Clinical presentation and treatment response in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis during a 40-week follow-up.
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT
Polymyalgia rheumatica
giant cell arteritis
temporal artery biopsy
treatment response
Journal
Rheumatology advances in practice
ISSN: 2514-1775
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Adv Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101736676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
31
07
2021
accepted:
09
11
2021
entrez:
15
12
2021
pubmed:
16
12
2021
medline:
16
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim was to study the clinical features of PMR/GCA and clinical predictors of treatment response during a 40-week follow-up period. Clinical data on 77 patients with newly diagnosed PMR/GCA who were treated with oral glucocorticoids were gathered at baseline and during a 40-week follow-up period. A unilateral temporal artery biopsy (TAB) and Of 77 patients [49 (63.6%) female; mean age 71.8 (8.0) years], 64 (83.1%) patients had pure PMR, 10 (13.0%) concomitant PMR and GCA, and 3 (3.9%) pure GCA. The patients reported that clinical symptoms, apart from scalp pain and duration of morning stiffness, improved significantly at week 4 and remained lower at week 40 compared with the relative frequencies at baseline. Besides, all components of physical examination showed significant improvement and remained lower at week 40 compared with the baseline. A complete response was seen in 68.7, 62.9, 44.1 and 33.3% of patients at weeks 4, 16, 28 and 40, respectively. Several clinical features, including female biological sex, younger age, fewer relapses and a lower level of baseline ESR, were significantly associated with a better treatment response. Treatment response during the follow-up period was independent of TAB results and fluorodeoxyglucose uptakes on Obtaining valid disease-specific outcome measures for evaluating treatment efficacy in PMR and GCA that can be applied universally is clearly an unmet clinical need. ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02985424.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34909566
doi: 10.1093/rap/rkab091
pii: rkab091
pmc: PMC8665449
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02985424']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
rkab091Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
Références
Br J Radiol. 2017 Aug;90(1076):20170198
pubmed: 28508663
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(26):e7297
pubmed: 28658131
J Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;44(10):1515-1521
pubmed: 28765246
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328
pubmed: 28745999
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Oct;74(10):1799-807
pubmed: 26359488
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jul 25;347(4):261-71
pubmed: 12140303
BMJ. 1997 May 3;314(7090):1329-32
pubmed: 9158471
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;16(9):481-495
pubmed: 32759996
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 04;9(12):
pubmed: 33291857
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;17(3):185-186
pubmed: 33257870
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Oct;63(10):1279-83
pubmed: 15361387
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jun 15;57(5):803-9
pubmed: 17530680
J Rheumatol. 2012 Apr;39(4):795-803
pubmed: 22422492
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Aug;2(8):478-490
pubmed: 33439554
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Nov 1;57(11):1881-1882
pubmed: 29340627
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):130-6
pubmed: 18021518
PLoS One. 2015 May 08;10(5):e0126758
pubmed: 25955770
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Oct 05;17:254
pubmed: 26435495