Instituting a Green Zone for Elective Surgery During the Second Wave of COVID-19.

covid-19 elective surgery green zone morbidity mortality

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
accepted: 15 11 2021
entrez: 20 12 2021
pubmed: 21 12 2021
medline: 21 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Objective Elective surgery came to a standstill during the first wave of COVID-19. The safe resumption of elective surgery with COVID-19 prevalent in the community remains a significant challenge. The aim of this study was to look into the outcomes of elective general surgery in a dedicated 'Green Zone (GZ)' during the second wave of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. Method A 'Green Zone' pathway, meant to provide a COVID-free environment, was created. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was done on consecutive patients who underwent an elective general surgical procedure at a single NHS trust over a six-month period (September 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021). The primary outcome was 30-day COVID-19 mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day non-COVID-19 mortality, readmissions, and complications. Results The study included 331 patients with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range, IQR, 41-67); 169 (51%) were females. The majority of the patients were American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 2 (ASA 2; n=177, 53%) followed by ASA 3 (n=76, 23%). Forty-seven patients (14%) had been shielding earlier in the year. Most of the cases were day cases (n=224, 67%). There was no 30-day COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 mortality. One patient developed COVID-19 three weeks after the index operation. Thirty-day readmission and complication rate were 4% (n=14) and 6% (n=21). Most of the complications were Clavien-Dindo grade 2 (n=10, 3%) followed by an equal number of grades 1 and 3b (n=5, 1.5%). Conclusion This study has shown that a dedicated 'Green Zone' elective operating pathway is safe and feasible provided a balanced risk assessment approach is adopted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34926055
doi: 10.7759/cureus.19584
pmc: PMC8672239
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e19584

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021, Iqbal et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Lancet. 2020 Jul 4;396(10243):27-38
pubmed: 32479829
Br J Surg. 2020 Aug;107(9):1091-1093
pubmed: 32383479
Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1454-1464
pubmed: 34371522
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 05;21:100331
pubmed: 32292899
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1440-1449
pubmed: 32395848
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m1106
pubmed: 32188602
Int J Surg. 2020 Jul;79:156-161
pubmed: 32447002
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:57-65
pubmed: 33122153
Int J Surg. 2020 Jul;79:180-188
pubmed: 32454253
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov;59:245-250
pubmed: 33042534
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96
pubmed: 19638912
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Aug;127(2):196-204
pubmed: 34148732
Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):1250-1261
pubmed: 32350857

Auteurs

Muhammad Rafaih Iqbal (MR)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Subiksha Subramonian (S)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Kabir Matwala (K)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Catherine Morrison (C)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Stavros Karamanakos (S)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Samer-Ul Haque (SU)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Dennis Wayne Chicken (DW)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Bryony Lovett (B)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Sarah-Jane Walton (SJ)

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, GBR.

Classifications MeSH