The diachronic account of attentional selectivity.
Attention systems
Attentional episodes
Attentional selection
Recurrent processing
Journal
Psychonomic bulletin & review
ISSN: 1531-5320
Titre abrégé: Psychon Bull Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502924
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
accepted:
27
09
2021
pubmed:
18
12
2021
medline:
8
9
2022
entrez:
17
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many models of attention assume that attentional selection takes place at a specific moment in time that demarcates the critical transition from pre-attentive to attentive processing of sensory input. We argue that this intuitively appealing standard account of attentional selectivity is not only inaccurate, but has led to substantial conceptual confusion. As an alternative, we offer a 'diachronic' framework that describes attentional selectivity as a process that unfolds over time. Key to this view is the concept of attentional episodes, brief periods of intense attentional amplification of sensory representations that regulate access to working memory and response-related processes. We describe how attentional episodes are linked to earlier attentional mechanisms and to recurrent processing at the neural level. We review studies that establish the existence of attentional episodes, delineate the factors that determine if and when they are triggered, and discuss the costs associated with processing multiple events within a single episode. Finally, we argue that this framework offers new solutions to old problems in attention research that have never been resolved. It can provide a unified and conceptually coherent account of the network of cognitive and neural processes that produce the goal-directed selectivity in perceptual processing that is commonly referred to as 'attention'.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34918282
doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02023-7
pii: 10.3758/s13423-021-02023-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1118-1142Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Références
Akyürek, E. G., & Meijerink, S. K. (2012). The deployment of visual attention during temporal integration: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 49(7), 885-898.
pubmed: 22564038
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01380.x
Akyürek, E. G., & Wolff, M. J. (2016). Extended temporal integration in rapid serial visual presentation: Attentional control at Lag 1 and beyond. Acta Psychologica, 168, 50-64.
pubmed: 27155801
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.009
Akyürek, E. G., Eshuis, S. A., Nieuwenstein, M. R., Saija, J. D., Başkent, D., & Hommel, B. (2012). Temporal target integration underlies performance at lag 1 in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1448-1464.
pubmed: 22428668
Akyürek, E. G., Kappelmann, N., Volkert, M., & Van Rijn, H. (2017). What you see is what you remember: Visual chunking by temporal integration enhances working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(12), 2025–2036.
Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In: Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience, (pp 183-218). MIT Press.
Anderson, B. (2011). There is no such thing as attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 246.
pubmed: 21977019
pmcid: 3178817
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00246
Anderson, B. A. (2016). The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 24-39.
pubmed: 26595376
doi: 10.1111/nyas.12957
Anderson, B. A. (2021). Time to stop calling it attentional “capture” and embrace a mechanistic understanding of attentional priority. Visual Cognition, 29(9), 537–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2021.1892894 .
Ashby, F. G., & Lee, W. W. (1993). Perceptual variability as a fundamental axiom of perceptual science. In: Advances in psychology (Vol. 99, pp. 369-399). North-Holland.
Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437-443.
pubmed: 22795563
pmcid: 3426354
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
Bachman, M. D., Wang, L., Gamble, M. L., & Woldorff, M. G. (2020). Physical salience and value-driven salience operate through different neural mechanisms to enhance attentional selection. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(28), 5455-5464.
pubmed: 32471878
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1198-19.2020
Baluch, F., & Itti, L. (2011). Mechanisms of top-down attention. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(4), 210-224.
pubmed: 21439656
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.02.003
Benoni, H., & Tsal, Y. (2012). Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 631-638.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0244-8
Boehler, C. N., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H. J., & Hopf, J. M. (2008). Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(25), 8742-8747.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801999105
Botella, J., Suero, M., & Barriopedro, M. I. (2001). A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1452–1467.
pubmed: 11766936
Bowman, H., & Wyble, B. (2007). The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 38–70.
pubmed: 17227181
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.38
Brisson, B., Robitaille, N., & Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc. Neuroreport, 18(15), 1627-1630.
pubmed: 17885614
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f0b559
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford University Press.
doi: 10.1037/10037-000
Brockmole, J. R., Wang, R. F., & Irwin, D. E. (2002). Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 315-334.
pubmed: 11999857
Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112(2), 291–328.
pubmed: 15783288
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.291
Callahan-Flintoft, C., & Wyble, B. (2017). Non-singleton colours are not attended faster than categories, but they are encoded faster: A combined approach of behavior, modeling and ERPs. Vision Research, 140, 106-119.
