Functional connectivity alterations between default mode network and occipital cortex in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).


Journal

NeuroImage. Clinical
ISSN: 2213-1582
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage Clin
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101597070

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 27 08 2021
revised: 06 11 2021
accepted: 12 12 2021
pubmed: 22 12 2021
medline: 4 3 2022
entrez: 21 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Altered brain network connectivity is a potential biomarker for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). A meta-analysis of resting-state MRI studies by Gürsel et al. (2018) described altered functional connectivity in OCD patients within and between the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SN), and the frontoparietal network (FPN), as well as evidence for aberrant fronto-striatal circuitry. Here, we tested the replicability of these meta-analytic rsfMRI findings by measuring functional connectivity during resting-state fMRI in a new sample of OCD patients (n = 24) and matched controls (n = 33). We performed seed-to-voxel analyses using 30 seed regions from the prior meta-analysis. OCD patients showed reduced functional connectivity between the SN and the DMN compared to controls, replicating previous findings. We did not observe significant group differences of functional connectivity within the DMN, SN, nor FPN. Additionally, we observed reduced connectivity between the visual network to both the DMN and SN in OCD patients, in particular reduced functional connectivity between lateral parietal seeds and the left inferior lateral occipital pole. Furthermore, the right lateral parietal seed (associated with the DMN) was more strongly correlated with a cluster in the right lateral occipital cortex and precuneus (a region partly overlapping with the Dorsal Attentional Network (DAN)) in patients. Importantly, this latter finding was positively correlated to OCD symptom severity. Overall, our study partly replicated prior meta-analytic findings, highlighting hypoconnectivity between SN and DMN as a potential biomarker for OCD. Furthermore, we identified changes between the SN and the DMN with the visual network. This suggests that abnormal connectivity between cortex regions associated with abstract functions (transmodal regions such as the DMN), and cortex regions associated with constrained neural processing (unimodal regions such as the visual cortex), may be important in OCD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34933233
pii: S2213-1582(21)00359-4
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102915
pmc: PMC8688720
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102915

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;165(10):1308-15
pubmed: 18519525
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36356
pubmed: 22570705
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 08;6:1535
pubmed: 26500590
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014 Sep;39(5):304-11
pubmed: 24866415
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jan;75(1):14-22
pubmed: 33009849
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Apr;87:151-160
pubmed: 29410103
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 5;7(9):e1230
pubmed: 28872637
Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;20(3):345-52
pubmed: 24840709
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:83-94
pubmed: 32006553
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Dec 10;13:246-255
pubmed: 28018851
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
pubmed: 13688369
Neuron. 2010 Feb 25;65(4):550-62
pubmed: 20188659
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 05;10(11):e0142014
pubmed: 26540239
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(3):525-49
pubmed: 18061263
Health Inf Manag. 1997 Mar-May;27(1):31-8
pubmed: 10169442
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;74(7):685-90
pubmed: 23945445
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Sep 30;3:33
pubmed: 19826498
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Feb;376(1817):20190691
pubmed: 33308072
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):483-506
pubmed: 21908230
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jun;35(6):2852-60
pubmed: 24123377
Psychol Med. 2020 May;50(7):1173-1181
pubmed: 31120006
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1006-11
pubmed: 2684084
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 10;10:319
pubmed: 31133898
Psychol Assess. 2002 Dec;14(4):485-96
pubmed: 12501574
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016 Mar;18(1):7-21
pubmed: 27069376
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul;104(1):322-35
pubmed: 20463201
Brain Imaging Behav. 2015 Jun;9(2):255-63
pubmed: 24760279
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 29;7(8):e1224
pubmed: 28850108
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Nov;8(6):566-87
pubmed: 23961985
Commun Biol. 2019 Apr 12;2:130
pubmed: 30993214
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017 Jul 30;265:87-97
pubmed: 28024845
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102460
pubmed: 33395956
Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125-41
pubmed: 22642651
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003 Apr;107(4):291-7
pubmed: 12662252
Psychiatry Res. 2003 Jan 20;122(1):37-47
pubmed: 12589881
Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 1;221:117164
pubmed: 32679253
Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;136(2):208-210
pubmed: 20192560
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jun;20(43):1-392
pubmed: 27306503
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Jun;15(6):410-24
pubmed: 24840803
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;62(7):782-90
pubmed: 15997020
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;46:25-32
pubmed: 28992533
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 27;115(9):2222-2227
pubmed: 29440404
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Aug 30;163(3):236-47
pubmed: 18667293
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Apr;6(4):399-409
pubmed: 33495121
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;205(5):376-82
pubmed: 25257066
Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Apr 06;4:8
pubmed: 20407579
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 1;25(2):616-24
pubmed: 15784441
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20619
pubmed: 33244182
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;72(8):743-4
pubmed: 26061674
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2008 Sep;33(5):405-12
pubmed: 18787662
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 13;7:44468
pubmed: 28287615
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2000 Sep;23(3):563-86
pubmed: 10986728
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1125-65
pubmed: 21653723
Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 1;221:117126
pubmed: 32673748
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117072
pubmed: 32585346
Cortex. 2015 Jan;62:89-108
pubmed: 23582297
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jan;38(1):109-119
pubmed: 27548880
Brain Res Bull. 2010 Apr 5;81(6):565-73
pubmed: 20003916

Auteurs

Tal Geffen (T)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: tal.geffen@charite.de.

Jonathan Smallwood (J)

Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Carsten Finke (C)

Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany.

Sebastian Olbrich (S)

Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Zsuzsika Sjoerds (Z)

Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain & Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.

Florian Schlagenhauf (F)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH