Structure-guided bifunctional molecules hit a DEUBAD-lacking hRpn13 species upregulated in multiple myeloma.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 12 2021
Historique:
received: 05 07 2021
accepted: 29 11 2021
entrez: 17 12 2021
pubmed: 18 12 2021
medline: 30 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Proteasome substrate receptor hRpn13 is a promising anti-cancer target. By integrated in silico and biophysical screening, we identified a chemical scaffold that binds hRpn13 with non-covalent interactions that mimic the proteasome and a weak electrophile for Michael addition. hRpn13 Pru domain binds proteasomes and ubiquitin whereas its DEUBAD domain binds deubiquitinating enzyme UCHL5. NMR revealed lead compound XL5 to interdigitate into a hydrophobic pocket created by lateral movement of a Pru β-hairpin with an exposed end for Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs). Implementing XL5-PROTACs as chemical probes identified a DEUBAD-lacking hRpn13 species (hRpn13

Identifiants

pubmed: 34916494
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27570-4
pii: 10.1038/s41467-021-27570-4
pmc: PMC8677766
doi:

Substances chimiques

ADRM1 protein, human 0
Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins 0
Transcription Factors 0
Ubiquitin 0
Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex EC 3.4.25.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7318

Subventions

Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA BC011490
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA BC011627
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Références

