Impact of Citrus Pulp or Inulin on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolites, Barrier, and Immune Function of Weaned Piglets.
barrier function
citrus pulp
gut morphology
inflammation
intestinal health
inulin
metabolites
microbiota
Journal
Frontiers in nutrition
ISSN: 2296-861X
Titre abrégé: Front Nutr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101642264
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
01
2021
accepted:
25
10
2021
entrez:
20
12
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
21
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We investigated the use of citrus pulp (CP) as a novel prebiotic capable of exerting microbiota and immunomodulating capacities to alleviate weaning stress. Inulin (IN), a well-known prebiotic, was used for comparison. Hundred and 28 male weaned piglets of 21 days old were assigned to 32 pens of 4 piglets each. Piglets were assigned to one of the four treatments, i.e., control, IN supplemented at 0.2% (IN0.2%), and CP supplemented either at 0.2% (CP0.2%) or at 2% (CP2%). On d10-11 and d31-32 post-weaning, one pig per pen was euthanized for intestinal sampling to evaluate the growth performance, chyme characteristics, small intestinal morphology, colonic inflammatory response and barrier integrity, metabolite profiles [gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)], and microbial populations. The IN treatment and the two CP treatments induced higher small intestinal villus height to crypt depth ratios in comparison with the control diet at both sampling times. All treatments decreased acidic goblet cell absolute counts in the crypts in comparison to the control diet of the duodenum on d10-11 and d31-32. The gene expression of β-defensin 2 was downregulated in colonic tissues following the IN and CP2% inclusion on d31-32. On d31-32, piglets fed with IN and CP0.2% showed lower mRNA levels of occludin and claudin-3, respectively. Not surprisingly, flavonoids were observed in the colon in the CP treatments. Increased colonic acetate proportions on d10-11, at the expense of branched-chain fatty acid (BCFA) levels, were observed following the CP2% supplementation compared to the control diet, inferring a reduction of proteolytic fermentation in the hindgut. The beneficial microbial community
Identifiants
pubmed: 34926538
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.650211
pmc: PMC8679862
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
650211Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Uerlings, Arévalo Sureda, Schroyen, Kroeske, Tanghe, De Vos, Bruggeman, Wavreille, Bindelle, Purcaro and Everaert.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
ST, MD, and GB were employed by company Royal Agrifirm Group. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors EA.
Références
J Anim Sci. 2013 Mar;91(3):1094-101
pubmed: 23230104
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017 Aug;61(8):
pubmed: 28218451
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2016 Apr 1;296:1-9
pubmed: 26879219
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Oct;99(13):5720-5733
pubmed: 31152455
Br J Nutr. 2014 Jun;111 Suppl 1:S30-5
pubmed: 24382146
J Anim Sci. 2017 Jan;95(1):257-269
pubmed: 28177347
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013 Apr;97(2):207-37
pubmed: 22416941
J Nutr. 2004 Sep;134(9):2256-62
pubmed: 15333713
Anim Nutr. 2017 Dec;3(4):313-321
pubmed: 29767141
AMB Express. 2018 Jun 16;8(1):98
pubmed: 29909506
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 7;7(1):7426
pubmed: 28784986
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013 Apr 30;4(1):19
pubmed: 23631414
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007 Jan;292(1):G173-81
pubmed: 16901995
Arch Anim Nutr. 2018 Dec;72(6):425-442
pubmed: 30160174
Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245-50
pubmed: 15289330
Gut Microbes. 2020 Sep 2;11(5):1203-1219
pubmed: 32401136
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2010 Oct-Dec;114(4):1209-14
pubmed: 21500482
J Nutr. 2007 Mar;137(3 Suppl 2):830S-7S
pubmed: 17311983
Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;8(7):1191-9
pubmed: 16817927
Br J Nutr. 2020 Feb 14;123(3):293-307
pubmed: 31699173
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Jan;1850(1):236-52
pubmed: 24821013
J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93(3):505-11
pubmed: 12174051
J Anim Sci. 2006 Jun;84(6):1375-86
pubmed: 16699094
J Nutr. 2004 Mar;134(3):641-7
pubmed: 14988461
Proc Nutr Soc. 2005 Nov;64(4):451-7
pubmed: 16313686
Br J Nutr. 2010 Sep;104(5):637-46
pubmed: 20338074
Braz J Microbiol. 2013 May 07;44(1):1-14
pubmed: 24159277
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jan;78(2):420-8
pubmed: 22101049
Front Immunol. 2021 May 20;12:645168
pubmed: 34093534
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017 Jan;61(1):
pubmed: 27198846
Nutr Res Rev. 2004 Dec;17(2):259-75
pubmed: 19079930
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45
pubmed: 11328886
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017 Nov 1;93(11):
pubmed: 29029078
J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Nov 15;12(11):1359-1374
pubmed: 30010734
Front Immunol. 2019 Dec 09;10:2705
pubmed: 31921096
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 14;8(1):1494
pubmed: 29133785
Front Immunol. 2020 Jun 09;11:1153
pubmed: 32582216
Arch Anim Nutr. 2004 Oct;58(5):353-66
pubmed: 15595619
Arch Anim Nutr. 2004 Apr;58(2):149-56
pubmed: 15195908
Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2769
pubmed: 30524396
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 8;11(1):7746
pubmed: 33833350
J Anim Sci. 2008 Apr;86(4):871-81
pubmed: 18192555
Clin Chem. 1979 Aug;25(8):1440-3
pubmed: 455682
Animal. 2013 Jul;7(7):1067-78
pubmed: 23410993