Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials.
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 12 2021
14 12 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
12
2021
pubmed:
16
12
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine the effectiveness of sending Christmas cards to participants in randomised controlled trials to increase retention rate at follow-ups, and to explore the feasibility of doing a study within a trial (SWAT) across multiple host trials simultaneously. Randomised SWAT conducted simultaneously across eight host trials. Eight randomised controlled trials researching various areas including surgery and smoking cessation. 3223 trial participants who were still due at least one follow-up from their host randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomised (1:1, separately by each host trial) to either received a Christmas card in mid-December 2019 or to not receive a card. Proportion of participants completing their next follow-up (retention rate) within their host randomised controlled trial. 1469 participants (age 16-94 years; 70% (n=1033) female; 96% (813/847) white ethnicity) across the eight host randomised controlled trials were involved in the analysis (cut short owing to covid-19). No evidence was found of a difference in retention rate between the two arms for any of the host trials when analysed separately or when the results were combined (85.3% (639/749) for cards versus 85.4% (615/720) for no card; odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.29; P=0.77). No difference was observed when comparing just participants who were due a follow-up in the 30 days after receiving the card (odds ratio 0.96, 0.42 to 2.21). No evidence of a difference in time to complete the questionnaire was found (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.13; P=0.80). These results were robust to post hoc sensitivity analyses. The cost of this intervention was £0.76 (€0.91; $1.02) per participant, and it will have a carbon footprint of approximately 140 g CO Sending Christmas cards to participants in randomised controlled trials does not increase retention. Undertaking a SWAT within multiple randomised controlled trials at the same time is, however, possible. This approach should be used more often to build an evidence base to support selection of recruitment and retention strategies. Although no evidence of a boost to retention was found, embedding a SWAT in multiple host trials simultaneously has been shown to be possible. SWAT repository https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/TheNorthernIrelandNetworkforTrialsMethodologyResearch/FileStore/Filetoupload,846275,en.pdf#search=SWAT%2082.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34906985
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067742
pmc: PMC8669570
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e067742Subventions
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : HSRU2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R013748/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: funding from the MRC PROMETHEUS programme to support this work; no financial relationship with any organisation that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e015276
pubmed: 28320800
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 6;3:MR000032
pubmed: 33675536
Trials. 2020 Feb 14;21(1):183
pubmed: 32059684
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 25;11(3):e039781
pubmed: 33766835
BMJ. 2015 Sep 25;351:h4923
pubmed: 26408289
Trials. 2014 Oct 16;15:399
pubmed: 25322807
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:35-41
pubmed: 32027931
Trials. 2020 Jun 4;21(1):479
pubmed: 32498699
Trials. 2018 Feb 23;19(1):139
pubmed: 29475444
Trials. 2014 Oct 25;15:407
pubmed: 25344684
Trials. 2017 Aug 31;18(1):406
pubmed: 28859674
Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):33
pubmed: 31910861