Current state of hybrid solutions for aortic arch aneurysms.

Hybrid aneurysm aortic arch dissection endovascular

Journal

Annals of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 2225-319X
Titre abrégé: Ann Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101605877

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 02 09 2021
accepted: 27 10 2021
entrez: 20 12 2021
pubmed: 21 12 2021
medline: 21 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Since its inception in the early 2000s, hybrid arch repair (HAR) has evolved from a novel approach to a well-established treatment modality for aortic arch pathology in appropriately selected patients. HAR procedures have been proposed as a means to circumvent the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with open total arch replacement. These procedures, all of which remain off-label applications of approved endograft technology, combine more conventional open surgical techniques, to create endograft landing zones, with thoracic endovascular aortic repair to exclude the aortic pathology from the circulation. The current classification system for HAR was proposed in 2013 and consists of three types, designated by the Roman numerals I, II and III. The current system has become outdated, however, with the advent of newer technologies, and herein we propose a new, updated classification system that is more encompassing with regards to the broad array of options available to treat aortic arch disease. Likewise, an institutional algorithm to guide patient and operative selection for HAR is presented. Patients are considered for HAR if they have either high-risk comorbidities or high-risk anatomy, with an important feature of the algorithm being that any decisions about repair strategy should be made by a surgical team with expertise in both open and endovascular techniques. Despite being performed for nearly two decades, the evidence around HAR consists mainly of single center series (level B-C evidence) with no randomized controlled trials. The data suggest HAR to be a safe alternative to open repair with acceptable short and mid-term results. As we as aortic surgeons continue to move towards less invasive approaches, both conventional open and hybrid techniques will remain important tools in the toolbox for arch repair, although the advent of multi-branched arch endografts will almost certainly reduce the extent of open or hybrid repair in many patients and eliminate it altogether in others.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34926177
doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-taes-168
pii: acs-10-06-731
pmc: PMC8640885
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

731-743

Informations de copyright

2021 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: GCH: Terumo Aortic: speaker, consultant, clinical trial principal investigator; W. L. Gore and Associates: speaker, consultant, clinical trial principal investigator. The other author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov;110(5):1469-1474
pubmed: 32535042
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3 Suppl):S85-90
pubmed: 23260461
Heart. 2021 Feb 4;:
pubmed: 33541853
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):655-67; discussion 666-7
pubmed: 23186868
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 6;55(14):e27-e129
pubmed: 20359588
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;2(3):247-60
pubmed: 23977592
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct;106(4):1136-1142
pubmed: 29775605
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Dec;88(6):1882-7; discussion 1887-8
pubmed: 19932255
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb;63(2):323-31
pubmed: 26518097
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:601-609
pubmed: 33227479
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):921-9
pubmed: 24360582
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):9-20.e3
pubmed: 28216358
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;24(4):328-35
pubmed: 17938601
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;101(6):2224-30
pubmed: 26794885
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1229-1236
pubmed: 32035781
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov;60(5):1196-1203
pubmed: 24973286
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;61(6):938-944
pubmed: 33773906
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Dec;12(4):298-319
pubmed: 19033271
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 30;60(2):297-304
pubmed: 33939801
Innovations (Phila). 2020 Nov/Dec;15(6):506-512
pubmed: 33108237
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Sep;126(3):916-8
pubmed: 14502197
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;58(2):502-11
pubmed: 23697513
Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):997-1003
pubmed: 30973389
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):701-709
pubmed: 30528402
Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(6):663-6
pubmed: 22199429
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 25;60(13):1156-62
pubmed: 22958956
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;43:315.e1-315.e4
pubmed: 28479429
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;52(3):492-498
pubmed: 28460021
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Dec;90(6):1812-6; discussion 1816-7
pubmed: 21095316
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Sep;54(3):295-302
pubmed: 28754428
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;159(4):1228-1230
pubmed: 31280896
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):186-191.e1
pubmed: 24183336
J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1255-62
pubmed: 22265798
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May;7(3):443-450
pubmed: 30155426

Auteurs

G Chad Hughes (GC)

Duke University Medical Center, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Andrew Vekstein (A)

Duke University Medical Center, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Classifications MeSH