Chen, X., Htet, Z. M., Lopez-Alfonzo, E., Martin, A. & Walters, K. J. Proteasome interaction with ubiquitinated substrates: from mechanisms to therapies. FEBS J. 288, 5231–5251 (2020).
pubmed: 33211406 doi: 10.1111/febs.15638
Cromm, P. M. & Crews, C. M. The proteasome in modern drug discovery: second life of a highly valuable drug target. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 830–838 (2017).
pubmed: 28852696 pmcid: 5571462 doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00252
Randles, L. & Walters, K. J. Ubiquitin and its binding domains. Front Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 17, 2140–2157 (2012).
doi: 10.2741/4042
Pettersson, M. & Crews, C. M. PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs)—past, present and future. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 31, 15–27 (2019).
pubmed: 31200855 pmcid: 6578591 doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2019.01.002
Shi, Y. et al. Rpn1 provides adjacent receptor sites for substrate binding and deubiquitination by the proteasome. Science 351, aad9421 (2016).
Schreiner, P. et al. Ubiquitin docking at the proteasome through a novel pleckstrin-homology domain interaction. Nature 453, 548–552 (2008).
pubmed: 18497827 pmcid: 2825158 doi: 10.1038/nature06924
Husnjak, K. et al. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 453, 481–488 (2008).
pubmed: 18497817 pmcid: 2839886 doi: 10.1038/nature06926
Young, P., Deveraux, Q., Beal, R. E., Pickart, C. M. & Rechsteiner, M. Characterization of two polyubiquitin binding sites in the 26 S protease subunit 5a. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5461–5467 (1998).
pubmed: 9488668 doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5461
Chen, X. et al. Structures of Rpn1 T1:Rad23 and hRpn13:hPLIC2 reveal distinct binding mechanisms between substrate receptors and shuttle factors of the proteasome. Structure 24, 1257–1270 (2016).
pubmed: 27396824 pmcid: 4972676 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.05.018
Walters, K. J., Kleijnen, M. F., Goh, A. M., Wagner, G. & Howley, P. M. Structural studies of the interaction between ubiquitin family proteins and proteasome subunit S5a. Biochemistry 41, 1767–1777 (2002).
pubmed: 11827521 doi: 10.1021/bi011892y
Zhang, N. et al. Structure of the s5a:k48-linked diubiquitin complex and its interactions with rpn13. Mol. Cell 35, 280–290 (2009).
pubmed: 19683493 pmcid: 2748877 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.010
Hiyama, H. et al. Interaction of hHR23 with S5a. The ubiquitin-like domain of hHR23 mediates interaction with S5a subunit of 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28019–28025 (1999).
pubmed: 10488153 doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.39.28019
Wang, Q., Young, P. & Walters, K. J. Structure of S5a bound to monoubiquitin provides a model for polyubiquitin recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 348, 727–739 (2005).
pubmed: 15826667 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.007
Qiu, X. B. et al. hRpn13/ADRM1/GP110 is a novel proteasome subunit that binds the deubiquitinating enzyme, UCH37. EMBO J. 25, 5742–5753 (2006).
pubmed: 17139257 pmcid: 1698896 doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601450
Hamazaki, J. et al. A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes. EMBO J. 25, 4524–4536 (2006).
pubmed: 16990800 pmcid: 1589993 doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601338
Yao, T. et al. Proteasome recruitment and activation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme by Adrm1. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 994–1002 (2006).
pubmed: 16906146 doi: 10.1038/ncb1460
Leggett, D. S. et al. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 10, 495–507 (2002).
pubmed: 12408819 doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00638-X
Verma, R. et al. Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3425–3439 (2000).
pubmed: 11029046 pmcid: 15004 doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3425
Buel, G. R. et al. Structure of E3 ligase E6AP with a proteasome-binding site provided by substrate receptor hRpn10. Nat. Commun. 11, 1291 (2020).
pubmed: 32157086 pmcid: 7064531 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15073-7
Randles, L., Anchoori, R. K., Roden, R. B. & Walters, K. J. The proteasome ubiquitin receptor hRpn13 and its interacting deubiquitinating enzyme Uch37 are required for proper cell cycle progression. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 8773–8783 (2016).
pubmed: 26907685 pmcid: 4861445 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.694588
Verma, R. et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298, 611–615 (2002).
pubmed: 12183636 doi: 10.1126/science.1075898
Dong, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structures and dynamics of substrate-engaged human 26S proteasome. Nature 565, 49–55 (2019).
pubmed: 30479383 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0736-4
de la Pena, A. H., Goodall, E. A., Gates, S. N., Lander, G. C. & Martin, A. Substrate-engaged 26S proteasome structures reveal mechanisms for ATP-hydrolysis-driven translocation. Science 362, eaav0725 (2018).
pubmed: 30309908 pmcid: 6519459 doi: 10.1126/science.aav0725
Chen, X. et al. Cryo-EM reveals unanchored M1-ubiquitin chain binding at hRpn11 of the 26S proteasome. Structure 28, 1206–1217 (2020).
pubmed: 32783951 pmcid: 7642156 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.07.011
Lauinger, L. et al. Thiolutin is a zinc chelator that inhibits the Rpn11 and other JAMM metalloproteases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 709–714 (2017).
pubmed: 28459440 pmcid: 5792653 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2370
Perez, C. et al. Discovery of an inhibitor of the proteasome subunit Rpn11. J. Med Chem. 60, 1343–1361 (2017).
pubmed: 28191850 pmcid: 5761724 doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01379
Anchoori, R. K. et al. A bis-benzylidine piperidone targeting proteasome ubiquitin receptor RPN13/ADRM1 as a therapy for cancer. Cancer Cell 24, 791–805 (2013).
pubmed: 24332045 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.11.001
Anchoori, R. K. et al. Covalent Rpn13-binding inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer. ACS Omega 3, 11917–11929 (2018).
pubmed: 30288466 pmcid: 6166221 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01479
Song, Y. et al. Targeting proteasome ubiquitin receptor Rpn13 in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 30, 1877–1886 (2016).
pubmed: 27118409 pmcid: 5749253 doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.97
Osei-Amponsa, V. et al. Impact of losing hRpn13 Pru or UCHL5 on proteasome clearance of ubiquitinated proteins and RA190 cytotoxicity. Mol. Cell Biol. 40, e00122-20 (2020).
pubmed: 32631902 pmcid: 7459265 doi: 10.1128/MCB.00122-20
Dickson, P. et al. Physical and functional analysis of the putative Rpn13 inhibitor RA190. Cell Chem. Biol. 27, 1371–1382 (2020).
pubmed: 32857985 pmcid: 7680414 doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.08.007
Dickson, P., Simanski, S., Ngundu, J. M. & Kodadek, T. Mechanistic studies of the multiple myeloma and melanoma cell-selective toxicity of the Rpn13-binding peptoid KDT-11. Cell Chem. Biol. 27, 1383–1395 (2020).
pubmed: 32857986 pmcid: 7680388 doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.08.008
Trader, D. J., Simanski, S. & Kodadek, T. A reversible and highly selective inhibitor of the proteasomal ubiquitin receptor Rpn13 is toxic to multiple myeloma cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 6312–6319 (2015).
pubmed: 25914958 pmcid: 4455945 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02069
Lu, X., Liu, F., Durham, S. E., Tarasov, S. G. & Walters, K. J. A high affinity hRpn2-derived peptide that displaces human Rpn13 from proteasome in 293T cells. PLoS One 10, e0140518 (2015).
pubmed: 26466095 pmcid: 4605517 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140518
Lu, X. et al. Structure of the Rpn13-Rpn2 complex provides insights for Rpn13 and Uch37 as anticancer targets. Nat. Commun. 8, 15540 (2017).
pubmed: 28598414 pmcid: 5494190 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15540
