The rupture of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm does not associate with an asymmetry in the A1 or A2 arteries: a retrospective study of radiological features.

AcoA aneurysm aneurysm formation anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture parent vessel asymmetry

Journal

British journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1360-046X
Titre abrégé: Br J Neurosurg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8800054

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Dec 2021
Historique:
entrez: 22 12 2021
pubmed: 23 12 2021
medline: 23 12 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Although the formation and rupture risk of an anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysm has been the subject of many studies, no previous study has primarily searched for the relationship of the parent and daughter vessels and the impact of their size/diameter ratio on the potential rupture risk of an AcoA aneurysm. The objective of this study is to explore this link and to further analyse the surrounding vasculature of the anterior communicating artery aneurysm. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 434 patients: 284 patients with an ACoA aneurysm (121 unruptured and 162 ruptured) and 150 control patients without an ΑCoA aneurysm. Radiological angiography investigations were used to assess the diameter ratios of the parent vessels in addition to ACoA aneurysm morphology parameters. When comparing the ruptured to the unruptured cases, we observed no significant difference in the parent or daughter vessel diameter ratios. Younger patient age (OR 0.96, In our study, we focused on asymmetry in the parent and daughter vessels as well as traditional ACoA aneurysm morphological characteristics. We were able to label younger patient age and a greater size ratio as independent prognostic factors for ACoA aneurysm rupture. We were unable to label parent and daughter vessel asymmetry as prognostic factors. To validate our findings, parent and daughter vessel asymmetry should be subjected to future prospective studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Although the formation and rupture risk of an anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysm has been the subject of many studies, no previous study has primarily searched for the relationship of the parent and daughter vessels and the impact of their size/diameter ratio on the potential rupture risk of an AcoA aneurysm. The objective of this study is to explore this link and to further analyse the surrounding vasculature of the anterior communicating artery aneurysm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 434 patients: 284 patients with an ACoA aneurysm (121 unruptured and 162 ruptured) and 150 control patients without an ΑCoA aneurysm. Radiological angiography investigations were used to assess the diameter ratios of the parent vessels in addition to ACoA aneurysm morphology parameters.
RESULTS RESULTS
When comparing the ruptured to the unruptured cases, we observed no significant difference in the parent or daughter vessel diameter ratios. Younger patient age (OR 0.96,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In our study, we focused on asymmetry in the parent and daughter vessels as well as traditional ACoA aneurysm morphological characteristics. We were able to label younger patient age and a greater size ratio as independent prognostic factors for ACoA aneurysm rupture. We were unable to label parent and daughter vessel asymmetry as prognostic factors. To validate our findings, parent and daughter vessel asymmetry should be subjected to future prospective studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34933612
doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021.2016624
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-6

Auteurs

Andreas Wetzel-Yalelis (A)

Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Cihat Karadag (C)

Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Lan Li (L)

Department of Neurosurgery, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany.

Bernd Turowski (B)

Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Richard Bostelmann (R)

Department of Neurosurgery, Christliches Krankenhaus Quakenbrück gemeinnützige GmbH, Quakenbrück, Germany.

Yousef Abusabha (Y)

Medical Faculty, Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Björn B Hofmann (BB)

Medical Faculty, Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Konstantinos Gousias (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, St. Marien Hospital, Luenen, Germany.

Rachit Agrawal (R)

Department of Neurosurgery, St. Marien Hospital, Luenen, Germany.

Matthias König (M)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, St. Marien Hospital, Luenen, Germany.

Marga Kaiser (M)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, St. Marien Hospital, Luenen, Germany.

Hendrik-Jan Mijderwijk (HJ)

Medical Faculty, Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Athanasios K Petridis (AK)

Medical Faculty, Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Classifications MeSH