Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 2213-2619
Titre abrégé: Lancet Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
received:
11
06
2021
revised:
08
10
2021
accepted:
12
10
2021
pubmed:
20
12
2021
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
19
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise agents for phase 3 trials. In this randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, parallel-group, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial (CATALYST), we recruited patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of 40 mg/L or greater, at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with equal probability to usual care or usual care plus a single intravenous dose of namilumab (150 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified by care location within the hospital (ward vs intensive care unit [ICU]). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was improvement in inflammation, measured by CRP concentration over time, analysed using Bayesian multilevel models. This trial is now complete and is registered with ISRCTN, 40580903. Between June 15, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021, we screened 299 patients and 146 were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (n=54), namilumab (n=57), or infliximab (n=35). For the primary outcome, 45 patients in the usual care group were compared with 52 in the namilumab group, and 29 in the usual care group were compared with 28 in the infliximab group. The probabilities that the interventions were superior to usual care alone in reducing CRP concentration over time were 97% for namilumab and 15% for infliximab; the point estimates for treatment-time interactions were -0·09 (95% CI -0·19 to 0·00) for namilumab and 0·06 (-0·05 to 0·17) for infliximab. 134 adverse events occurred in 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the namilumab group compared with 145 in 29 (54%) of 54 in the usual care group. 102 adverse events occurred in 20 (69%) of 29 patients in the infliximab group compared with 112 in 17 (50%) of 34 in the usual care group. Death occurred in six (11%) patients in the namilumab group compared with ten (19%) in the usual care group, and in four (14%) in the infliximab group compared with five (15%) in the usual care group. Namilumab, but not infliximab, showed proof-of-concept evidence for reduction in inflammation-as measured by CRP concentration-in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Namilumab should be prioritised for further investigation in COVID-19. Medical Research Council.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise agents for phase 3 trials.
METHODS
In this randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, parallel-group, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial (CATALYST), we recruited patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of 40 mg/L or greater, at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with equal probability to usual care or usual care plus a single intravenous dose of namilumab (150 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified by care location within the hospital (ward vs intensive care unit [ICU]). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was improvement in inflammation, measured by CRP concentration over time, analysed using Bayesian multilevel models. This trial is now complete and is registered with ISRCTN, 40580903.
FINDINGS
Between June 15, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021, we screened 299 patients and 146 were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (n=54), namilumab (n=57), or infliximab (n=35). For the primary outcome, 45 patients in the usual care group were compared with 52 in the namilumab group, and 29 in the usual care group were compared with 28 in the infliximab group. The probabilities that the interventions were superior to usual care alone in reducing CRP concentration over time were 97% for namilumab and 15% for infliximab; the point estimates for treatment-time interactions were -0·09 (95% CI -0·19 to 0·00) for namilumab and 0·06 (-0·05 to 0·17) for infliximab. 134 adverse events occurred in 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the namilumab group compared with 145 in 29 (54%) of 54 in the usual care group. 102 adverse events occurred in 20 (69%) of 29 patients in the infliximab group compared with 112 in 17 (50%) of 34 in the usual care group. Death occurred in six (11%) patients in the namilumab group compared with ten (19%) in the usual care group, and in four (14%) in the infliximab group compared with five (15%) in the usual care group.
INTERPRETATION
Namilumab, but not infliximab, showed proof-of-concept evidence for reduction in inflammation-as measured by CRP concentration-in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Namilumab should be prioritised for further investigation in COVID-19.
FUNDING
Medical Research Council.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34922649
pii: S2213-2600(21)00460-4
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00460-4
pmc: PMC8676420
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Infliximab
B72HH48FLU
namilumab
MED485W763
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
255-266Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_20007
Pays : United Kingdom
Investigateurs
Bryan Williams
(B)
Rebecca Turner
(R)
Vincenzo Libri
(V)
Francis Mussai
(F)
Gary Middleton
(G)
Sarah Bowden
(S)
Mansoor Bangash
(M)
Fang Gao-Smith
(F)
Jaimin Patel
(J)
Elizabeth Sapey
(E)
Mark Thomas
(M)
Mark Coles
(M)
Peter Watkinson
(P)
Naj Rahman
(N)
Brian Angus
(B)
Alexander J Mentzer
(AJ)
Alex Novak
(A)
Marc Feldman
(M)
Alex Richter
(A)
Sian Faustini
(S)
Camilla Bathurst
(C)
Joseph Van de Wiel
(J)
Susie Mee
(S)
Karen James
(K)
Bushra Rahman
(B)
Karen Turner
(K)
Adam Hill
(A)
Anthony Gordon
(A)
Christina Yap
(C)
Michael Matthay
(M)
Danny McAuley
(D)
Andrew Hall
(A)
Paul Dark
(P)
Andrew McMichael
(A)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests BAF reports consultancy for Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, Galapagos, and Janssen and research funding from Servier and Galapagos. MR is currently undertaking a Senior Clinical Fellowship financed by Roche. PK reports consultancy for Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca, and research funding from Bayer and Pfizer. DR is a former employee of GlaxoSmithKline. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Lancet. 2021 May 01;397(10285):1637-1645
pubmed: 33933206
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 9;383(2):120-128
pubmed: 32437596
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Mar;10(3):237-246
pubmed: 34863332
Nat Commun. 2015 Jun 16;6:7375
pubmed: 26077231
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e050202
pubmed: 34764169
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jun;20(6):355-362
pubmed: 32376901
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):822-830
pubmed: 32559419
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):e192-e197
pubmed: 32539990
Genome Med. 2021 Apr 20;13(1):64
pubmed: 33879239
Sci Immunol. 2021 Mar 10;6(57):
pubmed: 33692097
Eur J Immunol. 2001 Sep;31(9):2566-73
pubmed: 11536154
JAMA. 2021 Aug 10;326(6):499-518
pubmed: 34228774
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
J Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;177(1):107-15
pubmed: 9419177
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):497-511
pubmed: 33264556
Cell Host Microbe. 2016 Feb 10;19(2):181-93
pubmed: 26867177
J Exp Med. 2008 Oct 27;205(11):2491-7
pubmed: 18936235
Med (N Y). 2020 Dec 18;1(1):90-102
pubmed: 33294881
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 11;74(3):479-489
pubmed: 33988226
Eur Respir J. 2022 Oct 13;:
pubmed: 36229048
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 29;11(1):7052
pubmed: 33782412
Sci Immunol. 2021 Feb 23;6(56):
pubmed: 33622974
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7848):92-98
pubmed: 33307546
Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;3(6):e410-e418
pubmed: 33754144
Cell. 2020 Sep 17;182(6):1419-1440.e23
pubmed: 32810438
Crit Care. 2020 Jul 17;24(1):444
pubmed: 32680535
Lancet Rheumatol. 2020 Aug;2(8):e465-e473
pubmed: 32835256
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Nov;95(11):2382-2394
pubmed: 33153629