The upside: coping and psychological resilience in Australian adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Adolescent Coping Covid-19 Pandemic Resilience Youth mental health

Journal

Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
ISSN: 1753-2000
Titre abrégé: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101297974

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 18 08 2021
accepted: 13 12 2021
entrez: 19 12 2021
pubmed: 20 12 2021
medline: 20 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Since the COVID-19 outbreak, few studies have investigated the positive psychological consequences on young people. This study examined resilience, positive experiences, and coping strategies reported by Australian adolescents during COVID-19. Self-report surveys were administered online to a sample of 760 Australian adolescents aged 12-18 years. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to assess resilience, positive experiences, and coping strategies. Exploratory regression analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between resilience and demographics and mental illness history, as well as between resilience and positive experiences. Overall, adolescents were somewhat resilient (M = 20.93, SD = 8.29). They reported positive experiences during COVID-19, including increased empathy, compassion, gratitude, and connection with others, and reported using a range of active coping strategies. Having a mental illness history and identification as female or non-binary gender were associated with lower resilience (Bs > 2.82, ps < 0.001). Further, resilience was associated with decreased psychological distress (OR = 0.89, p < 0.001) and with increased positive experiences (ORs > 1.03, ps < 0.001). Our results indicate that Australian adolescents commonly reported positive experiences and used active coping strategies during COVID-19. Some young people demonstrated higher levels of resilience and were able to make the most out of an unpredictable situation that severely disrupted their daily routine. However, further prospective research using longitudinal methods is necessary to examine causal relationships between variables. An implication of our findings is that resilience-building programs for adolescents may be effective in increasing adaptability after adversity (e.g., climate change, bushfires, pandemics).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Since the COVID-19 outbreak, few studies have investigated the positive psychological consequences on young people. This study examined resilience, positive experiences, and coping strategies reported by Australian adolescents during COVID-19.
METHODS METHODS
Self-report surveys were administered online to a sample of 760 Australian adolescents aged 12-18 years. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to assess resilience, positive experiences, and coping strategies. Exploratory regression analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between resilience and demographics and mental illness history, as well as between resilience and positive experiences.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, adolescents were somewhat resilient (M = 20.93, SD = 8.29). They reported positive experiences during COVID-19, including increased empathy, compassion, gratitude, and connection with others, and reported using a range of active coping strategies. Having a mental illness history and identification as female or non-binary gender were associated with lower resilience (Bs > 2.82, ps < 0.001). Further, resilience was associated with decreased psychological distress (OR = 0.89, p < 0.001) and with increased positive experiences (ORs > 1.03, ps < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that Australian adolescents commonly reported positive experiences and used active coping strategies during COVID-19. Some young people demonstrated higher levels of resilience and were able to make the most out of an unpredictable situation that severely disrupted their daily routine. However, further prospective research using longitudinal methods is necessary to examine causal relationships between variables. An implication of our findings is that resilience-building programs for adolescents may be effective in increasing adaptability after adversity (e.g., climate change, bushfires, pandemics).

Identifiants

pubmed: 34922575
doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00432-z
pii: 10.1186/s13034-021-00432-z
pmc: PMC8684334
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

77

Subventions

Organisme : NHMRC Senior Principal Fellowship
ID : 115614

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:121-128
pubmed: 32818775
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249678
pubmed: 33793672
Advers Resil Sci. 2020 Jun 25;:1-12
pubmed: 32838305
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Jan;50(1):44-57
pubmed: 33108542
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;67(5):649-652
pubmed: 32933836
Emotion. 2017 Apr;17(3):450-458
pubmed: 27819450
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Oct;292:113307
pubmed: 32707216
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020 Dec;51:101845
pubmed: 32929399
Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):216-269
pubmed: 12696840
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 28;:
pubmed: 33913036
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 23;11:559951
pubmed: 33071884
Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar;27(1):228-38
pubmed: 25222434
Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):227-38
pubmed: 11315249
Dev Psychopathol. 2007 Summer;19(3):921-30
pubmed: 17705908
Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;143(9):939-991
pubmed: 28616996
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Dec;67(6):747-755
pubmed: 33041204
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:227-57
pubmed: 21943168
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 01;10:72
pubmed: 30774610
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Aug;55(8):2128-2134
pubmed: 32530552
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Apr;17(2):59-62
pubmed: 34908968
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;56(10):813-824
pubmed: 28942803
Child Dev. 2014 Jan-Feb;85(1):6-20
pubmed: 24341286
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Feb 04;9:8
pubmed: 21294858
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020 Dec;51(6):925-933
pubmed: 32086664
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;64(9):647-657
pubmed: 30602296
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113264
pubmed: 32622172
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9
pubmed: 12578436
Psychol Med. 2020 Jun 23;:1-10
pubmed: 32571438
J Trauma Stress. 2007 Dec;20(6):1019-28
pubmed: 18157881
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560
pubmed: 32304649
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jun 08;9:297
pubmed: 27278796
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Nov;1(11):784-790
pubmed: 31024125
Child Dev. 2000 May-Jun;71(3):543-62
pubmed: 10953923
Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):357-62
pubmed: 12622315
Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Mar-Apr;52(2):218-24
pubmed: 21295229
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;4(8):634-640
pubmed: 32540024
J Community Psychol. 2020 Nov;48(8):2740-2752
pubmed: 33001455
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Aug;43(12):1007-12
pubmed: 19264325
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 May;23(2):493-506
pubmed: 23786691
J Infect. 2006 Aug;53(2):114-24
pubmed: 16343636
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 16;15(10):e0240962
pubmed: 33064778
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Jun;73:102239
pubmed: 32502806
Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76
pubmed: 12214795

Auteurs

Joanne R Beames (JR)

Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. j.beames@blackdog.org.au.

Sophie H Li (SH)

Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Jill M Newby (JM)

Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Kate Maston (K)

Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Helen Christensen (H)

Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Aliza Werner-Seidler (A)

Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Classifications MeSH