The incidence of discordant clinical and genomic risk in patients with invasive lobular or ductal carcinoma of the breast: a National Cancer Database Study.
Journal
NPJ breast cancer
ISSN: 2374-4677
Titre abrégé: NPJ Breast Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674891
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Dec 2021
21 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
13
07
2021
accepted:
06
12
2021
entrez:
22
12
2021
pubmed:
23
12
2021
medline:
23
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When molecular testing classifies breast tumors as low risk but clinical risk is high, the optimal management strategy is unknown. One group of patients who may be more likely to have such discordant risk are those with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. We sought to examine whether patients with invasive lobular carcinoma are more likely to have clinical high/genomic low-risk tumors compared to those with invasive ductal carcinoma, and to evaluate the impact on receipt of chemotherapy and overall survival. We conducted a cohort study using the National Cancer Database from 2010-2016. Patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, stage I-III breast cancer who underwent 70-gene signature testing were included. We evaluated the proportion of patients with discordant clinical and genomic risk by histology using Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models with and without propensity score matching. A total of 7399 patients (1497 with invasive lobular carcinoma [20.2%]) were identified. Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma were significantly more likely to fall into a discordant risk category compared to those with invasive ductal carcinoma (46.8% versus 37.1%, p < 0.001), especially in the clinical high/genomic low risk subgroup (35.6% versus 19.2%, p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis of the clinical high/genomic low-risk cohort who received chemotherapy, invasive ductal carcinoma patients had significantly improved overall survival compared to those with invasive lobular carcinoma (p = 0.02). These findings suggest that current tools for stratifying clinical and genomic risk could be improved for those with invasive lobular carcinoma to better tailor treatment selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34934058
doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00366-x
pii: 10.1038/s41523-021-00366-x
pmc: PMC8692497
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
156Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K08 CA256047
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : TL1 TR001871
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Semin Oncol. 2019 Apr;46(2):121-132
pubmed: 31239068
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):35-43
pubmed: 22961065
Biomark Insights. 2016 Dec 11;11:139-146
pubmed: 27980389
Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6
pubmed: 11823860
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2336-2347
pubmed: 34914339
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 10;24(23):3726-34
pubmed: 16720680
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29
pubmed: 27557300
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;27(12):4711-4719
pubmed: 32725525
Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;123(16):3015-3021
pubmed: 28382636
Rofo. 1990 Apr;152(4):460-2
pubmed: 2160109
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1722-1728
pubmed: 28241198
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018 Jan;27(1):81-94
pubmed: 29132567
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 11;17:94
pubmed: 26163296
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 May;17(5):1406-13
pubmed: 20094918
Ann Surg. 2005 Aug;242(2):281-9
pubmed: 16041220
BMC Cancer. 2016 Mar 25;16:248
pubmed: 27015895
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;120(2):132-141
pubmed: 31062375
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89778
pubmed: 24587029
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jan;119(2):415-22
pubmed: 19885731
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4177-81
pubmed: 19636004
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:18-21
pubmed: 27249682
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):81
pubmed: 32005181
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 1;12(9):e0182397
pubmed: 28863134
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 13;16:459
pubmed: 27411945
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009
pubmed: 12490681