Improve in-depth immunological risk assessment to optimize genetic-compatibility and clinical outcomes in child and adolescent recipients of parental donor kidney transplants: protocol for the INCEPTION study.
Adolescents
Allograft loss
Antibody
Children
Human leukocyte antigen
Immunological profile
Kidney transplant
Parental donor
Rejection
Journal
BMC nephrology
ISSN: 1471-2369
Titre abrégé: BMC Nephrol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967793
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 12 2021
19 12 2021
Historique:
received:
22
09
2021
accepted:
23
11
2021
entrez:
20
12
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
11
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Parental donor kidney transplantation is the most common treatment option for children and adolescents with kidney failure. Emerging data from observational studies have reported improved short- and medium-term allograft outcomes in recipients of paternal compared to maternal donors. The INCEPTION study aims to identify potential differences in immunological compatibility between maternal and paternal donor kidneys and ascertain how this affects kidney allograft outcomes in children and adolescents with kidney failure. This longitudinal observational study will recruit kidney transplant recipients aged ≤18 years who have received a parental donor kidney transplant across 4 countries (Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom and the Netherlands) between 1990 and 2020. High resolution human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing of both recipients and corresponding parental donors will be undertaken, to provide an in-depth assessment of immunological compatibility. The primary outcome is a composite of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA), biopsy-proven acute rejection or allograft loss up to 60-months post-transplantation. Secondary outcomes are de novo DSA, biopsy-proven acute rejection, acute or chronic antibody mediated rejection or Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) score of > 1 on allograft biopsy post-transplant, allograft function, proteinuria and allograft loss. Using principal component analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression modelling, we will determine the associations between defined sets of immunological and clinical parameters that may identify risk stratification for the primary and secondary outcome measures among young people accepting a parental donor kidney for transplantation. This study design will allow us to specifically investigate the relative importance of accepting a maternal compared to paternal donor, for families deciding on the best option for donation. The INCEPTION study findings will explore potentially differential immunological risks of maternal and paternal donor kidneys for transplantation among children and adolescents. Our study will provide the evidence base underpinning the selection of parental donor in order to achieve the best projected long-term kidney transplant and overall health outcomes for children and adolescents, a recognized vulnerable population. The INCEPTION study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, with the trial registration number of ACTRN12620000911998 (14th September 2020).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Parental donor kidney transplantation is the most common treatment option for children and adolescents with kidney failure. Emerging data from observational studies have reported improved short- and medium-term allograft outcomes in recipients of paternal compared to maternal donors. The INCEPTION study aims to identify potential differences in immunological compatibility between maternal and paternal donor kidneys and ascertain how this affects kidney allograft outcomes in children and adolescents with kidney failure.
METHODS
This longitudinal observational study will recruit kidney transplant recipients aged ≤18 years who have received a parental donor kidney transplant across 4 countries (Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom and the Netherlands) between 1990 and 2020. High resolution human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing of both recipients and corresponding parental donors will be undertaken, to provide an in-depth assessment of immunological compatibility. The primary outcome is a composite of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA), biopsy-proven acute rejection or allograft loss up to 60-months post-transplantation. Secondary outcomes are de novo DSA, biopsy-proven acute rejection, acute or chronic antibody mediated rejection or Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) score of > 1 on allograft biopsy post-transplant, allograft function, proteinuria and allograft loss. Using principal component analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression modelling, we will determine the associations between defined sets of immunological and clinical parameters that may identify risk stratification for the primary and secondary outcome measures among young people accepting a parental donor kidney for transplantation. This study design will allow us to specifically investigate the relative importance of accepting a maternal compared to paternal donor, for families deciding on the best option for donation.
DISCUSSION
The INCEPTION study findings will explore potentially differential immunological risks of maternal and paternal donor kidneys for transplantation among children and adolescents. Our study will provide the evidence base underpinning the selection of parental donor in order to achieve the best projected long-term kidney transplant and overall health outcomes for children and adolescents, a recognized vulnerable population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The INCEPTION study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, with the trial registration number of ACTRN12620000911998 (14th September 2020).
