A Cross-Sectional Decision-Making Approach to Inform Neuropsychological Battery Development in Professional Hockey.


Journal

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists
ISSN: 1873-5843
Titre abrégé: Arch Clin Neuropsychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9004255

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Feb 2022
Historique:
accepted: 17 11 2021
pubmed: 21 12 2021
medline: 27 4 2022
entrez: 20 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neuropsychologists commonly use a large battery of tests to inform clinical decisions. Decision analysis can be used to determine which individual tests play a role in the decision-making process. The objective of this project was to conduct quantitative and qualitative decision analysis of decisions by team neuropsychologists with professional hockey players being evaluated as part of the National Hockey League (NHL)/NHL Players Association Concussion Protocol. We extracted neuropsychological data from an NHL clinical program database. Team neuropsychologists evaluated concussed players using a hybrid neuropsychological test battery. The neuropsychologists then determined whether players were experiencing concussion-related cognitive difficulties. Logistic regression was used to examine which tests accounted for unique variance in the decision-making process. We also conducted a survey of NHL neuropsychologists, asking them to rate the usefulness of each test in the battery. Five of the fifteen measures accounted for unique variance in team neuropsychologists' decisions, including the ImPACT Verbal Memory Composite, Visual Motor Composite, Reaction Time Composite, Symptom Score, and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Delayed Recall. Notable discrepancies were uncovered between quantitative indications of usefulness and self-reported qualitative perceptions of test usefulness when making decisions. Qualitatively, clinicians reported that the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, ImPACT Reaction Time, and Color Trails 2 were the most useful tests when making decisions. Along with validation studies, decision analysis can be used as part of a comprehensive evaluation process to inform the development of best-practice batteries for use among athletes with sports concussion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34929026
pii: 6470587
doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab092
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

621-632

Subventions

Organisme : Genzyme
Organisme : NFL

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Jared M Bruce (JM)

Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

Willem Meeuwisse (W)

The National Hockey League.

Joan Thelen (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

Michael G Hutchison (MG)

Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON MS55 1A1, Canada.

Paul Comper (P)

Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON MS55 1A1, Canada.
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.

Ruben J Echemendia (RJ)

Psychological and Neurobehavioral Associates, Inc., State College, PA 16801, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH