Measuring the patient experience of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: qualitative development of a novel symptom diary.
chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis
content validity
instrument development
patient-reported outcomes
qualitative research
Journal
International forum of allergy & rhinology
ISSN: 2042-6984
Titre abrégé: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101550261
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
revised:
24
11
2021
received:
22
07
2021
accepted:
14
12
2021
pubmed:
19
12
2021
medline:
27
7
2022
entrez:
18
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This qualitative study assessed the experience of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (NP) to inform the development of a novel symptom diary for clinical study use. Concept elicitation and cognitive interviews were conducted with patients who had a physician-verified diagnosis of NP and a history of intranasal corticosteroid use. Concepts were identified via open-ended and follow-up questions. Relative symptom/impact disturbance level was assessed using a scale of 0 (not at all disturbing) to 10 (extremely disturbing). Patients (n = 30) attributed numerous symptoms and impacts to NP; the most prevalent and disturbing were nasal congestion (identified by 100% of patients; average disturbance rating = 7.9), nasal blockage/obstruction (97%; 8.2), difficulty with sense of smell (97%; 7.6), facial pressure (90%; 6.2), postnasal drip (87%; 6.5), runny nose (87%; 6.2), facial pain (80%; 6.3), and headache (77%; 6.5). These symptoms, along with the impact of NP on sleep and daily activities, were included in the Nasal Polyposis Symptom Diary (NPSD). Cognitive interviews confirmed that patients understood the NPSD items and could select a response reflective of their experience at its worst over the past 24 hours using a four-point scale (none, mild, moderate, or severe). The most relevant and disturbing symptoms, according to patients with NP, were included in the NPSD. Interviews confirmed the suitability of NPSD in capturing the daily experience of patients. These findings support the content validity of the NPSD as a suitable tool for capturing NP symptoms and impacts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
This qualitative study assessed the experience of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (NP) to inform the development of a novel symptom diary for clinical study use.
METHODS
Concept elicitation and cognitive interviews were conducted with patients who had a physician-verified diagnosis of NP and a history of intranasal corticosteroid use. Concepts were identified via open-ended and follow-up questions. Relative symptom/impact disturbance level was assessed using a scale of 0 (not at all disturbing) to 10 (extremely disturbing).
RESULTS
Patients (n = 30) attributed numerous symptoms and impacts to NP; the most prevalent and disturbing were nasal congestion (identified by 100% of patients; average disturbance rating = 7.9), nasal blockage/obstruction (97%; 8.2), difficulty with sense of smell (97%; 7.6), facial pressure (90%; 6.2), postnasal drip (87%; 6.5), runny nose (87%; 6.2), facial pain (80%; 6.3), and headache (77%; 6.5). These symptoms, along with the impact of NP on sleep and daily activities, were included in the Nasal Polyposis Symptom Diary (NPSD). Cognitive interviews confirmed that patients understood the NPSD items and could select a response reflective of their experience at its worst over the past 24 hours using a four-point scale (none, mild, moderate, or severe).
CONCLUSION
The most relevant and disturbing symptoms, according to patients with NP, were included in the NPSD. Interviews confirmed the suitability of NPSD in capturing the daily experience of patients. These findings support the content validity of the NPSD as a suitable tool for capturing NP symptoms and impacts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34921526
doi: 10.1002/alr.22952
pmc: PMC9543166
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
996-1005Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy and American Rhinologic Society.
Références
Value Health. 2020 May;23(5):632-641
pubmed: 32389229
J Transl Med. 2020 Mar 24;18(1):136
pubmed: 32209102
JAMA. 1995 Jan 4;273(1):59-65
pubmed: 7996652
Rhinology. 2020 Feb 20;58(Suppl S29):1-464
pubmed: 32077450
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):967-77
pubmed: 22152165
Thorax. 2000 Oct;55 Suppl 2:S79-83
pubmed: 10992568
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Aug;12(8):996-1005
pubmed: 34921526
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018 Nov 01;9:353-367
pubmed: 30464666
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Apr 06;5:49
pubmed: 29682504
Allergy. 2004 Apr;59(4):406-14
pubmed: 15005764
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017 Feb;50(1):61-81
pubmed: 27888916
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2020 May;40(2):295-302
pubmed: 32278452
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Apr;149(4):1309-1317.e12
pubmed: 34599979
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Feb 11;14:127-134
pubmed: 33603409
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jul - Aug;8(7):2351-2359.e2
pubmed: 32361009
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):447-54
pubmed: 19793277
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88
pubmed: 22152166
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1075-83
pubmed: 19804437
Allergy. 2005 Apr;60(4):452-8
pubmed: 15727575