Mechanistic reconciliation of community and invasion ecology.
community ecology
hypothesis
invasion ecology
model
process
theory
Journal
Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)
ISSN: 2150-8925
Titre abrégé: Ecosphere
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596096
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
27
08
2020
accepted:
30
08
2020
entrez:
23
12
2021
pubmed:
24
12
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Community and invasion ecology have mostly grown independently. There is substantial overlap in the processes captured by different models in the two fields, and various frameworks have been developed to reduce this redundancy and synthesize information content. Despite broad recognition that community and invasion ecology are interconnected, a process-based framework synthesizing models across these two fields is lacking. Here we review 65 representative community and invasion models and propose a common framework articulated around six processes (dispersal, drift, abiotic interactions, within-guild interactions, cross-guild interactions, and genetic changes). The framework is designed to synthesize the content of the two fields, provide a general perspective on their development, and enable their comparison. The application of this framework and of a novel method based on network theory reveals some lack of coherence between the two fields, despite some historical similarities. Community ecology models are characterized by combinations of multiple processes, likely reflecting the search for an overarching theory to explain community assembly and structure, drawing predominantly on interaction processes, but also accounting largely for the other processes. In contrast, most models in invasion ecology invoke fewer processes and focus more on interactions between introduced species and their novel biotic and abiotic environment. The historical dominance of interaction processes and their independent developments in the two fields is also reflected in the lower level of coherence for models involving interactions, compared to models involving dispersal, drift, and genetic changes. It appears that community ecology, with a longer history than invasion ecology, has transitioned from the search for single explanations for patterns observed in nature to investigate how processes may interact mechanistically, thereby generating and testing hypotheses. Our framework paves the way for a similar transition in invasion ecology, to better capture the dynamics of multiple alien species introduced in complex communities. Reciprocally, applying insights from invasion to community ecology will help us understand and predict the future of ecological communities in the Anthropocene, in which human activities are weakening species' natural boundaries. Ultimately, the successful integration of the two fields could advance a predictive ecology that is urgently required in a rapidly changing world.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34938590
doi: 10.1002/ecs2.3359
pii: ECS23359
pmc: PMC8647914
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e03359Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Références
Ecol Lett. 2019 Jan;22(1):19-33
pubmed: 30370702
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Sep;34(9):831-843
pubmed: 31155422
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 May;33(5):313-325
pubmed: 29605085
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 27;101(30):10854-61
pubmed: 15243158
Ecol Lett. 2018 Nov;21(11):1737-1751
pubmed: 30182500
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Jan;32(1):13-22
pubmed: 27889080
Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10
pubmed: 17840770
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9270-9275
pubmed: 30158167
Ecol Lett. 2011 Apr;14(4):407-18
pubmed: 21513009
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):887-95
pubmed: 16796578
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 21;114(47):12507-12511
pubmed: 29109261
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Jul;29(7):384-9
pubmed: 24863182
Nature. 2002 Jun 6;417(6889):608-9
pubmed: 12050652
Science. 1968 Mar 29;159(3822):1432-7
pubmed: 5732485
Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):981-93
pubmed: 16913942
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Apr;27(4):198-202
pubmed: 22401902
Ecol Lett. 2006 Apr;9(4):399-409
pubmed: 16623725
Mol Ecol. 2013 Dec;22(23):5793-804
pubmed: 24192018
Nature. 2004 Feb 19;427(6976):731-3
pubmed: 14973484
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Apr;27(4):203-8
pubmed: 22341498
Nature. 2001 Oct 11;413(6856):635-9
pubmed: 11675787
Ecol Lett. 2015 May;18(5):472-82
pubmed: 25818618
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 22;282(1821):20152417
pubmed: 26702047
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):65-93
pubmed: 10740893
Ecol Lett. 2007 Jan;10(1):77-94
pubmed: 17204119
Ecology. 2019 Feb;100(2):e02576
pubmed: 30516271
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 May;20(5):223-8
pubmed: 16701373
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Sep;22(9):465-71
pubmed: 17640765
Ecol Lett. 2008 Aug;11(8):852-66
pubmed: 18422638
Theor Popul Biol. 1970 May;1(1):1-11
pubmed: 5527624
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):136-44
pubmed: 19178981
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jun;9(6):726-40
pubmed: 16706916
New Phytol. 2013 Nov;200(3):615-633
pubmed: 23879193
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 May;34(5):386-387
pubmed: 30851989
Ambio. 2017 May;46(4):428-442
pubmed: 28150137
Theor Popul Biol. 2000 Nov;58(3):211-37
pubmed: 11120650
Ecology. 2010 Apr;91(4):1152-62
pubmed: 20462129
New Phytol. 2007;176(2):256-273
pubmed: 17822399
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb;34(2):121-131
pubmed: 30514581
Science. 2010 Apr 30;328(5978):575-6
pubmed: 20431001
Ecol Lett. 2020 Sep;23(9):1314-1329
pubmed: 32672410
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jun;68(6):1246-8
pubmed: 16591932