pubmed: 28859969
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.06.013
Callahan-Flintoft, C., Chen, H., & Wyble, B. (2018). A hierarchical model of visual processing simulates neural mechanisms underlying reflexive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(9), 1273-1294.
doi: 10.1037/xge0000484
Camprodon, J. A., Zohary, E., Brodbeck, V., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010). Two phases of V1 activity for visual recognition of natural images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1262-1269.
pubmed: 19413482
pmcid: 3369215
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21253
Carmel, T., & Lamy, D. (2014). The same-location cost is unrelated to attentional settings: An object-updating account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1465-1478.
pubmed: 24730745
Chambers, C. D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2005). Neurodisruption of selective attention: insights and implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 542-550.
pubmed: 16214388
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.010
Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(4), 859-880.
pubmed: 1775667
doi: 10.1080/14640749108400960
Cheal, M., Lyon, D. R., & Hubbard, D. C. (1991). Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(4), 825-857.
pubmed: 1775666
doi: 10.1080/14640749108400959
Chen, H., & Wyble, B. (2018). The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits. Psychological Review, 125(6), 936-968.
pubmed: 30080067
doi: 10.1037/rev0000116
Chen, J., Leber, A. B., & Golomb, J. D. (2019). Attentional capture alters feature perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(11), 1443–1454.
pubmed: 31464467
Christie, G. J., Livingstone, A. C., & McDonald, J. J. (2015). Searching for inefficiency in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(1), 46-56.
pubmed: 25203277
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00716
Chun, M. M. (1997). Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1191–1199.
doi: 10.3758/BF03214207
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10(4), 360-365.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00168
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 109-127.
pubmed: 7707027
Cohen, M. R., & Maunsell, J. H. (2009). Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations. Nature Neuroscience, 12(12), 1594-1600.
pubmed: 19915566
pmcid: 2820564
doi: 10.1038/nn.2439
Cohen, J. Y., Heitz, R. P., Schall, J. D., & Woodman, G. F. (2009). On the origin of event-related potentials indexing covert attentional selection during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(4), 2375-2386.
pubmed: 19675287
pmcid: 2775385
doi: 10.1152/jn.00680.2009
Darnell, M., & Lamy, D. (2021). Spatial cueing effects do not always index attentional capture: Evidence for a Priority Accumulation Framework. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01597-0 .
Dell’Acqua, R., Dux, P. E., Wyble, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (2012). Sparing from the attentional blink is not spared from structural limitations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(2), 232-238.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0209-3
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.
pubmed: 7605061
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70(1), 80-90.
pubmed: 14027390
doi: 10.1037/h0039515
Di Lollo, V. (2014). Reentrant processing mediates object substitution masking: Comment on Põder (2013). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 819.
pubmed: 25136322
pmcid: 4120675
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00819
Di Lollo, V. (2018). Attention is a sterile concept; iterative reentry is a fertile substitute. Consciousness and Cognition, 64, 45-49.
pubmed: 29482916
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.02.005
Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(4), 481-507.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481
Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Shahab Ghorashi, S. M., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191-200.
pubmed: 15597184
doi: 10.1007/s00426-004-0173-x
Di Russo, F., Martínez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15(2), 95-111.
pubmed: 11835601
doi: 10.1002/hbm.10010
Dowd, E. W., & Golomb, J. D. (2019). Object-feature binding survives dynamic shifts of spatial attention. Psychological Science, 30(3), 343-361.
pubmed: 30694718
pmcid: 6419262
doi: 10.1177/0956797618818481
Dowd, E. W., & Golomb, J. D. (2020). The Binding Problem after an eye movement. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(1), 168-180.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01739-y
Drisdelle, B. L., & Jolicoeur, P. (2018). Early and late selection processes have separable influences on the neural substrates of attention. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 127, 52-61.
pubmed: 29524444
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.03.004
Drisdelle, B. L., West, G. L., & Jolicoeur, P. (2016). The deployment of visual spatial attention during visual search predicts response time: electrophysiological evidence from the N2pc. Neuroreport, 27(16), 1237-1242.
pubmed: 27648715
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000684
Driver, J. (2001). A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology, 92(1), 53-78.
pubmed: 11802865
doi: 10.1348/000712601162103
Driver, J., & Frith, C. (2000). Shifting baselines in attention research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(2), 147-148.
pubmed: 11252778
doi: 10.1038/35039083
Duhamel, J. R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992). The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science, 255(5040), 90-92.
pubmed: 1553535
doi: 10.1126/science.1553535
Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87(3), 272-300.
pubmed: 7384344
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.272
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 578–588.
pubmed: 1593236
Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 99(3), 225-234.
pubmed: 8862112
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9
Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(8), 1423-1433.
pubmed: 18303979
pmcid: 2564114
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20099
Eimer, M., & Mazza, V. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of change detection. Psychophysiology, 42(3), 328-342.
pubmed: 15943687
pmcid: 2376205
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00285.x
Eimer, M., Kiss, M., & Cheung, T. (2010). Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Vision Research, 50(14), 1353-1361.
pubmed: 19895829
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.001
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149.
doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
Ester, E. F., Anderson, D. E., Serences, J. T., & Awh, E. (2013). A neural measure of precision in visual working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 754-761.
pubmed: 23469889
pmcid: 4041615
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00357
Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). The spatiotemporal profile of cortical processing leading up to visual perception. Journal of Vision, 8(1):12, 1-12.
pubmed: 18318615
doi: 10.1167/8.1.12
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018). Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 514-538.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 847-858.
pubmed: 9627420
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030-1044.
pubmed: 1431742
Foster, J. J., Bsales, E. M., & Awh, E. (2020). Covert spatial attention speeds target individuation. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(13), 2717-2726.
pubmed: 32054678
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2962-19.2020
Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., & Lien, M. C. (2016). The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(8), 1104-1120.
pubmed: 26854530
Goller, F., Schoeberl, T., & Ansorge, U. (2020). Testing the top-down contingent capture of attention for abrupt-onset cues: Evidence from cue-elicited N2pc. Psychophysiology, 57(11), e13655.
pubmed: 32790903
doi: 10.1111/psyp.13655
Golomb, J. D. (2019). Remapping locations and features across saccades: a dual-spotlight theory of attentional updating. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 211-218.
pubmed: 31075621
pmcid: 6776727
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.018
Golomb, J. D., Nguyen-Phuc, A. Y., Mazer, J. A., McCarthy, G., & Chun, M. M. (2010a). Attentional facilitation throughout human visual cortex lingers in retinotopic coordinates after eye movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(31), 10493-10506.
pubmed: 20685992
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1546-10.2010
Golomb, J. D., Pulido, V. Z., Albrecht, A. R., Chun, M. M., & Mazer, J. A. (2010b). Robustness of the retinotopic attentional trace after eye movements. Journal of Vision, 10(3):19, 1-12.
pubmed: 20377296
doi: 10.1167/10.3.19
Golomb, J. D., L’Heureux, Z. E., & Kanwisher, N. (2014). Feature-binding errors after eye movements and shifts of attention. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1067-1078.
pubmed: 24647672
doi: 10.1177/0956797614522068
Goodbourn, P. T., & Holcombe, A. O. (2015). “Pseudoextinction”: Asymmetries in simultaneous attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 364–384.
pubmed: 25621581
Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2018). The time course of target template activation processes during preparation for visual search. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(44), 9527-9538.
pubmed: 30242053
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-18.2018
Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2020). Preparatory Template Activation during Search for Alternating Targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1-11.
Hackley, S. A., Schankin, A., Wohlschlaeger, A., & Wascher, E. (2007). Localization of temporal preparation effects via trisected reaction time. Psychophysiology, 44(2), 334-338.
pubmed: 17343715
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00500.x
Hayden, B. Y., & Gallant, J. L. (2005). Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4. Neuron, 47(5), 637-643.
pubmed: 16129394
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.020
Hilkenmeier, F., Olivers, C. N., & Scharlau, I. (2012a). Prior entry and temporal attention: Cueing affects order errors in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 180-190.
pubmed: 22082215
Hilkenmeier, F., Scharlau, I., Weiß, K., & Olivers, C. N. (2012b). The dynamics of prior entry in serial visual processing. Visual Cognition, 20(1), 48-76.
doi: 10.1080/13506285.2011.631507
Hommel, B., & Akyürek, E. G. (2005). Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: Benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(8), 1415-1433.
