A case report of pulmonary vein isolation performed in a patient with polysplenia and interrupted inferior vena cava.

Atrial fibrillation Case report Needle stiletto Pulmonary vein isolation Superior vena cava approach to PVI

Journal

European heart journal. Case reports
ISSN: 2514-2119
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101730741

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 26 04 2021
revised: 18 05 2021
accepted: 15 11 2021
entrez: 15 12 2021
pubmed: 16 12 2021
medline: 16 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has entrenched itself as one of the main approaches for the treatment of paroxysmal symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation prevents focal triggers from pulmonary veins from initiating AF paroxysms. As standard-PVI is performed through the inferior vena cava (IVC) approach, through the femoral vein. However, there are conditions when this approach is not appropriate or is not available. We report a case of a 53-year-old male who was referred to Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital for PVI due to worsening AF. Due to the rare anatomical variant of the venous system, the standard approach to PVI could not be applied. Interrupted cava inferior did not allow for femoral vein and IVC access. We had to figure out a different path-a combination of internal jugular and subclavian veins was used. Transseptal puncture was performed under transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) control with a puncture needle stiletto. Pulmonary veins were isolated successfully, no complications were observed, and the patient was discharged in sinus rhythm. In some patients, PVI cannot be done through the standard IVC approach. In such cases, a different venous access must be chosen. Our patient had a rare variant of interrupted IVC and we had to use superior vena cava approach for the procedure. The difficulty of this approach is that procedure instruments are not designed for non-standard venous access; however, a combined use of TOE, general anaesthesia, and contact force-guided ablation has succeeded in isolating patients' pulmonary veins.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has entrenched itself as one of the main approaches for the treatment of paroxysmal symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation prevents focal triggers from pulmonary veins from initiating AF paroxysms. As standard-PVI is performed through the inferior vena cava (IVC) approach, through the femoral vein. However, there are conditions when this approach is not appropriate or is not available.
CASE SUMMARY METHODS
We report a case of a 53-year-old male who was referred to Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital for PVI due to worsening AF. Due to the rare anatomical variant of the venous system, the standard approach to PVI could not be applied. Interrupted cava inferior did not allow for femoral vein and IVC access. We had to figure out a different path-a combination of internal jugular and subclavian veins was used. Transseptal puncture was performed under transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) control with a puncture needle stiletto. Pulmonary veins were isolated successfully, no complications were observed, and the patient was discharged in sinus rhythm.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
In some patients, PVI cannot be done through the standard IVC approach. In such cases, a different venous access must be chosen. Our patient had a rare variant of interrupted IVC and we had to use superior vena cava approach for the procedure. The difficulty of this approach is that procedure instruments are not designed for non-standard venous access; however, a combined use of TOE, general anaesthesia, and contact force-guided ablation has succeeded in isolating patients' pulmonary veins.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34909574
doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab480
pii: ytab480
pmc: PMC8665676
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

ytab480

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Références

J Electrocardiol. 2019 Jul - Aug;55:78-86
pubmed: 31152995
J Atr Fibrillation. 2019 Jun 30;12(1):2106
pubmed: 31687063
Europace. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):1227-1232
pubmed: 27174901
Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 Dec;103(12):1028-30
pubmed: 25085268
Neth Heart J. 2015 Jul;23(7-8):368-9
pubmed: 26017889
Heart Vessels. 2018 Oct;33(10):1238-1244
pubmed: 29637262
J Atr Fibrillation. 2014 Apr 30;6(6):1039
pubmed: 27957061
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;4(2):235-41
pubmed: 21270102
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498
pubmed: 32860505
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020 Jan 09;6(4):210-214
pubmed: 32322499

Auteurs

Kaspars Kupics (K)

Latvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Pilsonu iela 13, Riga LV-1002, Latvia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 3, Riga LV-1004, Latvia.

Kristine Jubele (K)

Latvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Pilsonu iela 13, Riga LV-1002, Latvia.
Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga LV-1007, Latvia.

Georgijs Nesterovics (G)

Latvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Pilsonu iela 13, Riga LV-1002, Latvia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 3, Riga LV-1004, Latvia.

Andrejs Erglis (A)

Latvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Pilsonu iela 13, Riga LV-1002, Latvia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 3, Riga LV-1004, Latvia.

Classifications MeSH