Seabird meta-Population Viability Model (mPVA) methods.

AFR, Age of first reproduction AoO, Area of occupancy Bayesian hierarchical model Conservation Extinction risk IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature JAGS, Just another Gibbs Sampler K, Carrying capacity MCMC, Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis MLE, Maximum likelihood estimation Population model QE, Quasi-extinction threshold QEP, Quasi-extinction probability R, R computer language for statistical computing SSD, Stable stage distribution mPVA, meta-Population Viability Analysis

Journal

MethodsX
ISSN: 2215-0161
Titre abrégé: MethodsX
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101639829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 03 09 2021
accepted: 04 12 2021
entrez: 17 12 2021
pubmed: 18 12 2021
medline: 18 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The seabird meta-population viability model (mPVA) uses a generalized approach to project abundance and quasi-extinction risk for 102 seabird species under various conservation scenarios. The mPVA is a stage-structured projection matrix that tracks abundance of multiple populations linked by dispersal, accounting for breeding island characteristics and spatial distribution. Data are derived from published studies, grey literature, and expert review (with over 500 contributions). Invasive species impacts were generalized to stage-specific vital rates by fitting a Bayesian state-space model to trend data from Islands where invasive removals had occurred, while accounting for characteristics of seabird biology, breeding islands and invasive species. Survival rates were estimated using a competing hazards formulation to account for impacts of multiple threats, while also allowing for environmental and demographic stochasticity, density dependence and parameter uncertainty.•The mPVA provides resource managers with a tool to quantitatively assess potential benefits of alternative management actions, for multiple species•The mPVA compares projected abundance and quasi-extinction risk under current conditions (no intervention) and various conservation scenarios, including removal of invasive species from specified breeding islands, translocation or reintroduction of individuals to an island of specified location and size, and at-sea mortality amelioration via reduction in annual at-sea deaths.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34917491
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101599
pii: S2215-0161(21)00389-7
pmc: PMC8669317
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101599

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Conserv Biol. 2008 Feb;22(1):16-26
pubmed: 18254849
Ecology. 2007 Feb;88(2):296-305
pubmed: 17479748
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep;33(9):676-688
pubmed: 30007845
Oecologia. 1989 Jan;78(1):131-137
pubmed: 28311912
Ecol Lett. 2007 Dec;10(12):1182-98
pubmed: 17803676
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;90(8):2672-9
pubmed: 19299065
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jan 6;95(1):213-8
pubmed: 9419355
Nature. 2000 Mar 23;404(6776):385-7
pubmed: 10746724
J Anim Ecol. 2006 Jan;75(1):228-38
pubmed: 16903060
J Appl Ecol. 2019 Apr;56(4):855-865
pubmed: 31217633

Auteurs

M Tim Tinker (MT)

EEB Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA.
Nhydra Ecological Consulting, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Kelly M Zilliacus (KM)

Conservation Action Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA.

Diana Ruiz (D)

Conservation Action Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA.

Bernie R Tershy (BR)

Conservation Action Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA.

Donald A Croll (DA)

Conservation Action Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA.

Classifications MeSH