A synthesis and future research directions for tropical mountain ecosystem restoration.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 12 2021
14 12 2021
Historique:
received:
05
10
2021
accepted:
22
10
2021
entrez:
15
12
2021
pubmed:
16
12
2021
medline:
16
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many tropical mountain ecosystems (TME) are severely disturbed, requiring ecological restoration to recover biodiversity and ecosystem functions. However, the extent of restoration efforts across TMEs is not known due to the lack of syntheses on ecological restoration research. Here, based on a systematic review, we identify geographical and thematic research gaps, compare restoration interventions, and consolidate enabling factors and barriers of restoration success. We find that restoration research outside Latin-America, in non-forested ecosystems, and on socio-ecological questions is scarce. For most restoration interventions success is mixed and generally limited by dispersal and microhabitat conditions. Finally, we propose five directions for future research on tropical mountain restoration in the UN decade of restoration, ranging from scaling up restoration across mountain ranges, investigating restoration in mountain grasslands, to incorporating socio-economic and technological dimensions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34907235
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03205-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-03205-y
pmc: PMC8671388
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23948Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Rev Biol Trop. 2011 Dec;59(4):1883-94
pubmed: 22208100
Ecol Appl. 2010 Jul;20(5):1255-69
pubmed: 20666248
Ecol Appl. 2016 Jan;26(1):203-18
pubmed: 27039520
Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7735):207-212
pubmed: 30429613
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):9635-9640
pubmed: 28827340
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0171368
pubmed: 28158256
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 14;4(12):e8273
pubmed: 20011603
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Apr;27(7):1328-1348
pubmed: 33494123
Front Plant Sci. 2014 May 20;5:200
pubmed: 24904602
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 1;702:134581
pubmed: 31734614
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Apr;27(8):1518-1546
pubmed: 33522071
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0190003
pubmed: 29320520
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):E6084
pubmed: 26508625
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7750):88-92
pubmed: 30918402
Nature. 2015 Aug 20;524(7565):347-50
pubmed: 26266979
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111759
pubmed: 33298397
MethodsX. 2019 Dec 19;7:100777
pubmed: 31993339
Conserv Biol. 2009 Apr;23(2):400-9
pubmed: 19040649
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e63634
pubmed: 23667651
New Phytol. 2016 Jul;211(2):489-501
pubmed: 27038126
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0213155
pubmed: 30995232
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jan;20(1):203-15
pubmed: 23966269
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48908
pubmed: 23185283
Science. 2004 Sep 24;305(5692):1915-6
pubmed: 15448256
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Jan;36(1):20-28
pubmed: 32958364
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 1;702:134802
pubmed: 31733551
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 28;362(1478):263-72
pubmed: 17255035