VanderLinden, R. T., Hemmis, C. W., Yao, T., Robinson, H. & Hill, C. P. Structure and energetics of pairwise interactions between proteasome subunits RPN2, RPN13, and ubiquitin clarify a substrate recruitment mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 9493–9504 (2017).
pubmed: 28442575 pmcid: 5465478 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.785287
Lu, X., Ebelle, D. L., Matsuo, H. & Walters, K. J. An extended conformation for K48 ubiquitin chains revealed by the hRpn2:Rpn13:K48-diubiquitin structure. Structure 28, 495–506 e3 (2020).
pubmed: 32160516 pmcid: 7205571 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.02.007
Roelofs, J. The extent of extended-ubiquitin binding to the proteasome. Structure 28, 489–491 (2020).
pubmed: 32375056 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.04.013
Chen, X., Lee, B. H., Finley, D. & Walters, K. J. Structure of proteasome ubiquitin receptor hRpn13 and its activation by the scaffolding protein hRpn2. Mol. Cell 38, 404–415 (2010).
pubmed: 20471946 pmcid: 2887722 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.04.019
Kumar, C. D. et al. Investigation of anion-pi interactions involving thiophene walls incorporated calix[4]pyrroles. J. Org. Chem. 80, 1746–1753 (2015).
pubmed: 25574562 doi: 10.1021/jo502673c
Hu, J. et al. Discovery of ERD-308 as a highly potent proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) degrader of estrogen receptor (ER). J. Med. Chem. 62, 1420–1442 (2019).
pubmed: 30990042 doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01572
Varfolomeev, E. et al. IAP antagonists induce autoubiquitination of c-IAPs, NF-kappaB activation, and TNFalpha-dependent apoptosis. Cell 131, 669–681 (2007).
pubmed: 18022362 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.030
Thakurta, A. et al. Absence of mutations in cereblon (CRBN) and DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1) genes and significance for IMiD therapy. Leukemia 28, 1129–1131 (2014).
pubmed: 24166296 doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.315
Sebastian, S. et al. Multiple myeloma cells’ capacity to decompose H2O2 determines lenalidomide sensitivity. Blood 129, 991–1007 (2017).
pubmed: 28028022 pmcid: 5324717 doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-738872
Gandhi, A. K. et al. Measuring cereblon as a biomarker of response or resistance to lenalidomide and pomalidomide requires use of standardized reagents and understanding of gene complexity. Br. J. Haematol. 164, 233–244 (2014).
pubmed: 24206017 doi: 10.1111/bjh.12622
Zoppi, V. et al. Iterative design and optimization of initially inactive proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) identify VZ185 as a potent, fast, and selective von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) based dual degrader probe of BRD9 and BRD7. J. Med Chem. 62, 699–726 (2019).
pubmed: 30540463 doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01413
Feng, Q. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals that arctigenin alleviates concanavalin A-induced hepatitis through suppressing immune system and regulating autophagy. Front Immunol. 9, 1881 (2018).
pubmed: 30177931 pmcid: 6109684 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01881
Besche, H. C. et al. Autoubiquitination of the 26S proteasome on Rpn13 regulates breakdown of ubiquitin conjugates. EMBO J. 33, 1159–1176 (2014).
pubmed: 24811749 pmcid: 4193922 doi: 10.1002/embj.201386906
Kim, W. et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. Mol. Cell 44, 325–340 (2011).
pubmed: 21906983 pmcid: 3200427 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.025
Cohen-Kaplan, V. et al. p62- and ubiquitin-dependent stress-induced autophagy of the mammalian 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7490–E7499 (2016).
pubmed: 27791183 pmcid: 5127335 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615455113
Bradshaw, J. M. et al. Prolonged and tunable residence time using reversible covalent kinase inhibitors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 525–531 (2015).
pubmed: 26006010 pmcid: 4472506 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1817
Serafimova, I. M. et al. Reversible targeting of noncatalytic cysteines with chemically tuned electrophiles. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 471–476 (2012).
pubmed: 22466421 pmcid: 3657615 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.925
Gabizon, R. et al. Efficient targeted degradation via reversible and irreversible covalent PROTACs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 11734–11742 (2020).
pubmed: 32369353 pmcid: 7349657 doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13907
Guo, W. H. et al. Enhancing intracellular accumulation and target engagement of PROTACs with reversible covalent chemistry. Nat. Commun. 11, 4268 (2020).
pubmed: 32848159 pmcid: 7450057 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17997-6
Deol, K. K. et al. Proteasome-Bound UCH37/UCHL5 debranches ubiquitin chains to promote degradation. Mol. Cell 80, 796–809 (2020).
pubmed: 33156996 pmcid: 7718437 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.017
Kisselev, A. F., van der Linden, W. A. & Overkleeft, H. S. Proteasome inhibitors: an expanding army attacking a unique target. Chem. Biol. 19, 99–115 (2012).
pubmed: 22284358 pmcid: 3503453 doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.01.003
Song, Y. et al. Development and preclinical validation of a novel covalent ubiquitin receptor Rpn13 degrader in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 33, 2685–2694 (2019).
pubmed: 30962579 pmcid: 6783320 doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0467-z
Neves, M. A., Totrov, M. & Abagyan, R. Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement. J. Comput Aided Mol. Des. 26, 675–686 (2012).
pubmed: 22569591 pmcid: 3398187 doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9547-0
Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277–293 (1995).
pubmed: 8520220 doi: 10.1007/BF00197809
Bartels, C., Xia, T. H., Billeter, M., Guntert, P. & Wuthrich, K. The program XEASY for computer-supported NMR spectral analysis of biological macromolecules. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 1–10 (1995).
pubmed: 22911575 doi: 10.1007/BF00417486
Schwieters, C. D., Kuszewski, J. J., Tjandra, N. & Clore, G. M. The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J. Magn. Reson. 160, 65–73 (2003).
pubmed: 12565051 doi: 10.1016/S1090-7807(02)00014-9
Schuttelkopf, A. W. & van Aalten, D. M. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 1355–1363 (2004).
pubmed: 15272157 doi: 10.1107/S0907444904011679
Laskowski, R. A., Rullmannn, J. A., MacArthur, M. W., Kaptein, R. & Thornton, J. M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 8, 477–486 (1996).
pubmed: 9008363 doi: 10.1007/BF00228148
Koradi, R., Billeter, M. & Wuthrich, K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph 14, 51–55 (1996). 
pubmed: 8744573 doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00009-4
Laurent, A., Proulx, M. & Jaquith, J. Functionalized pyrrolidines and use thereof as IAP inhibitors. PCT Int. Appl. WO2009136290 (2009).
Chari, R., Yeo, N. C., Chavez, A. & Church, G. M. sgRNA Scorer 2.0: a species-independent model to predict CRISPR/Cas9 activity. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 902–904 (2017).
pubmed: 28146356 pmcid: 5793212 doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00343
Gooden, A. A., Evans, C. N., Sheets, T. P., Clapp, M. E. & Chari, R. dbGuide: a database of functionally validated guide RNAs for genome editing in human and mouse cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D871–D876 (2021).
pubmed: 33051688 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa848
Ramlee, M. K., Yan, T., Cheung, A. M., Chuah, C. T. & Li, S. High-throughput genotyping of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutants using fluorescent PCR-capillary gel electrophoresis. Sci. Rep. 5, 15587 (2015).
pubmed: 26498861 pmcid: 4620477 doi: 10.1038/srep15587
Chen, X. & Walters, K. J. Identifying and studying ubiquitin receptors by NMR. Methods Mol. Biol. 832, 279–303 (2012).
pubmed: 22350893 pmcid: 6392013 doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-474-2_20

