Success factors in high-effect, low-cost eHealth programs for patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hypertension
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
costs and costs analysis
healthcare costs
self-management
telemedicine
Journal
European journal of preventive cardiology
ISSN: 2047-4881
Titre abrégé: Eur J Prev Cardiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101564430
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 12 2021
20 12 2021
Historique:
received:
08
05
2020
accepted:
10
06
2020
entrez:
20
12
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
eHealth programs can lower blood pressure but also drive healthcare costs. This study aims to review the evidence on the effectiveness and costs of eHealth for hypertension and assess commonalities in programs with high effect and low additional cost. Overall, the incremental decrease in systolic blood pressure using eHealth, compared to usual care, was 3.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.98-4.77) mmHg at 6 months and 5.68 (95% CI 4.77-6.59) mmHg at 12 months' follow-up. High intensity interventions were more effective, resulting in a 2.6 (95% CI 0.5-4.7) (at 6 months) and 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-5.1) (at 12 months) lower systolic blood pressure, but were also more costly, resulting in €170 (95% CI 56-284) higher costs at 6 months and €342 (95% CI 128-556) at 12 months. Programs that included a high volume of participants showed €203 (95% CI 99-307) less costs than those with a low volume at 6 months, and €525 (95% CI 299-751) at 12 months without showing a difference in systolic blood pressure. Studies that implemented eHealth as a partial replacement, rather than addition to usual care, were also less costly (€119 (95% CI -38-201 at 6 months) and €346 (95% CI 261-430 at 12 months)) without being less effective. Evidence on eHealth programs for hypertension is ambiguous, heterogeneity on effectiveness and costs is high (I2 = 56-98%). Effective eHealth with limited additional costs should focus on high intensity interventions, involve a large number of participants and use eHealth as a partial replacement for usual care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
eHealth programs can lower blood pressure but also drive healthcare costs. This study aims to review the evidence on the effectiveness and costs of eHealth for hypertension and assess commonalities in programs with high effect and low additional cost.
RESULTS
Overall, the incremental decrease in systolic blood pressure using eHealth, compared to usual care, was 3.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.98-4.77) mmHg at 6 months and 5.68 (95% CI 4.77-6.59) mmHg at 12 months' follow-up. High intensity interventions were more effective, resulting in a 2.6 (95% CI 0.5-4.7) (at 6 months) and 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-5.1) (at 12 months) lower systolic blood pressure, but were also more costly, resulting in €170 (95% CI 56-284) higher costs at 6 months and €342 (95% CI 128-556) at 12 months. Programs that included a high volume of participants showed €203 (95% CI 99-307) less costs than those with a low volume at 6 months, and €525 (95% CI 299-751) at 12 months without showing a difference in systolic blood pressure. Studies that implemented eHealth as a partial replacement, rather than addition to usual care, were also less costly (€119 (95% CI -38-201 at 6 months) and €346 (95% CI 261-430 at 12 months)) without being less effective. Evidence on eHealth programs for hypertension is ambiguous, heterogeneity on effectiveness and costs is high (I2 = 56-98%).
CONCLUSION
Effective eHealth with limited additional costs should focus on high intensity interventions, involve a large number of participants and use eHealth as a partial replacement for usual care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34929044
pii: 6470904
doi: 10.1177/2047487320957170
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1579-1587Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.