Psychosexual Morbidity in Women With Ovarian Cancer: Evaluation by Germline BRCA Gene Mutational Status.

BRCA Menopaus* Ovar* Psychosex*

Journal

Sexual medicine
ISSN: 2050-1161
Titre abrégé: Sex Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631053

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 19 06 2021
revised: 01 11 2021
accepted: 03 11 2021
pubmed: 19 12 2021
medline: 19 12 2021
entrez: 18 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Up to 75% of women with ovarian cancer experience psychosexual morbidity and approximately 15-20% of women with ovarian cancer have a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). However, psychosexual morbidity remains unexplored in women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer. Given their younger age, genetic diagnosis, breast cancer risk, and increased prevalence of surgically-induced menopause, we aim to assess whether women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer experience distinct psychosexual morbidity. Psychosexual morbidity was investigated in 2 cohorts of women with ovarian cancer: women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer vs women with gBRCA wildtype (gBRCAwt) ovarian cancer. Between August 2019 and March 2020, women with high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary, Fallopian tube or primary peritoneum were approached in clinic or telephoned and invited to take part. Exclusion criteria included: women with alternative histology; women admitted from clinic; and women who lacked capacity to independently complete the questionnaire. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and background information were collected at a single time-point per patient. Scores below 26.55 were interpreted to suggest psychosexual dysfunction. Responses including total and domain FSFI scores, self-reported psychosexual problems and interest in psychosexual support were compared. Of 103 women approached, 53% returned questionnaires. In this exploratory analysis, women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer were significantly younger (51-60 years vs 61-70 years, gBRCAwt, P = .010). There was a trend towards increased prevalence of surgical menopause (57% vs 27%, P = .097) and breast surgery (53% vs 22%, P = .132, gBRCAm vs gBRCAwt, respectively). Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer scored higher in the FSFI questionnaire, particularly women under 60 years (15.1 vs 2.7, P = .070), approaching significance. Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer expressed more interest for face-to-face services (P = .018), especially psychosexual therapy (65% vs 30%) and more often felt the service was insufficient, approaching significance (71% vs 44%, gBRCAm vs gBRCAwt, respectively, P = .076). Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer are younger, express more interest for specialist psychosexual support and potentially different psychosexual problems, warranting further exploration. Logue C, Pugh J, Foden P, et al., Psychosexual Morbidity in Women With Ovarian Cancer: Evaluation by Germline BRCA Gene Mutational Status. Sex Med 2022;10:100465.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34922303
pii: S2050-1161(21)00145-8
doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100465
pmc: PMC8847828
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100465

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 05;17(3):
pubmed: 32033334
Sex Med. 2019 Dec;7(4):530-539
pubmed: 31501030
Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):81-90
pubmed: 8901370
J Sex Marital Ther. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1):1-20
pubmed: 15841702
Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4606-18
pubmed: 22359250
J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77
pubmed: 11832252
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1409-21
pubmed: 26577764
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143 Suppl 2:147-152
pubmed: 30306581
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Nov;38(6):699-708
pubmed: 22037332
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):395-403
pubmed: 28411144
Acta Oncol. 1989;28(1):13-8
pubmed: 2706129
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov;143(2):367-370
pubmed: 27531571
Health Psychol. 2009 Jul;28(4):510-8
pubmed: 19594276
Lancet. 2014 Oct 11;384(9951):1376-88
pubmed: 24767708
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):1983-1989
pubmed: 33115791
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Aug;18(4):411-8
pubmed: 24731853
J Sex Med. 2020 Jan;17(1):17-25
pubmed: 31735616
Eur J Cancer. 2003 Jul;39(10):1402-8
pubmed: 12826043

Auteurs

Chloe A Logue (CA)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: chloe.logue@waikatodhb.health.nz.

Julia Pugh (J)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Philip Foden (P)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Reem D Mahmood (RD)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, School of Medical Sciences, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Robert D Morgan (RD)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, School of Medical Sciences, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Claire Mitchell (C)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, School of Medical Sciences, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Jurjees Hasan (J)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, School of Medical Sciences, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Andrew R Clamp (AR)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, School of Medical Sciences, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Gordon C Jayson (GC)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, School of Medical Sciences, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Classifications MeSH