Mapping pre-harvest sprouting resistance loci in AAC Innova × AAC Tenacious spring wheat population.
Epistasis interactions
Genetic and epigenetic factors
Phytohormones
Seed coat color
Seed dormancy
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Dec 2021
15 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
15
02
2021
accepted:
11
11
2021
entrez:
16
12
2021
pubmed:
17
12
2021
medline:
18
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) is a major problem for wheat production due to its direct detrimental effects on wheat yield, end-use quality and seed viability. Annually, PHS is estimated to cause > 1.0 billion USD in losses worldwide. Therefore, identifying PHS resistance quantitative trait loci (QTLs) is crucial to aid molecular breeding efforts to minimize losses. Thus, a doubled haploid mapping population derived from a cross between white-grained PHS susceptible cv AAC Innova and red-grained resistant cv AAC Tenacious was screened for PHS resistance in four environments and utilized for QTL mapping. Twenty-one PHS resistance QTLs, including seven major loci (on chromosomes 1A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3D, and 7D), each explaining ≥10% phenotypic variation for PHS resistance, were identified. In every environment, at least one major QTL was identified. PHS resistance at most of these loci was contributed by AAC Tenacious except at two loci on chromosomes 3D and 7D where it was contributed by AAC Innova. Thirteen of the total twenty-one identified loci were located to chromosome positions where at least one QTL have been previously identified in other wheat genotype(s). The remaining eight QTLs are new which have been identified for the first time in this study. Pedigree analysis traced several known donors of PHS resistance in AAC Tenacious genealogy. Comparative analyses of the genetic intervals of identified QTLs with that of already identified and cloned PHS resistance gene intervals using IWGSC RefSeq v2.0 identified MFT-A1b (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3A.1) and AGO802A (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3A.2) on chromosome 3A, MFT-3B-1 (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3B.1) on chromosome 3B, and AGO802D, HUB1, TaVp1-D1 (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3D.1) and TaMyb10-D1 (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3D.2) on chromosome 3D. These candidate genes are involved in embryo- and seed coat-imposed dormancy as well as in epigenetic control of dormancy. Our results revealed the complex PHS resistance genetics of AAC Tenacious and AAC Innova. AAC Tenacious possesses a great reservoir of important PHS resistance QTLs/genes supposed to be derived from different resources. The tracing of pedigrees of AAC Tenacious and other sources complements the validation of QTL analysis results. Finally, comparing our results with previous PHS studies in wheat, we have confirmed the position of several major PHS resistance QTLs and candidate genes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) is a major problem for wheat production due to its direct detrimental effects on wheat yield, end-use quality and seed viability. Annually, PHS is estimated to cause > 1.0 billion USD in losses worldwide. Therefore, identifying PHS resistance quantitative trait loci (QTLs) is crucial to aid molecular breeding efforts to minimize losses. Thus, a doubled haploid mapping population derived from a cross between white-grained PHS susceptible cv AAC Innova and red-grained resistant cv AAC Tenacious was screened for PHS resistance in four environments and utilized for QTL mapping.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-one PHS resistance QTLs, including seven major loci (on chromosomes 1A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3D, and 7D), each explaining ≥10% phenotypic variation for PHS resistance, were identified. In every environment, at least one major QTL was identified. PHS resistance at most of these loci was contributed by AAC Tenacious except at two loci on chromosomes 3D and 7D where it was contributed by AAC Innova. Thirteen of the total twenty-one identified loci were located to chromosome positions where at least one QTL have been previously identified in other wheat genotype(s). The remaining eight QTLs are new which have been identified for the first time in this study. Pedigree analysis traced several known donors of PHS resistance in AAC Tenacious genealogy. Comparative analyses of the genetic intervals of identified QTLs with that of already identified and cloned PHS resistance gene intervals using IWGSC RefSeq v2.0 identified MFT-A1b (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3A.1) and AGO802A (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3A.2) on chromosome 3A, MFT-3B-1 (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3B.1) on chromosome 3B, and AGO802D, HUB1, TaVp1-D1 (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3D.1) and TaMyb10-D1 (in QTL interval QPhs.lrdc-3D.2) on chromosome 3D. These candidate genes are involved in embryo- and seed coat-imposed dormancy as well as in epigenetic control of dormancy.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results revealed the complex PHS resistance genetics of AAC Tenacious and AAC Innova. AAC Tenacious possesses a great reservoir of important PHS resistance QTLs/genes supposed to be derived from different resources. The tracing of pedigrees of AAC Tenacious and other sources complements the validation of QTL analysis results. Finally, comparing our results with previous PHS studies in wheat, we have confirmed the position of several major PHS resistance QTLs and candidate genes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34911435
doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08209-6
pii: 10.1186/s12864-021-08209-6
pmc: PMC8675488
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
900Informations de copyright
© 2021. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
Références
Plant Cell. 2007 Feb;19(2):433-44
pubmed: 17329563
Mol Breed. 2016;36(11):148
pubmed: 27942244
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):10972-6
pubmed: 8248199
Breed Sci. 2015 Mar;65(1):103-9
pubmed: 25931984
Genome Biol. 2015 May 12;16:93
pubmed: 25962727
Plants (Basel). 2020 Apr 09;9(4):
pubmed: 32283717
Theor Appl Genet. 2011 May;122(8):1561-76
pubmed: 21359957
Nat Genet. 2018 Oct;50(10):1435-1441
pubmed: 30250128
Plant Cell Rep. 1989 May;8(5):263-6
pubmed: 24233221
Plant Cell. 2010 Jun;22(6):1733-48
pubmed: 20551347
Funct Plant Biol. 2002 Jul;29(7):881-890
pubmed: 32689536
J Mol Evol. 2005 Nov;61(5):579-90
pubmed: 16170456
Breed Sci. 2018 Jun;68(3):295-304
pubmed: 30100796
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2017 Nov;81(11):2112-2118
pubmed: 28934913
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 09;8(10):e77009
pubmed: 24130825
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 May;106(8):1491-6
pubmed: 12750793
Plant Physiol. 2006 May;141(1):97-107
pubmed: 16543410
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Sep;117(5):691-9
pubmed: 18542909
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Apr;8(2):183-7
pubmed: 15752999
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Nov;115(7):971-80
pubmed: 17712543
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 01;15:259
pubmed: 25085009
Plant Physiol. 2000 Feb;122(2):403-14
pubmed: 10677433
Genetics. 2008 Mar;178(3):1725-36
pubmed: 18245824
Plant Cell. 1992 Oct;4(10):1251-61
pubmed: 1359917
BMC Genomics. 2016 Oct 12;17(1):794
pubmed: 27729004
Genome. 2007 Jul;50(7):627-37
pubmed: 17893740
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Nov;119(7):1223-35
pubmed: 19669633
Cell Rep. 2019 Jul 30;28(5):1362-1369.e4
pubmed: 31365876
Transgenic Res. 2014 Aug;23(4):621-9
pubmed: 24752830
J Exp Bot. 2012 Jul;63(12):4419-36
pubmed: 22791821
J Exp Bot. 2001 Apr;52(357):875-6
pubmed: 11413225
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:573-94
pubmed: 18444908
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104 Suppl 1:8641-8
pubmed: 17494757
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 May;110(7):1315-23
pubmed: 15803290
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Dec;18(12):704-14
pubmed: 24035234
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Jan;130(1):81-89
pubmed: 27650191
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):10203-8
pubmed: 12119408
J Exp Bot. 2002 Jul;53(374):1569-74
pubmed: 12096095
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Dec;14(12):840-52
pubmed: 24240513
Nat Genet. 1995 Nov;11(3):241-7
pubmed: 7581446
New Phytol. 2012 Feb;193(3):605-616
pubmed: 22122546
Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 1;24(5):721-3
pubmed: 18202029
Genes (Basel). 2018 Jan 05;9(1):
pubmed: 29304028
Genetics. 2013 Sep;195(1):263-73
pubmed: 23821595
Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Aug;131(8):1683-1697
pubmed: 29860625
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203068
pubmed: 30161188
Theor Appl Genet. 2010 Nov;121(8):1395-404
pubmed: 20607209
Breed Sci. 2016 Mar;66(2):260-70
pubmed: 27162497
Genome. 2008 Jun;51(6):426-32
pubmed: 18521121
Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457-68
pubmed: 8013918
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;21(12):
pubmed: 32599868
Theor Appl Genet. 2014 Apr;127(4):855-66
pubmed: 24452439
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Nov 29;14:340
pubmed: 25432597
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 13;12(11):e0188049
pubmed: 29131854
Physiol Plant. 2009 Jul;136(3):358-68
pubmed: 19470089
PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 28;17(2):e3000071
pubmed: 30818353
J Exp Bot. 2010 Jul;61(12):3345-53
pubmed: 20519338
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Sep;115(5):721-33
pubmed: 17634915
Front Plant Sci. 2018 May 23;9:668
pubmed: 29875780
Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Oct;5(10):1318-20
pubmed: 20930557
Curr Biol. 2016 Mar 21;26(6):782-7
pubmed: 26948878
Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Jan;104(1):39-47
pubmed: 12579426
J Appl Genet. 2008;49(4):333-41
pubmed: 19029680
Cell. 2006 Dec 29;127(7):1309-21
pubmed: 17190597
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 12;8(9):e73330
pubmed: 24069187
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712
Plant Cell. 2011 Sep;23(9):3215-29
pubmed: 21896881
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56570
pubmed: 23437172