Identifiants
pubmed: 34923958
doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02619-0
pii: 10.1186/s12882-021-02619-0
pmc: PMC8684542
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
416Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Transplantation. 2002 Nov 27;74(10):1377-81
pubmed: 12451234
Transplantation. 2009 Sep 27;88(6):791-8
pubmed: 19920778
Transplantation. 1994 Mar 27;57(6):857-9
pubmed: 8154032
Pediatr Transplant. 2010 Nov;14(7):887-90
pubmed: 20667033
Transplantation. 2015 May;99(5):1043-50
pubmed: 25539466
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 2;341(23):1725-30
pubmed: 10580071
Hum Immunol. 2002 May;63(5):339-52
pubmed: 11975978
Tissue Antigens. 2014 Jun;83(6):391-400
pubmed: 24828056
Transplantation. 2011 Jan 27;91(2):183-90
pubmed: 21079553
Child Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec;12(6):391-405
pubmed: 16952886
Kidney Int. 1991 Sep;40(3):514-24
pubmed: 1787648
HLA. 2020 Jul;96(1):43-51
pubmed: 32227681
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Nov;4(11):1832-43
pubmed: 19820136
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Feb;104(2):134-140
pubmed: 30018070
J Immunol. 2018 Dec 15;201(12):3780-3792
pubmed: 30429288
Hum Immunol. 2011 Nov;72(11):1049-59
pubmed: 21840357
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Mar;14(3):773-9
pubmed: 12595515
Pediatr Transplant. 2018 Nov;22(7):e13265
pubmed: 29992708
Transpl Immunol. 2013 Jun;28(4):148-53
pubmed: 23665534
Kidney Int. 1997 Jan;51(1):310-6
pubmed: 8995748
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4):753-60
pubmed: 18294345
Hum Immunol. 2004 Jan;65(1):13-9
pubmed: 14700591
Transplantation. 1984 Apr;37(4):340-4
pubmed: 6369661
Hum Immunol. 2014 Nov;75(11):1097-103
pubmed: 25305456
Transplantation. 1994 Dec 15;58(11):1195-8
pubmed: 7992362
Hum Immunol. 2007 Jan;68(1):12-25
pubmed: 17207708
Transpl Int. 2019 Jul;32(7):751-761
pubmed: 30801866
Hum Immunol. 2002 May;63(5):353-63
pubmed: 11975979
Immunology. 2018 Jul;154(3):394-406
pubmed: 29315598
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12
pubmed: 19414839
Transplantation. 2015 Feb;99(2):385-90
pubmed: 25606786
Hum Immunol. 2013 Mar;74(3):290-6
pubmed: 23232063
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15(1):137-48
pubmed: 25521856
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1235-7
pubmed: 25388221
Am J Transplant. 2013 Dec;13(12):3114-22
pubmed: 24164958
J Immunol. 2003 Nov 15;171(10):5554-61
pubmed: 14607963
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jul;16(7):2139-47
pubmed: 26755448
Hum Immunol. 2019 Feb;80(2):103-106
pubmed: 30458204
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Mar;20(3):629-37
pubmed: 19158356
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):463-70
pubmed: 25617430
Kidney Int. 2016 Mar;89(3):659-65
pubmed: 26880459
Transplantation. 2018 Nov;102(11):1795-1814
pubmed: 30028786
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 Mar;9(3):482-7
pubmed: 9513912
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Jan;24(1):304-8
pubmed: 18840897
Hum Immunol. 2006 Nov;67(11):847-62
pubmed: 17145365
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1657-64
pubmed: 9834302
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 8;344(10):726-31
pubmed: 11236776
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e297
pubmed: 17941715
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Aug;21(8):1398-406
pubmed: 20634297