Implementation of a Framework for Telerehabilitation in Clinical Care Across the Continuum During COVID-19 and Beyond.
Journal
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 1537-7385
Titre abrégé: Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8803677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2022
01 01 2022
Historique:
entrez:
16
12
2021
pubmed:
17
12
2021
medline:
31
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has propelled an unprecedented global implementation of telemedicine and telerehabilitation as well as its integration into the healthcare system. Here, we describe the clinical implementation of the A3E framework for the deployment of telerehabilitation in the inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation continuum by addressing accessibility, adaptability, accountability, and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. By using an organized, coordinated, and stratified approach, we increased our telerehabilitation practice from 0 to more than 39,000 visits since the pandemic began. Learning from both the successes and challenges can help address the need to increase access to rehabilitation services even beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34915545
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001904
pii: 00002060-202201000-00009
pmc: PMC8667677
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
53-60Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.
Références
Cox NS, McDonald CF, Alison JA, et al.: Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med 2018;18:71
Godwin KM, Wasserman J, Ostwald SK: Cost associated with stroke: outpatient rehabilitative services and medication. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011;18(suppl 1):676–84
Park B, Bashshur R: Some implications of telemedicine. J Commun 1975;25:161–6
Levine SR, Gorman M: “Telestroke”: the application of telemedicine for stroke. Stroke 1999;30:464–9
Audebert H: Telestroke: effective networking. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:279–82
Poon JT, Tkach A, Havenon AH, et al.: Telestroke consultation can accurately diagnose ischemic stroke mimics. J Telemed Telecare 2021. doi:10.1177/1357633X21989558. Online ahead of print
doi: 10.1177/1357633X21989558
Reddy S, Wu TC, Zhang J, et al.: Lack of racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in ischemic stroke care metrics within a tele-stroke network. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:105418
Waseem H, Salih YA, Burney CP, et al.: Efficacy and safety of the telestroke drip-and-stay model: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:105638
Dallolio L, Menarini M, China S, et al.: Functional and clinical outcomes of telemedicine in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:2332–41
Caughlin S, Mehta S, Corriveau H, et al.: Implementing telerehabilitation after stroke: lessons learned from Canadian trials. Telemed J E Health 2020;26:710–9
Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, et al.: Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:1079–87
Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, et al.: Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;1:CD010255
Richmond T, Peterson C, Cason J, et al.: American Telemedicine Association’s principles for delivering telerehabilitation services. Int J Telerehabil 2017;9:63–8
Jayasree-Krishnan V, Ghosh S, Palumbo A, et al.: Developing a framework for designing and deploying technology-assisted rehabilitation after stroke: a qualitative study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021;100:774–9
Jette DU, Stilphen M, Ranganathan VK, et al.: AM-PAC “6-Clicks” functional assessment scores predict acute care hospital discharge destination. Phys Ther 2014;94:1252–61
Jette DU, Stilphen M, Ranganathan VK, et al.: Validity of the AM-PAC “6-Clicks” inpatient daily activity and basic mobility short forms. Phys Ther 2014;94:379–91
Haig AJ: Telerehabilitation, in Richter EF (ed): Medical Aspects of Disability , 4th ed. New York, Springer Publishing Company, 2011
Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, et al.: Telerehabilitation: review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2017;4:e7
Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Bean AC, Tenforde AS, et al.: How to conduct an outpatient telemedicine rehabilitation or prehabilitation visit. PM R 2020;12:714–20
Annaswamy TM, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Frieden L: Telemedicine barriers and challenges for persons with disabilities: COVID-19 and beyond. Disabil Health J 2020;13:100973
Tenforde AS, Iaccarino MA, Borgstrom H, et al.: Telemedicine during COVID-19 for outpatient sports and musculoskeletal medicine physicians. PM R 2020;12:926–32
Tenforde AS, Borgstrom H, Polich G, et al.: Outpatient physical, occupational, and speech therapy synchronous telemedicine: a survey study of patient satisfaction with virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2020;99:977–81
Rizzo JR, Beheshti M, Fang Y, et al.: COVID-19 and visual disability: can’t look and now don’t touch. PM R 2021;13:415–21
Murphy RP, Dennehy KA, Costello MM, et al.: Virtual geriatric clinics and the COVID-19 catalyst: a rapid review. Age Ageing 2020;49:907–14
Shew A: Let COVID-19 expand awareness of disability tech. Nature 2020;581:9
Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Lara AM, Annaswamy TM: When disparities and disabilities collide: inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic. PM R 2021;13:412–4