The T-cell clonal response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients is augmented by anti-TNF therapy and often deficient in antibody-responders.
Journal
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Dec 2021
08 Dec 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
12
2021
pubmed:
16
12
2021
medline:
16
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is a highly effective strategy to protect against infection, which is predominantly mediated by vaccine-induced antibodies. Postvaccination antibodies are robustly produced by those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) even on immune-modifying therapies but are blunted by anti-TNF therapy. In contrast, T-cell response which primarily determines long-term efficacy against disease progression,, is less well understood. We aimed to assess the post-vaccination T-cell response and its relationship to antibody responses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immune-modifying therapies. We evaluated IBD patients who completed SARS-CoV-2 vaccination using samples collected at four time points (dose 1, dose 2, 2 weeks after dose 2, 8 weeks after dose 2). T-cell clonal analysis was performed by T-cell Receptor (TCR) immunosequencing. The breadth (number of unique sequences to a given protein) and depth (relative abundance of all the unique sequences to a given protein) of the T-cell clonal response were quantified using reference datasets and were compared to antibody responses. Overall, 303 subjects were included (55% female; 5% with prior COVID) (Table). 53% received BNT262b (Pfizer), 42% mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and 5% Ad26CoV2 (J&J). The Spike-specific clonal response peaked 2 weeks after completion of the vaccine regimen (3- and 5-fold for breadth and depth, respectively); no changes were seen for non-Spike clones, suggesting vaccine specificity. Reduced T-cell clonal depth was associated with chronologic age, male sex, and immunomodulator treatment. It was preserved by non-anti-TNF biologic therapies, and augmented clonal depth was associated with anti-TNF treatment. TCR depth and breadth were associated with vaccine type; after adjusting for age and gender, Ad26CoV2 (J&J) exhibited weaker metrics than mRNA-1273 (Moderna) (p=0.01 for each) or BNT262b (Pfizer) (p=0.056 for depth). Antibody and T-cell responses were only modestly correlated. While those with robust humoral responses also had robust TCR clonal expansion, a substantial fraction of patients with high antibody levels had only a minimal T-cell clonal response. Age, sex and select immunotherapies are associated with the T-cell clonal response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and T-cell responses are low in many patients despite high antibody levels. These factors, as well as differences seen by vaccine type may help guide reimmunization vaccine strategy in immune-impaired populations. Further study of the effects of anti-TNF therapy on vaccine responses are warranted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is a highly effective strategy to protect against infection, which is predominantly mediated by vaccine-induced antibodies. Postvaccination antibodies are robustly produced by those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) even on immune-modifying therapies but are blunted by anti-TNF therapy. In contrast, T-cell response which primarily determines long-term efficacy against disease progression,, is less well understood. We aimed to assess the post-vaccination T-cell response and its relationship to antibody responses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immune-modifying therapies.
METHODS
METHODS
We evaluated IBD patients who completed SARS-CoV-2 vaccination using samples collected at four time points (dose 1, dose 2, 2 weeks after dose 2, 8 weeks after dose 2). T-cell clonal analysis was performed by T-cell Receptor (TCR) immunosequencing. The breadth (number of unique sequences to a given protein) and depth (relative abundance of all the unique sequences to a given protein) of the T-cell clonal response were quantified using reference datasets and were compared to antibody responses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 303 subjects were included (55% female; 5% with prior COVID) (Table). 53% received BNT262b (Pfizer), 42% mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and 5% Ad26CoV2 (J&J). The Spike-specific clonal response peaked 2 weeks after completion of the vaccine regimen (3- and 5-fold for breadth and depth, respectively); no changes were seen for non-Spike clones, suggesting vaccine specificity. Reduced T-cell clonal depth was associated with chronologic age, male sex, and immunomodulator treatment. It was preserved by non-anti-TNF biologic therapies, and augmented clonal depth was associated with anti-TNF treatment. TCR depth and breadth were associated with vaccine type; after adjusting for age and gender, Ad26CoV2 (J&J) exhibited weaker metrics than mRNA-1273 (Moderna) (p=0.01 for each) or BNT262b (Pfizer) (p=0.056 for depth). Antibody and T-cell responses were only modestly correlated. While those with robust humoral responses also had robust TCR clonal expansion, a substantial fraction of patients with high antibody levels had only a minimal T-cell clonal response.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Age, sex and select immunotherapies are associated with the T-cell clonal response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and T-cell responses are low in many patients despite high antibody levels. These factors, as well as differences seen by vaccine type may help guide reimmunization vaccine strategy in immune-impaired populations. Further study of the effects of anti-TNF therapy on vaccine responses are warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34909785
doi: 10.1101/2021.12.08.21267444
pmc: PMC8669852
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P01 DK046763
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : U01 DK062413
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA260591
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateIn
Références
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7875):268-273
pubmed: 34320609
Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):2041-2043.e1
pubmed: 34391771
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7847):630-634
pubmed: 33276369
Sci Immunol. 2021 Oct 15;6(64):eabl4509
pubmed: 34623900
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 9;111(36):13139-44
pubmed: 25157137
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7871):268-272
pubmed: 34107529
Science. 2021 Sep 17;373(6561):1372-1377
pubmed: 34385356
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7872):417-422
pubmed: 34192737
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 May;81(5):720-728
pubmed: 35022159
Blood. 2009 Nov 5;114(19):4099-107
pubmed: 19706884
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Dec 31;10(1):
pubmed: 35062724
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 1;116(8):1746-1751
pubmed: 34047304
Microorganisms. 2021 Jun 16;9(6):
pubmed: 34208751
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1205-1211
pubmed: 34002089
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):583-588
pubmed: 32731257
J Clin Invest. 2018 Feb 1;128(2):721-733
pubmed: 29309047
Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;3(9):e627-e637
pubmed: 34258590