Device Development for Biosimilars: Human Factor Engineering for a Teriparatide Pen.
Teriparatide pen
dose accuracy
formative and validation
human factors
safety and effectiveness
Journal
Expert opinion on biological therapy
ISSN: 1744-7682
Titre abrégé: Expert Opin Biol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101125414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
17
12
2021
medline:
7
4
2022
entrez:
16
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A thorough Human Factors Engineering (HFE) process was implemented to develop a new Teriparatide Pen for the treatment of osteoporosis. The pen provides a cost-effective treatment alternative to branded teriparatide pens. The HFE process ensured that the pen was safe and effective to use and fulfilled the regulatory requirements. The HFE process utilized a risk-based approach that included understanding the users and other use characteristics, preliminary analyses including a thorough risk assessment, a formative and two validation studies. The studies were carried out with intended users - patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) - in the form of simulated use assessments. The preliminary analyses supported the design of the pen's user interface, including its Instructions for Use (IFU). The formative study helped to optimize the user interface. The validation study results were largely favorable but indicated a minor scope for improvement. The IFU was therefore further improved, and a bridging validation study assessed the revised IFU and found it to be effective in supporting the correct use of the pen. The HFE process ensured and demonstrated that the Teriparatide Pen was safe and effective for its intended use.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A thorough Human Factors Engineering (HFE) process was implemented to develop a new Teriparatide Pen for the treatment of osteoporosis. The pen provides a cost-effective treatment alternative to branded teriparatide pens. The HFE process ensured that the pen was safe and effective to use and fulfilled the regulatory requirements.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
METHODS
The HFE process utilized a risk-based approach that included understanding the users and other use characteristics, preliminary analyses including a thorough risk assessment, a formative and two validation studies. The studies were carried out with intended users - patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) - in the form of simulated use assessments.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The preliminary analyses supported the design of the pen's user interface, including its Instructions for Use (IFU). The formative study helped to optimize the user interface. The validation study results were largely favorable but indicated a minor scope for improvement. The IFU was therefore further improved, and a bridging validation study assessed the revised IFU and found it to be effective in supporting the correct use of the pen.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The HFE process ensured and demonstrated that the Teriparatide Pen was safe and effective for its intended use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34913792
doi: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2019217
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
0
Teriparatide
10T9CSU89I
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM