Is sarcopenia a missed factor in the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer?


Journal

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 11 11 2021
revised: 13 12 2021
accepted: 14 12 2021
pubmed: 20 12 2021
medline: 9 2 2022
entrez: 19 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sarcopenia has emerged as an important parameter to predict outcomes and treatment toxicity. However, limited data are available to assess sarcopenia prevalence in metastatic breast cancer and to evaluate its management. The SCAN study was a cross-sectional multicenter French study that aimed to estimate sarcopenia prevalence in a real-life sample of metastatic cancer patients. Sarcopenia was identified by low muscle mass (estimated from the skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar, via computed tomography) and low muscle strength (defined by handgrip strength). Three populations were distinguished based on EWGSOP criteria: a sarcopenic group with low muscle mass AND strength, a pre-sarcopenic group with low muscle mass OR strength and a normal group with high muscle mass AND strength. Among 766 included patients, 139 patients with breast cancer and median age of 61.2 years (29.9-97.8 years) were evaluable; 29.5% were sarcopenic and 41.0% were pre-sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients were older (P < 0.01), had a worse PS-score (P < 0.05), and a higher number of metastatic sites (P < 0.01), the majority being hepatic and bone. A moderate agreement between the oncologist's diagnosis and sarcopenia evaluation by muscle mass and strength was recognized (Cohen's kappa = 0.45). No associations were found between sarcopenia and adverse event occurrence in the 12 patients for whom these were reported. Sarcopenic patients were underdiagnosed and nutritional care and physical activity were less proposed. It is necessary to evaluate sarcopenia due to its impact on patient prognosis, and its utility in guiding patient management in metastatic breast cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Sarcopenia has emerged as an important parameter to predict outcomes and treatment toxicity. However, limited data are available to assess sarcopenia prevalence in metastatic breast cancer and to evaluate its management.
METHODS METHODS
The SCAN study was a cross-sectional multicenter French study that aimed to estimate sarcopenia prevalence in a real-life sample of metastatic cancer patients. Sarcopenia was identified by low muscle mass (estimated from the skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar, via computed tomography) and low muscle strength (defined by handgrip strength). Three populations were distinguished based on EWGSOP criteria: a sarcopenic group with low muscle mass AND strength, a pre-sarcopenic group with low muscle mass OR strength and a normal group with high muscle mass AND strength.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 766 included patients, 139 patients with breast cancer and median age of 61.2 years (29.9-97.8 years) were evaluable; 29.5% were sarcopenic and 41.0% were pre-sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients were older (P < 0.01), had a worse PS-score (P < 0.05), and a higher number of metastatic sites (P < 0.01), the majority being hepatic and bone. A moderate agreement between the oncologist's diagnosis and sarcopenia evaluation by muscle mass and strength was recognized (Cohen's kappa = 0.45). No associations were found between sarcopenia and adverse event occurrence in the 12 patients for whom these were reported. Sarcopenic patients were underdiagnosed and nutritional care and physical activity were less proposed.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
It is necessary to evaluate sarcopenia due to its impact on patient prognosis, and its utility in guiding patient management in metastatic breast cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34923226
pii: S0960-9776(21)01021-3
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.014
pmc: PMC8693346
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

84-90

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. All authors were remunerated for their participation as investigators in the SCAN study.

Auteurs

Elise Deluche (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France. Electronic address: elise.deluche@chu-limoges.fr.

Denis Lachatre (D)

Department of Radiology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.

Mario Di Palma (M)

Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France.

Hélène Simon (H)

Department of Medical Oncology, Morvan Hospital, Brest, France.

Valentin Tissot (V)

Department of Radiology, Morvan Hospital, Brest, France.

Damien Vansteene (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Pays de la Loire, Nantes, Saint Herblain, France.

Philippe Meingan (P)

Department of Radiology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Pays de la Loire, Nantes, Saint Herblain, France.

Alexis Mohebi (A)

Department of Radiology, RPO, Institut du sein Henri Hartmann, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

Grégory Lenczner (G)

Department of Radiology, RPO, Institut du sein Henri Hartmann, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

Francois Pigneur (F)

Department of Radiology, Henri Mondor University Hospitals, AP-HP, Créteil, France.

Francois Goldwasser (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, CARPEM, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

Bruno Raynard (B)

Transversal Unit of Dietetics and Nutrition, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH