% (446/919) of the total applicants, 62.5% (30/48) of the designathon participants, and 63.6% (7/11) of the finalists. Students, from all educational levels, represented 91.2% (841/922) of the total applicants, 88.4% (38/43) of the designathon participants, and 90.0% (9/10) of the finalists. About twenty-three percent (3/13) of the final proposals were top ranked. The three finalist approaches to optimize youth-friendly health services centered on decentralizing service delivery to young people through mobile health technologies, use of mobile tents, or peer support services.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our open call engaged diverse groups of Nigerian youth, including young women and students. Our data suggest that designathons may be useful for developing tailored youth-friendly health services. Further research is needed to understand the designathon process and the effectiveness of the finalist submissions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34904539
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1985761
pmc: PMC8676684
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1985761Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K24 AI143471
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R00 MH110343
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R25 MH080665
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG3 HD096929
Pays : United States
Références
Harv Bus Rev. 2008 Jun;86(6):84-92, 141
pubmed: 18605031
Afr J Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;21(2):26-34
pubmed: 29624937
Lancet. 2007 May 5;369(9572):1565-1573
pubmed: 17482988
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Nov 28;63(47):1097-103
pubmed: 25426651
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Mar 01;10(3):129-140
pubmed: 32610748
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 31;21(1):505
pubmed: 34059014
BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 11;13:220
pubmed: 23497196
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 17;42(12):239
pubmed: 30328518
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):92
pubmed: 29422062
Reprod Health Matters. 2013 May;21(41):57-68
pubmed: 23684188
Public Health. 2019 Aug;173:120-125
pubmed: 31271966
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e18343
pubmed: 32484444
Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):93-99
pubmed: 30456117
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233698
pubmed: 32469971
Cult Health Sex. 2009 May;11(4):453-67
pubmed: 19353391
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):298
pubmed: 32143666
AIDS. 2017 Jul 1;31 Suppl 3:S253-S260
pubmed: 28665883
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 27;8(2):e16030
pubmed: 32130189
BMJ. 2010 Aug 13;341:c4078
pubmed: 20709715