doi: 10.1080/02724980443000647
Hommel, B., Chapman, C. S., Cisek, P., Neyedli, H. F., Song, J. H., & Welsh, T. N. (2019). No one knows what attention is. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2288-2303.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01846-w
Hopf, J. M., Boelmans, K., Schoenfeld, M. A., Luck, S. J., & Heinze, H. J. (2004). Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(8), 1822-1832.
pubmed: 14985422
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3564-03.2004
Hopf, J. M., Luck, S. J., Boelmans, K., Schoenfeld, M. A., Boehler, C. N., Rieger, J., & Heinze, H. J. (2006). The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(13), 3532-3540.
pubmed: 16571761
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4510-05.2006
Huber-Huber, C., Ditye, T., Fernández, M. M., & Ansorge, U. (2016). Using temporally aligned event-related potentials for the investigation of attention shifts prior to and during saccades. Neuropsychologia, 92, 129-141.
pubmed: 27059211
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.035
Ibos, G., Duhamel, J. R., & Hamed, S. B. (2013). A functional hierarchy within the parietofrontal network in stimulus selection and attention control. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8359-8369.
pubmed: 23658175
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4058-12.2013
Itthipuripat, S., Garcia, J. O., Rungratsameetaweemana, N., Sprague, T. C., & Serences, J. T. (2014). Changing the spatial scope of attention alters patterns of neural gain in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(1), 112-123.
pubmed: 24381272
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3943-13.2014
Itthipuripat, S., Deering, S., & Serences, J. T. (2019). When conflict cannot be avoided: Relative contributions of early selection and frontal executive control in mitigating Stroop conflict. Cerebral Cortex, 29(12), 5037-5048.
pubmed: 30877786
pmcid: 6918928
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz042
James, W (1890). Principles of psychology. Holt.
Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 37(1), 43-75.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.000355
Kanwisher, N., & Wojciulik, E. (2000). Visual attention: insights from brain imaging. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(2), 91-100.
pubmed: 11252779
doi: 10.1038/35039043
Katsuki, F., & Constantinidis, C. (2014). Bottom-up and top-down attention: different processes and overlapping neural systems. The Neuroscientist, 20(5), 509-521.
pubmed: 24362813
doi: 10.1177/1073858413514136
Kawahara, J. I., Kumada, T., & Di Lollo, V. (2006). The attentional blink is governed by a temporary loss of control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 886-890.
doi: 10.3758/BF03194014
Keysers, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(3), 120-125.
pubmed: 11861189
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01852-0
Kiss, M., Van Velzen, J., & Eimer, M. (2008). The N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing. Psychophysiology, 45(2), 240-249.
pubmed: 17971061
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00611.x
Kiss, M., Driver, J., & Eimer, M. (2009). Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychological Science, 20(2), 245-251.
pubmed: 19175756
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02281.x
Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111(4), 880-913.
pubmed: 15482066
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.880
Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23(11), 571-579.
pubmed: 11074267
doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01657-X
Lamy, D., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. E. (2004). Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(6), 1019-1031.
pubmed: 15584812
Lamy, D., Darnell, M., Levi, A., & Bublil, C. (2018). Testing the attentional dwelling hypothesis of attentional capture. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 43.
pubmed: 31517216
pmcid: 6634340
doi: 10.5334/joc.48
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 451-468.
pubmed: 7790827
Lennie, P. (2003). The cost of cortical computation. Current Biology 13(6): 493–497.
pubmed: 12646132
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00135-0
Luck, S. J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S. A., & Desimone, R. (1997a). Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77(1), 24-42.
pubmed: 9120566
doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.24
Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., McDermott, M. T., & Ford, M. A. (1997b). Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 64-87.
pubmed: 9212722
doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0660
Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1-21.
pubmed: 33574729
doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949
Luria, R., Balaban, H., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2016). The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 62, 100-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.003
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657-672.
doi: 10.3758/BF03209251
Marti, S., & Dehaene, S. (2017). Discrete and continuous mechanisms of temporal selection in rapid visual streams. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1-13.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6
Martinez-Trujillo, J. C., & Treue, S. (2004). Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Current Biology, 14(9), 744-751.
pubmed: 15120065
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.028
Maxwell, J. W., Gaspelin, N., & Ruthruff, E. (2020). No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: evidence against a unified model of spatial attention. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01367-4 .
