Variation in Plant-Pollinator Network Structure along the Elevational Gradient of the San Francisco Peaks, Arizona.
bees
butterflies
elevational gradient
flies
plant–pollinator interactions
pollination networks
pollinators
Journal
Insects
ISSN: 2075-4450
Titre abrégé: Insects
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101574235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Nov 2021
26 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
07
10
2021
revised:
18
11
2021
accepted:
24
11
2021
entrez:
23
12
2021
pubmed:
24
12
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The structural patterns comprising bimodal pollination networks can help characterize plant-pollinator systems and the interactions that influence species distribution and diversity over time and space. We compare network organization of three plant-pollinator communities along the altitudinal gradient of the San Francisco Peaks in northern Arizona. We found that pollination networks become more nested, as well as exhibit lower overall network specialization, with increasing elevation. Greater weight of generalist pollinators at higher elevations of the San Francisco Peaks may result in plant-pollinator communities less vulnerable to future species loss due to changing climate or shifts in species distribution. We uncover the critical, more generalized pollinator species likely responsible for higher nestedness and stability at the higher elevation environment. The generalist species most important for network stability may be of the greatest interest for conservation efforts; preservation of the most important links in plant-pollinator networks may help secure the more specialized pollinators and maintain species redundancy in the face of ecological change, such as changing climate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34940148
pii: insects12121060
doi: 10.3390/insects12121060
pmc: PMC8704280
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3226-3235
pubmed: 29652102
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):139-149
pubmed: 28502082
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19891-6
pubmed: 18056808
Nature. 2000 Jun 22;405(6789):907-13
pubmed: 10879524
Mol Ecol. 2019 May;28(10):2610-2624
pubmed: 30843297
Science. 2019 Sep 13;365(6458):1108-1113
pubmed: 31515383
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2605-11
pubmed: 15615687
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 14;7:e7867
pubmed: 31632853
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
pubmed: 17164193
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0254072
pubmed: 34197555
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):345-53
pubmed: 20188434
Ecol Lett. 2017 Oct;20(10):1261-1272
pubmed: 28921857
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Apr;15(4):140-143
pubmed: 10717682
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 16;8(1):4706
pubmed: 29549294
Ecol Lett. 2009 Feb;12(2):184-95
pubmed: 19049509
J Theor Biol. 2007 Nov 21;249(2):307-13
pubmed: 17897679
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Nov;21(11):4086-97
pubmed: 26332102
Biodivers Data J. 2020 Apr 02;8:e49285
pubmed: 32292276
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4711
pubmed: 30886227
Sci Rep. 2019 May 14;9(1):7376
pubmed: 31089144
Biol Lett. 2008 Oct 23;4(5):568-72
pubmed: 18664421
BMC Ecol. 2006 Aug 14;6:9
pubmed: 16907983
PeerJ. 2018 Dec 3;6:e6025
pubmed: 30533311
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 29;13(11):e0207453
pubmed: 30496213
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 12;14(6):e0217198
pubmed: 31188862
J Anim Ecol. 2014 May;83(3):639-50
pubmed: 24219131
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9383-7
pubmed: 12881488
Plants (Basel). 2021 Feb 13;10(2):
pubmed: 33668533
PeerJ. 2021 Aug 27;9:e12021
pubmed: 34532158
Ecology. 2021 Nov 23;:e03598
pubmed: 34813669
Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):710-7
pubmed: 17594426
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):3052-3064
pubmed: 32061109
Am Nat. 2014 May;183(5):600-11
pubmed: 24739193