A novel orally active gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, relugolix, is a potential substitute for injectable GnRH antagonists in controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology.
Gonadotropin‐releasing hormone antagonist
cetrorelix
controlled ovarian stimulation
pregnancy rate
relugolix
Journal
Reproductive medicine and biology
ISSN: 1445-5781
Titre abrégé: Reprod Med Biol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101213278
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
29
08
2021
revised:
17
10
2021
accepted:
25
10
2021
entrez:
23
12
2021
pubmed:
24
12
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the efficacy of an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH Ant), relugolix (R), for assisted reproductive technology (ART). We enrolled women undergoing ART using a GnRH Ant for controlled ovarian stimulation. We compared R; 20 mg/day with cetrorelix acetate (C); 0.125 mg. C was administered to 88 women in 2019, and R to 93 women in 2020. Clinical outcomes associated with ART were assessed in both groups. The luteinizing hormone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection in the R group (1.26 ± 0.93 IU/L) were significantly lower than those in the C group (2.85 ± 3.02 IU/L). There were no cases in which egg retrieval was canceled in both groups. The total doses of gonadotropins administered were greater in the R group compared with the C group. The number of days of GnRH Ant administration in the R group (1.71 ± 0.57 days) was significantly longer compared with the C group (1.48 ± 0.58 days). The number of oocytes collected, fertilization rates, and pregnancy rates (R; 47.1% vs C; 45.8%) did not differ between the two groups. An orally active GnRH Ant, relugolix, when used in controlled ovarian stimulation for ART, showed comparable clinical outcomes with cetrorelix.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34938148
doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12424
pii: RMB212424
pmc: PMC8658872
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e12424Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All the authors state explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.
Références
Reprod Med Biol. 2021 Nov 12;21(1):e12424
pubmed: 34938148
Fertil Steril. 2001 Feb;75(2):316-23
pubmed: 11172833
Hum Reprod Update. 2002 May-Jun;8(3):279-90
pubmed: 12078838
Cancer Med. 2019 Oct;8(13):5891-5902
pubmed: 31429205
Reprod Med Biol. 2019 Apr 04;18(3):263-272
pubmed: 31312105
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Sep 1;23(5):560-579
pubmed: 28903472
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Dec;100(12):4579-87
pubmed: 26502357
Fertil Steril. 2019 Nov;112(5):922-929.e2
pubmed: 31594635
Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 May;14(5):640-9
pubmed: 17509210
Fertil Steril. 2021 Feb;115(2):397-405
pubmed: 32912633
J Med Chem. 2011 Jul 28;54(14):4998-5012
pubmed: 21657270
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017 Dec;44(4):232-238
pubmed: 29376021
J Med Chem. 1998 Oct 22;41(22):4190-5
pubmed: 9784092
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2187-2196
pubmed: 32469183
Reprod Med Biol. 2013 Jul;12(3):71-77
pubmed: 23874146
Hum Reprod. 1998 Sep;13(9):2392-8
pubmed: 9806255