McLean, J. P., Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. (1983). Combining attributes in rapid serial visual presentation tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 35(1), 171-186.
doi: 10.1080/14640748308402123
Moore, T., & Fallah, M. (2004). Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(1), 152-162.
pubmed: 13679398
doi: 10.1152/jn.00741.2002
Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention of peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychologica, 69(2), 129-155.
pubmed: 3245479
doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90003-0
Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631-1647.
pubmed: 2635486
doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90144-2
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Nieuwenstein, M. R. (2006). Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 973-985.
pubmed: 16846292
Nieuwenstein, M. R., Chun, M. M., van der Lubbe, R. H., & Hooge, I.T. (2005). Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1463-1475.
pubmed: 16366802
Noudoost, B., Chang, M. H., Steinmetz, N. A., & Moore, T. (2010). Top-down control of visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 183-190.
pubmed: 20303256
pmcid: 2901796
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.003
Oberauer, K., & Lin, H. Y. (2017). An interference model of visual working memory. Psychological Review, 124(1), 21-59.
pubmed: 27869455
doi: 10.1037/rev0000044
Ogawa, T., & Komatsu, H. (2006). Neuronal dynamics of bottom-up and top-down processes in area V4 of macaque monkeys performing a visual search. Experimental Brain Research, 173(1), 1-13.
pubmed: 16506012
doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0362-5
Olivers, C. N., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115(4), 836–863.
pubmed: 18954206
doi: 10.1037/a0013395
Olivers, C. N. L., Van der Stigchel, S., & Hulleman, J. (2007). Spreading the sparing: Against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research, 71, 126–139.
pubmed: 16341546
doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0029-z
Olivers, C. N., Hilkenmeier, F., & Scharlau, I. (2011). Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(1), 53-67.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0004-7
Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Tiali, S. E. B., Vidal, J. R., Petton, M., Croize, A. C., Deman, P., Minotti, L., Bhattacharjee, M., Baciu, M., Kahane, P. & Lachaux, J. P. (2020). A real-time marker of object-based attention in the human brain. A possible component of a “gate-keeping mechanism” performing late attentional selection in the Ventro-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex. NeuroImage, 210, 116574.
pubmed: 31981780
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116574
Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 73-89.
pubmed: 22524787
pmcid: 3413263
doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525
Põder, E. (2013). Attentional gating models of object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1130-1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030575
doi: 10.1037/a0030575
Pooresmaeili, A., Poort, J., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2014). Simultaneous selection by object-based attention in visual and frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(17), 6467-6472.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316181111
Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 979-992.
pubmed: 9699304
Potter, M. C., Staub, A., & O'Connor, D. H. (2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1149-1162.
pubmed: 12421061
Potter, M. C., Wyble, B., Hagmann, C. E., & McCourt, E. S. (2014). Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(2), 270-279.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0605-z
Pratt, J., Hillis, J., & Gold, J. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 489-495.
doi: 10.3758/BF03196183
Purcell, B. A., Schall, J. D., & Woodman, G. F. (2013). On the origin of event-related potentials indexing covert attentional selection during visual search: timing of selection by macaque frontal eye field and event-related potentials during pop-out search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 109(2), 557-569.
pubmed: 23100140
doi: 10.1152/jn.00549.2012
Rademaker, R. L., Chunharas, C., & Serences, J. T. (2019). Coexisting representations of sensory and mnemonic information in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 22(8), 1336-1344.
pubmed: 31263205
pmcid: 6857532
doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0428-x
Raffone, A., Srinivasan, N., & van Leeuwen, C. (2014). The interplay of attention and consciousness in visual search, attentional blink and working memory consolidation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 20130215.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0215
Ramgir, A., & Lamy, D. (2021). Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01997-8 .
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 260-281.
pubmed: 26952739
pmcid: 4928591
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860.
pubmed: 1500880
Reeves, A., & Sperling, G. (1986). Attention gating in short-term visual memory. Psychological Review, 93(2), 180.
pubmed: 3714927
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.180
Remington, R. W., & Folk, C. L. (2001). A dissociation between attention and selection. Psychological Science, 12(6), 511-515.
pubmed: 11760140
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00394
Salahub, C. M., & Emrich, S. M. (2018). ERP evidence for temporal independence of set size and object updating in object substitution masking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(2), 387-401.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1459-6
Salthouse, T. A., & Ellis, C. L. (1980). Determinants of eye-fixation duration. The American Journal of Psychology, 207-234.
