SERV-CT: A disparity dataset from cone-beam CT for validation of endoscopic 3D reconstruction.
CT validation
Computer-assisted interventions
Stereo 3D reconstruction
Surgical endoscopy
Journal
Medical image analysis
ISSN: 1361-8423
Titre abrégé: Med Image Anal
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9713490
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
18
12
2020
revised:
01
11
2021
accepted:
04
11
2021
pubmed:
16
12
2021
medline:
8
4
2022
entrez:
15
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In computer vision, reference datasets from simulation and real outdoor scenes have been highly successful in promoting algorithmic development in stereo reconstruction. Endoscopic stereo reconstruction for surgical scenes gives rise to specific problems, including the lack of clear corner features, highly specular surface properties and the presence of blood and smoke. These issues present difficulties for both stereo reconstruction itself and also for standardised dataset production. Previous datasets have been produced using computed tomography (CT) or structured light reconstruction on phantom or ex vivo models. We present a stereo-endoscopic reconstruction validation dataset based on cone-beam CT (SERV-CT). Two ex vivo small porcine full torso cadavers were placed within the view of the endoscope with both the endoscope and target anatomy visible in the CT scan. Subsequent orientation of the endoscope was manually aligned to match the stereoscopic view and benchmark disparities, depths and occlusions are calculated. The requirement of a CT scan limited the number of stereo pairs to 8 from each ex vivo sample. For the second sample an RGB surface was acquired to aid alignment of smooth, featureless surfaces. Repeated manual alignments showed an RMS disparity accuracy of around 2 pixels and a depth accuracy of about 2 mm. A simplified reference dataset is provided consisting of endoscope image pairs with corresponding calibration, disparities, depths and occlusions covering the majority of the endoscopic image and a range of tissue types, including smooth specular surfaces, as well as significant variation of depth. We assessed the performance of various stereo algorithms from online available repositories. There is a significant variation between algorithms, highlighting some of the challenges of surgical endoscopic images. The SERV-CT dataset provides an easy to use stereoscopic validation for surgical applications with smooth reference disparities and depths covering the majority of the endoscopic image. This complements existing resources well and we hope will aid the development of surgical endoscopic anatomical reconstruction algorithms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34906918
pii: S1361-8415(21)00347-9
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102302
pmc: PMC8961000
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102302Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 203145Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Odin Vision Ltd. Digital Surgery.
Références
Med Image Anal. 2018 Aug;48:230-243
pubmed: 29990688
Med Image Anal. 2019 Feb;52:24-41
pubmed: 30468970
J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1314-1320
pubmed: 29048214
Sci Data. 2021 Apr 12;8(1):101
pubmed: 33846356
Med Phys. 2012 Mar;39(3):1632-45
pubmed: 22380395
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Jul;14(7):1167-1176
pubmed: 30989505
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16(Pt 1):42-9
pubmed: 24505647
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Oct;33(10):1913-30
pubmed: 24876109
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):456-461
pubmed: 27129565
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Jul;15(7):1075-1084
pubmed: 32436132
Med Image Anal. 2017 Apr;37:66-90
pubmed: 28160692
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jan;38(1):79-89
pubmed: 30010552
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Br J Surg. 2021 Sep 27;108(9):1056-1063
pubmed: 33761533
Med Image Anal. 2013 Dec;17(8):974-96
pubmed: 23837969
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Oct;14(5):e1926
pubmed: 29968295
Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):266-73
pubmed: 24149104
World J Urol. 2020 Sep;38(9):2167-2176
pubmed: 30826888
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Jul;12(7):1089-1099
pubmed: 28508345
Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Feb;40(2):332-45
pubmed: 22012086
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010 Mar;5(2):133-41
pubmed: 20033519
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Jan;33(1):135-46
pubmed: 24107925
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019 Jan;28(1):31-44
pubmed: 30414680
Int J Med Robot. 2016 Jun;12(2):158-78
pubmed: 25931190
Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Mar;28(2):205-213
pubmed: 29278582
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Jun;13(6):865-874
pubmed: 29663273
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2019 Oct;11764:339-347
pubmed: 32391525
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2010;13(Pt 1):275-82
pubmed: 20879241