Auteurs

Xiuxiu Lu (X)

Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Venkata R Sabbasani (VR)

Chemistry and Synthesis Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.

Vasty Osei-Amponsa (V)

Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Christine N Evans (CN)

Genome Modification Core, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Julianna C King (JC)

Genome Modification Core, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Sergey G Tarasov (SG)

Biophysics Resource, Center for Structural Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Marzena Dyba (M)

Biophysics Resource, Center for Structural Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Sudipto Das (S)

Protein Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

King C Chan (KC)

Protein Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Charles D Schwieters (CD)

Computational Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance Core, Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-5620, USA.

Sulbha Choudhari (S)

Sequencing Facility Bioinformatics Group, Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA.

Caroline Fromont (C)

Sequencing Facility, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA.

Yongmei Zhao (Y)

Sequencing Facility Bioinformatics Group, Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA.

Bao Tran (B)

Sequencing Facility, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA.

Xiang Chen (X)

Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Hiroshi Matsuo (H)

Basic Science Program, Center for Structural Biology, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Thorkell Andresson (T)

Protein Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Raj Chari (R)

Genome Modification Core, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Rolf E Swenson (RE)

Chemistry and Synthesis Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.

Nadya I Tarasova (NI)

Laboratory of Cancer Immunometabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Kylie J Walters (KJ)

Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA. kylie.walters@nih.gov.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH