Clinical translation of nanomedicines: Challenges, opportunities, and keys.
COVID-19
Clinical translation
Nanomedicines
Pharmaceutical market
Scalability
Journal
Advanced drug delivery reviews
ISSN: 1872-8294
Titre abrégé: Adv Drug Deliv Rev
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8710523
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
24
08
2021
revised:
12
12
2021
accepted:
13
12
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
19
2
2022
entrez:
20
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the massive interest and recent developments in the field of nanomedicine, only a limited number of formulations have found their way to the clinics. This shortcoming reveals the challenges facing the clinical translation of this technology. In the current article, we summarize and evaluate the status, market situation, and clinical profiles of the reported nanomedicines, the shortcomings limiting their clinical translation, as well as some approaches designed to break through this barrier. Moreover, some emerging technologies that have the potential to compete with nanomedicines are highlighted. Lastly, we identify the key factors that should be considered in nanomedicine-related research to be clinically-translatable. These can be classified into five areas: rational design during the research and development stage, the recruitment of representative preclinical models, careful design of clinical trials, development of specific and uniform regulatory protocols, and calls for non-classic sponsorship. This new field of endeavor was firmly established during the last two decades and more in-depth progress is expected in the coming years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34929251
pii: S0169-409X(21)00476-2
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114083
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
114083Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.