Using the COVID-19 Pandemic to Assess the Influence of News Affect on Online Mental Health-Related Search Behavior Across the United States: Integrated Sentiment Analysis and the Circumplex Model of Affect.
COVID-19
affect
anxiety
behavior
circumplex
coronavirus
depression
generalized mixed models
information seeking
internet
mental health
natural language processing
news
online health information
online search behavior
sentiment
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 01 2022
27 01 2022
Historique:
received:
08
08
2021
accepted:
30
11
2021
revised:
29
11
2021
pubmed:
22
12
2021
medline:
1
2
2022
entrez:
21
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The digital era has ushered in an unprecedented volume of readily accessible information, including news coverage of current events. Research has shown that the sentiment of news articles can evoke emotional responses from readers on a daily basis with specific evidence for increased anxiety and depression in response to coverage of the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Given the primacy and relevance of such information exposure, its daily impact on the mental health of the general population within this modality warrants further nuanced investigation. Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a subject-specific example, this work aimed to profile and examine associations between the dynamics of semantic affect in online local news headlines and same-day online mental health term search behavior over time across the United States. Using COVID-19-related news headlines from a database of online news stories in conjunction with mental health-related online search data from Google Trends, this paper first explored the statistical and qualitative affective properties of state-specific COVID-19 news coverage across the United States from January 23, 2020, to October 22, 2020. The resultant operationalizations and findings from the joint application of dictionary-based sentiment analysis and the circumplex theory of affect informed the construction of subsequent hypothesis-driven mixed effects models. Daily state-specific counts of mental health search queries were regressed on circumplex-derived features of semantic affect, time, and state (as a random effect) to model the associations between the dynamics of news affect and search behavior throughout the pandemic. Search terms were also grouped into depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and nonspecific depression and anxiety symptoms to model the broad impact of news coverage on mental health. Exploratory efforts revealed patterns in day-to-day news headline affect variation across the first 9 months of the pandemic. In addition, circumplex mapping of the most frequently used words in state-specific headlines uncovered time-agnostic similarities and differences across the United States, including the ubiquitous use of negatively valenced and strongly arousing language. Subsequent mixed effects modeling implicated increased consistency in affective tone (Spin This study demonstrated promise in applying the circumplex model of affect to written content and provided a practical example for how circumplex theory can be integrated with sentiment analysis techniques to interrogate mental health-related associations. The findings from pandemic-specific news headlines highlighted arousal, flux, and spin as potentially significant affect-based foci for further study. Future efforts may also benefit from more expansive sentiment analysis approaches to more broadly test the practical application and theoretical capabilities of the circumplex model of affect on text-based data.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The digital era has ushered in an unprecedented volume of readily accessible information, including news coverage of current events. Research has shown that the sentiment of news articles can evoke emotional responses from readers on a daily basis with specific evidence for increased anxiety and depression in response to coverage of the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Given the primacy and relevance of such information exposure, its daily impact on the mental health of the general population within this modality warrants further nuanced investigation.
OBJECTIVE
Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a subject-specific example, this work aimed to profile and examine associations between the dynamics of semantic affect in online local news headlines and same-day online mental health term search behavior over time across the United States.
METHODS
Using COVID-19-related news headlines from a database of online news stories in conjunction with mental health-related online search data from Google Trends, this paper first explored the statistical and qualitative affective properties of state-specific COVID-19 news coverage across the United States from January 23, 2020, to October 22, 2020. The resultant operationalizations and findings from the joint application of dictionary-based sentiment analysis and the circumplex theory of affect informed the construction of subsequent hypothesis-driven mixed effects models. Daily state-specific counts of mental health search queries were regressed on circumplex-derived features of semantic affect, time, and state (as a random effect) to model the associations between the dynamics of news affect and search behavior throughout the pandemic. Search terms were also grouped into depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and nonspecific depression and anxiety symptoms to model the broad impact of news coverage on mental health.
RESULTS
Exploratory efforts revealed patterns in day-to-day news headline affect variation across the first 9 months of the pandemic. In addition, circumplex mapping of the most frequently used words in state-specific headlines uncovered time-agnostic similarities and differences across the United States, including the ubiquitous use of negatively valenced and strongly arousing language. Subsequent mixed effects modeling implicated increased consistency in affective tone (Spin
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated promise in applying the circumplex model of affect to written content and provided a practical example for how circumplex theory can be integrated with sentiment analysis techniques to interrogate mental health-related associations. The findings from pandemic-specific news headlines highlighted arousal, flux, and spin as potentially significant affect-based foci for further study. Future efforts may also benefit from more expansive sentiment analysis approaches to more broadly test the practical application and theoretical capabilities of the circumplex model of affect on text-based data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34932494
pii: v24i1e32731
doi: 10.2196/32731
pmc: PMC8805454
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e32731Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : P30 DA029926
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©Damien Lekkas, Joseph A Gyorda, George D Price, Zoe Wortzman, Nicholas C Jacobson. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 27.01.2022.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1191-207
pubmed: 23404613
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 1;7(6):e19347
pubmed: 32459186
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 27;12(6):e0178806
pubmed: 28654667
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 19;21(11):e13873
pubmed: 31742562
Appl Soft Comput. 2020 Dec;97:106754
pubmed: 33013254
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 May 12;7(5):e19009
pubmed: 32365044
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Aug;116(3):578-88
pubmed: 17696713
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Apr 24;6(4):e12974
pubmed: 31017582
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112954
pubmed: 32325383
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 17;22(6):e20185
pubmed: 32519963
Br J Psychol. 2020 May;111(2):157-173
pubmed: 30900253
J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 15;213:9-15
pubmed: 28171770
Crisis. 2015;36(5):325-31
pubmed: 26502782
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8788-90
pubmed: 24889601
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Summer;17(3):715-34
pubmed: 16262989
Science. 2015 Jun 5;348(6239):1130-2
pubmed: 25953820
Emotion. 2021 Apr;21(3):513-525
pubmed: 32191100
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239696
pubmed: 32997683
Ann Behav Med. 2020 May 25;54(6):402-412
pubmed: 31794010
Emotion. 2011 Aug;11(4):705-31
pubmed: 21707162