Envisioning a resilient future for biodiversity conservation in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
SARS‐CoV‐2
coronavirus
human–wildlife interactions
shocks
social–ecological systems
sustainability
tourism
zoonotic transmission
Journal
People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)
ISSN: 2575-8314
Titre abrégé: People Nat (Hoboken)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768930
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
accepted:
07
08
2021
entrez:
15
12
2021
pubmed:
16
12
2021
medline:
16
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect societies across the world, the ongoing economic and social disruptions are likely to present fundamental challenges for current and future biodiversity conservation.We review the literature for outcomes of past major societal, political, economic and zoonotic perturbations on biodiversity conservation, and demonstrate the complex implications of perturbation events upon conservation efforts. Building on the review findings, we use six in-depth case studies and the emerging literature to identify positive and negative outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic, known and anticipated, for biodiversity conservation efforts around the world.A number of similarities exist between the current pandemic and past perturbations, with experiences highlighting that the pandemic-induced declines in conservation revenue and capacity, livelihood and trade disruptions are likely to have long-lasting and negative implications for biodiversity and conservation efforts.Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic also brought about a global pause in human movement that is unique in recent history, and may yet foster long-lasting behavioural and societal changes, presenting opportunities to strengthen and advance conservation efforts in the wake of the pandemic. Enhanced collaborations and partnerships at the local level, cross-sectoral engagement, local investment and leadership will all enhance the resilience of conservation efforts in the face of future perturbations. Other actions aimed at enhancing resilience will require fundamental institutional change and extensive government and public engagement and support if they are to be realised.The pandemic has highlighted the inherent vulnerabilities in the social and economic models upon which many conservation efforts are based. In so doing, it presents an opportunity to reconsider the status quo for conservation, and promotes behaviours and actions that are resilient to future perturbation. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34909607
doi: 10.1002/pan3.10262
pii: PAN310262
pmc: PMC8661774
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
990-1013Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Microorganisms. 2021 Feb 19;9(2):
pubmed: 33669805
Biol Conserv. 2020 Jun;246:108571
pubmed: 32292203
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Oct;20(4):660-94
pubmed: 17934078
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep;4(9):1156-1159
pubmed: 32572222
World Dev. 2020 Dec;136:105121
pubmed: 32834392
Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):834-7
pubmed: 14634671
Lancet. 2012 Dec 1;380(9857):1956-65
pubmed: 23200504
Anim Conserv. 2020 May 27;:
pubmed: 32837242
Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4 Suppl):e10-20
pubmed: 20048675
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Nov;10(11):1900-6
pubmed: 15550198
Aquat Conserv. 2020 Jun;30(6):1061-1062
pubmed: 32834706
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 21;10(12):
pubmed: 33371486
Biol Conserv. 2021 Mar;255:109001
pubmed: 34565806
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jun 5;372(1722):
pubmed: 28438911
Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):990-3
pubmed: 18288193
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Sep;26(9):4651-4653
pubmed: 32479657
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Sep 1;101(3-4):148-56
pubmed: 20832879
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):
pubmed: 32532012
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;20(10):1753-7
pubmed: 25401183
Biol Conserv. 2020 Aug;248:108650
pubmed: 32542058
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):844-53
pubmed: 25581070
People Nat (Hoboken). 2021 Jun;3(3):518-527
pubmed: 34230912
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 10;695:133874
pubmed: 31756872
Biol Lett. 2007 Jun 22;3(3):299-301
pubmed: 17360251
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec;35(12):1052-1055
pubmed: 33097287
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 19;372(1725):
pubmed: 28584175
Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2020 Oct;46:35-38
pubmed: 33014191
Biol Conserv. 2020 Aug;248:108665
pubmed: 32549587
PeerJ. 2020 Nov 17;8:e10283
pubmed: 33240628
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct;4(10):1300-1310
pubmed: 32728187
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jun 5;372(1722):
pubmed: 28438915
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 12;109(24):9483-6
pubmed: 22645346
Aquat Conserv. 2020 Nov 25;:
pubmed: 33362396
Science. 2020 Aug 21;369(6506):929
pubmed: 32820118
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 24;5:9405
pubmed: 25802117
Biol Lett. 2007 Oct 22;3(5):483-6
pubmed: 17698449
Integr Zool. 2014 Jun;9(3):376-8
pubmed: 24952972
Commun Biol. 2020 Oct 27;3(1):641
pubmed: 33110195
Biol Conserv. 2021 Feb;254:108952
pubmed: 33518772
Sci Rep. 2012;2:570
pubmed: 22880161
Health Phys. 2000 Dec;79(6):682-90
pubmed: 11089805
Science. 2020 Jul 24;369(6502):413-422
pubmed: 32532802
Zoonoses Public Health. 2017 Dec;64(8):628-635
pubmed: 28371424
J Wildl Manage. 2020 Aug 26;:
pubmed: 32904967
Biol Conserv. 2020 Sep;249:108728
pubmed: 32863391
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun 22;7(15):5873-5890
pubmed: 28811887
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Jun;4(6):e219
pubmed: 32559437
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar;5(3):264
pubmed: 33398107
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4971
pubmed: 32188909
Environ Entomol. 2007 Aug;36(4):817-25
pubmed: 17716472
Biol Conserv. 2021 May;257:109038
pubmed: 34580547