Sani, I., Santandrea, E., Morrone, M. C., & Chelazzi, L. (2017). Temporally evolving gain mechanisms of attention in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology, 118(2), 964-985.
pubmed: 28468996
pmcid: 5539452
doi: 10.1152/jn.00522.2016
Seibold, V. C., Stepper, M. Y., & Rolke, B. (2020). Temporal attention boosts perceptual effects of spatial attention and feature-based attention. Brain and Cognition, 142, 105570.
pubmed: 32447188
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105570
Seth, A. K., & Baars, B. J. (2005). Neural Darwinism and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(1), 140-168.
pubmed: 15766895
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.08.008
Shih, S. I. (2008). The attention cascade model and attentional blink. Cognitive Psychology, 56(3), 210-236.
pubmed: 17624321
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.001
Shih, S. I., & Reeves, A. (2007). Attentional capture in rapid serial visual presentation. Spatial Vision, 20(4), 301-315.
pubmed: 17594797
doi: 10.1163/156856807780919019
Simione, L., Akyürek, E. G., Vastola, V., Raffone, A., & Bowman, H. (2017). Illusions of integration are subjectively impenetrable: Phenomenological experience of Lag 1 percepts during dual-target RSVP. Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 181-192.
pubmed: 28388483
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.004
Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. (2008). Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores?. PLOS One, 3(2), e1699.
pubmed: 18301775
pmcid: 2246033
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001699
Slotnick, S. D. (2018). The experimental parameters that affect attentional modulation of the ERP C1 component. Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(1-2), 53-62.
pubmed: 28826303
doi: 10.1080/17588928.2017.1369021
Smith, P. L., & Wolfgang, B. J. (2004). The attentional dynamics of masked detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(1), 119-136.
pubmed: 14769072
doi: 10.1037/h0033788
Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2009). An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychological review, 116(2), 283–317.
Spalek, T. M., Lagroix, H. E., Yanko, M. R., & Di Lollo, V. (2012). Perception of temporal order is impaired during the time course of the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 402-413.
pubmed: 21928925
Spence, C., & Parise, C. (2010). Prior-entry: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 364-379.
pubmed: 20056554
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.001
Taatgen, N. A., Juvina, I., Schipper, M., Borst, J. P., & Martens, S. (2009). Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 1–29.
pubmed: 19217086
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.12.002
Talcott, T. N., & Gaspelin, N. (2021). Eye movements are not mandatorily preceded by the N2pc component. Psychophysiology, e13821. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13821 .
Talsma, D., White, B. J., Mathôt, S., Munoz, D. P., & Theeuwes, J. (2013). A retinotopic attentional trace after saccadic eye movements: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(9), 1563–1577.
Tamber-Rosenau, B. J., & Marois, R. (2016). Central attention is serial, but midlevel and peripheral attention are parallel—A hypothesis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1874-1888.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1171-y
Tan, M., & Wyble, B. (2015). Understanding how visual attention locks on to a location: Toward a computational model of the N 2pc component. Psychophysiology, 52(2), 199-213.
pubmed: 25252220
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12324
Tang, M. F., Ford, L., Arabzadeh, E., Enns, J. T., Visser, T. A., & Mattingley, J. B. (2020). Neural dynamics of the attentional blink revealed by encoding orientation selectivity during rapid visual presentation. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-14.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7
Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77-99.
pubmed: 20507828
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
Titchener, E. B. (1928). A textbook of Psychology. New-York: The Macmillan Company.
Töllner, T., Zehetleitner, M., Gramann, K., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex. PLoS One, 6(1), e16276.
pubmed: 21283699
pmcid: 3025013
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016276
Tootell, R. B., Hadjikhani, N., Hall, E. K., Marrett, S., Vanduffel, W., Vaughan, J. T., & Dale, A. M. (1998). The retinotopy of visual spatial attention. Neuron, 21(6), 1409-1422.
pubmed: 9883733
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80659-5
Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6(2), 171-178.
pubmed: 8725958
doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80070-5
Treisman, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353(1373), 1295-1306.
pmcid: 1692340
Treisman, A. (2014). The psychological reality of levels of processing. Levels of Processing in Human Memory, 301–330.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136.
pubmed: 7351125
doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
Vernet, M., Quentin, R., Chanes, L., Mitsumasu, A., & Valero-Cabré, A. (2014). Frontal eye field, where art thou? Anatomy, function, and non-invasive manipulation of frontal regions involved in eye movements and associated cognitive operations. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8(66), 1-24.
Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428(6984), 748-751.
pubmed: 15085132
doi: 10.1038/nature02447
Vul, E., Nieuwenstein, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2008). Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 19, 55–61.
pubmed: 18181792
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02046.x
Vul, E., Hanus, D., & Kanwisher, N. (2009). Attention as inference: Selection is probabilistic; responses are all-or-none samples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 546–560.
doi: 10.1037/a0017352
Warren, S. G., Yacoub, E., & Ghose, G. M. (2014). Featural and temporal attention selectively enhance task-appropriate representations in human primary visual cortex. Nature Communications, 5(1), 1-12.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms6643
Weaver, M. D., van Zoest, W., & Hickey, C. (2017). A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control. NeuroImage, 147, 880–894.
pubmed: 27836709
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.004
Westerberg, J. A., Schall, M. S., Maier, A., Woodman, G. F., & Schall, J. D. (2021). Laminar microcircuitry of visual cortex producing attention-associated electric fields. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459639 .
Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2011). The time course of attention: selection is transient. PLoS One, 6(11), e27661.
pubmed: 22125619
pmcid: 3220693
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027661
Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2013). Early perceptual interactions shape the time course of cueing. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 40-50.
pubmed: 23743344
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.020
Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2015). Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention. Psychological Research, 79(5), 844-860.
pubmed: 25187215
doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0605-1
Wolfe, J. M. (2014). Approaches to visual search: Feature integration theory and guided search. The Oxford Handbook of Attention, 11, 35–44.
Wolfe, J. M. (2021). Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9 .
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400(6747), 867-869.
pubmed: 10476964
doi: 10.1038/23698
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Dissociations among attention, perception, and awareness during object-substitution masking. Psychological Science, 14(6), 605-611.
pubmed: 14629693
doi: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1472.x
Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Nieuwenstein, M. (2009). The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 787-807.
pubmed: 19485692
Wyble, B., Potter, M. C., Bowman, H., & Nieuwenstein, M. (2011). Attentional episodes in visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 488–505.
doi: 10.1037/a0023612
Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2009). Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing. Nature Neuroscience, 12(1), 24-25.
pubmed: 19029890
doi: 10.1038/nn.2223
Zhou, H., & Desimone, R. (2011). Feature-based attention in the frontal eye field and area V4 during visual search. Neuron, 70(6), 1205-1217.
pubmed: 21689605
pmcid: 3490686
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.032
Zhou, H., Schafer, R. J., & Desimone, R. (2016). Pulvinar-cortex interactions in vision and attention. Neuron, 89(1), 209-220.
pubmed: 26748092
pmcid: 4723640
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.034
Zivony, A. & Eimer, M. (2020). Perceptual competition between targets and distractors determines working memory access and produces intrusion errors in RSVP tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 46(12), 1490–1510.
Zivony, A. & Eimer, M. (2021a). Distractor intrusions are the result of delayed attentional engagement: a new temporal variability account of attentional selectivity in dynamic visual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 23–41.
doi: 10.1037/xge0000789
Zivony, A. & Eimer, M. (2021b). The number of expected targets modulates access to working memory: a new unified account of lag-1 sparing and distractor intrusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000958 .
Zivony, A. & Lamy, D. (2016a). The role of dimension relevance in features’ access to response-selection mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(11), 1873-1885.
pubmed: 27505222
Zivony, A. & Lamy, D. (2016b). Attentional capture and engagement during the attentional blink: a “camera” metaphor of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(11), 1886–1902.
pubmed: 27736118
Zivony, A. & Lamy, D. (2018). Contingent attentional engagement: stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences. Psychological Science, 29, 1930-1941.
pubmed: 30285577
doi: 10.1177/0956797618799302
Zivony, A. & Lamy, D. (2021). What processes are disrupted during the attentional blink? An integrative review of event-related potential research. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01973-2 .
Zivony, A., Allon, A. S., Luria, R. & Lamy, D. (2018). Dissociating between the N2pc and attentional shifting: an attentional blink study. Neuropsychologia, 121, 153-163.
pubmed: 30419246
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.11.003