Development of an exercise programme for balance abilities in people with multiple sclerosis: a development of concept study using Rasch analysis.
Exercise
Exercise difficulty
Exercise therapy
Multiple sclerosis
Postural balance
Walking
Journal
Archives of physiotherapy
ISSN: 2057-0082
Titre abrégé: Arch Physiother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101688712
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Dec 2021
15 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
accepted:
26
10
2021
entrez:
15
12
2021
pubmed:
16
12
2021
medline:
16
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) frequently have impaired balance from an early stage of the disease. Balance difficulties can be divided into categories; although, to date, these lack scientific foundation. Impaired balance in PwMS can be addressed using specific and challenging exercises. Such exercises should provide an optimal challenge point; however, the difficulty of balance exercises is often unknown, making it difficult to target the exercises to an individual's abilities. The aims of this study were: to develop an exercise programme for PwMS relating the exercises to the balance problem categories; to establish the order of difficulty of exercises in each category and; to evaluate the content and structural validity of the exercise programme. A "construct map" approach was used to design and develop an exercise programme for PwMS. Potentially relevant balance exercises were identified, then a framework was set up, comprising four dimensions (subsequently reduced to three dimensions) of balance exercises. The relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness of the exercise programme were rated by 13 physiotherapists, who also linked 19 key exercises to balance categories. A total of 65 PwMS performed the 19 balance exercises, rated their difficulty and commented on the relevance and comprehensibility of each exercise. A Rasch model was used to evaluate the relative difficulty of the exercises. To assess fit of the data to the Rasch model a rating scale model was used, which is a unidimensional latent trait model for polytomous item responses. Evaluation by the physiotherapists and PwMS indicated that the content validity of the exercise programme was adequate. Rasch analysis showed that the latent trait "balance exercises in PwMS" comprised three subdimensions ("stable BOS", "sway" and "step and walk"). The 19 balance exercises showed adequate fit to the respective dimensions. The difficulties of the balance exercises were adequate to cover the ability spectrum of the PwMS. A balance exercise programme for PwMS comprising three dimensions of balance exercises was developed. Difficulty estimates have been established for each of the exercises, which can be used for targeted balance training. Content and structural validity of the programme was adequate.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) frequently have impaired balance from an early stage of the disease. Balance difficulties can be divided into categories; although, to date, these lack scientific foundation. Impaired balance in PwMS can be addressed using specific and challenging exercises. Such exercises should provide an optimal challenge point; however, the difficulty of balance exercises is often unknown, making it difficult to target the exercises to an individual's abilities. The aims of this study were: to develop an exercise programme for PwMS relating the exercises to the balance problem categories; to establish the order of difficulty of exercises in each category and; to evaluate the content and structural validity of the exercise programme.
METHODS
METHODS
A "construct map" approach was used to design and develop an exercise programme for PwMS. Potentially relevant balance exercises were identified, then a framework was set up, comprising four dimensions (subsequently reduced to three dimensions) of balance exercises. The relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness of the exercise programme were rated by 13 physiotherapists, who also linked 19 key exercises to balance categories. A total of 65 PwMS performed the 19 balance exercises, rated their difficulty and commented on the relevance and comprehensibility of each exercise. A Rasch model was used to evaluate the relative difficulty of the exercises. To assess fit of the data to the Rasch model a rating scale model was used, which is a unidimensional latent trait model for polytomous item responses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Evaluation by the physiotherapists and PwMS indicated that the content validity of the exercise programme was adequate. Rasch analysis showed that the latent trait "balance exercises in PwMS" comprised three subdimensions ("stable BOS", "sway" and "step and walk"). The 19 balance exercises showed adequate fit to the respective dimensions. The difficulties of the balance exercises were adequate to cover the ability spectrum of the PwMS.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
A balance exercise programme for PwMS comprising three dimensions of balance exercises was developed. Difficulty estimates have been established for each of the exercises, which can be used for targeted balance training. Content and structural validity of the programme was adequate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34906261
doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00120-3
pii: 10.1186/s40945-021-00120-3
pmc: PMC8672542
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
29Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Oct;44(10):811-23
pubmed: 22990349
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e107620
pubmed: 25254633
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Jul;26(7):579-93
pubmed: 21984532
Mult Scler. 2013 Dec;19(14):1913-22
pubmed: 23633067
J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24
pubmed: 15130871
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jul;93(7):1209-16
pubmed: 22521926
Neurol Res. 2006 Jul;28(5):555-62
pubmed: 16808889
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Mult Scler. 2006 Oct;12(5):620-8
pubmed: 17086909
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170
pubmed: 29550964
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1274-9; quiz 1287
pubmed: 16935067
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):13
pubmed: 30642252
Mult Scler. 2015 Jan;21(1):92-100
pubmed: 24948687
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;159:237-250
pubmed: 30482317
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct;96(10):1898-912
pubmed: 26070975
Mult Scler Int. 2014;2014:109142
pubmed: 24575302
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Sep;21(9):771-81
pubmed: 17875557
Mult Scler. 2012 May;18(5):622-7
pubmed: 22020418
Somatosens Mot Res. 2008;25(2):113-22
pubmed: 18570015
Neurosci Lett. 2012 Aug 30;524(2):124-8
pubmed: 22824302
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jun;89(6):1031-7
pubmed: 18503796
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):178-194
pubmed: 29881087
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Sep;32(9):1220-1234
pubmed: 29651873
J Biomech. 2000 Mar;33(3):387-92
pubmed: 10673124
Clin Rehabil. 2013 Sep;27(9):813-22
pubmed: 23543341
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1382-1414
pubmed: 26833314
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2010 Sep;10(5):407-12
pubmed: 20567946
Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):504-13
pubmed: 23237970
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Aug;51(4):429-37
pubmed: 25653078
Mult Scler. 2018 Jun;24(7):995-998
pubmed: 28920765
J Outcome Meas. 1998;2(3):266-83
pubmed: 9711024
J Appl Meas. 2002;3(1):85-106
pubmed: 11997586
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28021
pubmed: 22132196
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 May 29;8:33
pubmed: 18510722
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179
pubmed: 29260445
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Mar;28(3):254-63
pubmed: 23983091