Concurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair During Robot-Assisted Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: Single Center Experience.
hernia
mesh application
prostate cancer
robotic surgery
Journal
Robotic surgery (Auckland)
ISSN: 2324-5344
Titre abrégé: Robot Surg
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101703383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
09
2021
accepted:
27
11
2021
entrez:
17
12
2021
pubmed:
18
12
2021
medline:
18
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate outcomes of concurrent inguinal hernia (IH) repair with mesh during transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Data of 26 patients (31 procedures) undergoing IH repair concurrently with RARP between January 2017 and January 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients' demographics, intraoperative and postoperative variables were recorded. Patients were assessed based on prostate-specific antigen recurrence, IH recurrence, mesh infection, seroma formation and groin pain quarterly in the first year, and every six month thereafter. The median age was 64.5 years in our population. IH was detected preoperatively in 46.2% of patients (n = 12) and intraoperatively in 53.8% (n = 14). Twenty-one (80.8%) patients (11 of them had right IH and 10 of them had left IH) had unilateral hernias and 5 patients (19.2%) had bilateral hernias. Twenty-three (88.4%) IHs were direct, three (11.6%) were indirect. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 192.5 (range: 140-250) min and 100 (range: 10-170) mL, respectively. The median duration of IH repair, time of drainage, length of hospitalization, and catheterization were 32.5 (range: 14-40) min. 2 (range: 2-6) days, 6 (range: 5-8) days and 7 (range: 5-7) days, respectively. No perioperative complication due to RARP or IH repair was observed. During a median follow-up time was 18 months, no scrotal hematoma, seroma formation or mesh infection was identified. IH repair performed during the same session at RARP is a safe and applicable procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34917689
doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S339892
pii: 339892
pmc: PMC8666846
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
39-44Informations de copyright
© 2021 Bedir et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Abdullah Erdem Canda reports personal fees from Conmed, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003 Feb;13(1):27-31
pubmed: 12676018
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):261-7
pubmed: 22527929
J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1036-1040
pubmed: 27575356
Int J Med Robot. 2010 Sep;6(3):311-4
pubmed: 20812271
South Med J. 1994 Jan;87(1):23-5
pubmed: 8284712
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949 Nov;89(5):621
pubmed: 18144044
J Urol. 1987 Jun;137(6):1180-3
pubmed: 3586150
J Endourol. 2016 Feb;30(2):218-22
pubmed: 26486884
Surgery. 2007 Feb;141(2):262-6
pubmed: 17263984
BJU Int. 2005 Aug;96(3):330-3
pubmed: 16042725
Hernia. 2015 Apr;19(2):239-46
pubmed: 24509890
Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):325-8
pubmed: 16333536
J Endourol. 2011 Apr;25(4):625-9
pubmed: 21417751
J Endourol. 2016 Feb;30(2):208-11
pubmed: 26414558
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):381-386
pubmed: 30033512
Br J Surg. 2002 Mar;89(3):293-7
pubmed: 11872052
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(2):240-4
pubmed: 26251753
Urology. 2006 Aug;68(2):267-71
pubmed: 16904432
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165
pubmed: 29330835
J Robot Surg. 2008;1(4):269-72
pubmed: 25484976
Br J Surg. 2009 Aug;96(8):851-8
pubmed: 19591158
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):1034-7
pubmed: 16286119
Urology. 2011 Apr;77(4):957-62
pubmed: 21333335
Urology. 1996 Apr;47(4):536-7
pubmed: 8638364
Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1223-7
pubmed: 23732267