Influence of X-rays and gamma-rays on the mechanical performance of human bone factoring out intraindividual bone structure and composition indices.
Biomechanics
Bone
Fracture mechanics
Irradiation
Mechanical properties
Journal
Materials today. Bio
ISSN: 2590-0064
Titre abrégé: Mater Today Bio
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101757228
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
30
07
2021
revised:
23
11
2021
accepted:
25
11
2021
entrez:
20
12
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
21
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Doses of irradiation above 25 kGy are known to cause irreversible mechanical decay in bone tissue. However, the impact of irradiation doses absorbed in a clinical setting on the mechanical properties of bone remains unclear. In daily clinical practice and research, patients and specimens are exposed to irradiation due to diagnostic imaging tools, with doses ranging from milligray to Gray. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of irradiation at these doses ranges on the mechanical performance of bone independent of inter-individual bone quality indices. Therefore, cortical bone specimens (n = 10 per group) from a selected organ donor were irradiated at doses of milligray, Gray and kilogray (graft tissue sterilization) at five different irradiation doses. Three-point bending was performed to assess mechanical properties in the study groups. Our results show a severe reduction in mechanical performance (work to fracture: 50.29 ± 11.49 Nmm in control, 14.73 ± 1.84 Nmm at 31.2 kGy p ≤ 0.05) at high irradiation doses of 31.2 kGy, which correspond to graft tissue sterilization or synchrotron imaging. In contrast, no reduction in mechanical properties were detected for doses below 30 Gy. These findings are further supported by fracture surface texture imaging (i.e. more brittle fracture textures above 31.2 kGy). Our findings show that high radiation doses (≥31.2 kGy) severely alter the mechanical properties of bone. Thus, irradiation of this order of magnitude should be taken into account when mechanical analyses are planned after irradiation. However, doses of 30 Gy and below, which are common for clinical and experimental imaging (e.g., radiation therapy, DVT imaging, CT imaging, HR-pQCT imaging, DXA measurements, etc.), do not alter the mechanical bending-behavior of bone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34927043
doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100169
pii: S2590-0064(21)00077-6
pmc: PMC8649390
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100169Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Mar 22;263(1368):287-94
pubmed: 8920251
Oral Oncol. 2005 Aug;41(7):723-8
pubmed: 15979926
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1301-7
pubmed: 7713789
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 02;21(17):
pubmed: 32887421
Small. 2017 Jan;13(3):
pubmed: 28084694
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1596-605
pubmed: 22533576
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 30;108(35):14416-21
pubmed: 21873221
Phys Med Biol. 2011 May 21;56(10):3073-89
pubmed: 21508447
J Biomech. 1969 Oct;2(4):477-80
pubmed: 16335147
Endocr Connect. 2020 Apr;9(4):R70-R80
pubmed: 32168472
Bone. 2007 Apr;40(4):1144-51
pubmed: 17257914
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 21;14(11):e0225127
pubmed: 31751367
J Biomech. 1975;8(6):393-405
pubmed: 1206042
Bonekey Rep. 2012 Sep 19;1:182
pubmed: 24363926
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Dec 19;285(1893):20181820
pubmed: 30963901
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 21;103(47):17741-6
pubmed: 17095608
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Dec;64:53-64
pubmed: 27479894
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Apr;44:147-55
pubmed: 25637825
Cancers (Basel). 2011 Oct 28;3(4):4090-101
pubmed: 24213126
J Orthop Res. 2005 Sep;23(5):1054-8
pubmed: 16140190
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13973-80
pubmed: 25320535
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Dec;88:109-119
pubmed: 30165258
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Aug 29;10:587
pubmed: 31555210
Phys Med Biol. 1994 Jan;39(1):145-64
pubmed: 7651993
Bone. 2010 Jun;46(6):1475-85
pubmed: 20206724
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Jan;7(1):165-76
pubmed: 22071782
Bone. 2011 Jun 1;48(6):1370-7
pubmed: 21453802
J Orthop Res. 2021 Apr;39(4):750-760
pubmed: 32965711
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019 May 02;6(12):1900287
pubmed: 31380168
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 16;6:21072
pubmed: 26879146
Biomaterials. 2009 Oct;30(29):5877-84
pubmed: 19573911
Bone. 2021 Feb;143:115794
pubmed: 33301963
Eur Radiol. 2003 Aug;13(8):1979-91
pubmed: 12687286
Cell Tissue Bank. 2008 Dec;9(4):289-98
pubmed: 18431690
ACS Nano. 2021 Jan 26;15(1):455-467
pubmed: 33404232
Aging Cell. 2010 Dec;9(6):1065-75
pubmed: 20874757
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Dec;11(4):299-304
pubmed: 24057133
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0204928
pubmed: 30281657
J Orthop Res. 1997 Jan;15(1):111-7
pubmed: 9066534
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):418-427
pubmed: 32181730
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Oct;70(10):1269-75
pubmed: 25934995
Cell Tissue Bank. 2017 Sep;18(3):323-334
pubmed: 28560495
Bonekey Rep. 2015 Sep 02;4:743
pubmed: 26380080
Bone. 2014 Apr;61:71-81
pubmed: 24440514
Bone. 2002 Jul;31(1):8-11
pubmed: 12110405
Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 Feb;108(2):219-230
pubmed: 33064170
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2017 Sep 1;17(3):114-139
pubmed: 28860414
Cell Tissue Bank. 2007;8(2):93-105
pubmed: 17063262