Optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in 2021: the jury is still out. An international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement.
Journal
International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology
ISSN: 1827-1839
Titre abrégé: Int Angiol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 8402693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
17
12
2021
medline:
8
4
2022
entrez:
16
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recommendations of international guidelines for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) often vary considerably and extend from a conservative approach with risk factor modification and best medical treatment (BMT) alone, to a more aggressive approach with a carotid intervention plus BMT. The aim of the current multispecialty position statement was to reconcile the conflicting views on the topic. A literature review was performed with a focus on data from recent studies. Several clinical and imaging high-risk features have been identified that are associated with an increased long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk in patients with ACS. Such high-risk clinical/imaging features include intraplaque hemorrhage, impaired cerebrovascular reserve, carotid plaque echolucency/ulceration/ neovascularization, a lipid-rich necrotic core, a thin or ruptured fibrous cap, silent brain infarction, a contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke episode, male patients <75 years and microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler. There is growing evidence that 80-99% ACS indicate a higher stroke risk than 50-79% stenoses. Although aggressive risk factor control and BMT should be implemented in all ACS patients, several high-risk features that may increase the risk of a future cerebrovascular event are now documented. Consequently, some guidelines recommend a prophylactic carotid intervention in high-risk patients to prevent future cerebrovascular events. Until the results of the much-anticipated randomized controlled trials emerge, the jury is still out regarding the optimal management of ACS patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34913633
pii: S0392-9590.21.04825-2
doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04825-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM