How Housing Conditions Determine the Welfare of Pigs.
health
herd management
housing conditions
pigs
welfare
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Dec 2021
07 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
11
10
2021
revised:
02
12
2021
accepted:
03
12
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
25
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Humans who care for pigs prefer an environment that not only allows the pigs to express their natural behaviors but also limits the development of aggression and stereotypes. Most of the behavioral and health problems encountered by pigs in barren, conventional conditions are solved by alternative housing systems. However, it is not known whether these systems are advantageous in terms of the performance of pigs. In this work, we review the effects of housing systems on pigs' behaviors and performance, which are among the major indicators of the welfare of these animals. Research results point out that outdoor systems are more ideal for sows and fatteners than buildings. Nonetheless, outdoor housing is associated with two major effects in both groups: increased activity due to environmental exploration and higher space allowance, and increased incidence of injuries compared to indoor systems. Sows are more active when housed in groups, but they experience an increased frequency of injuries. According to the literature, group-housed sows give birth to healthy piglets with good daily weight gains. The difference in the fattening and slaughter performance of pigs raised indoors vs. outdoors remains unclear, and the results reported so far are inconsistent. Outdoor systems seem to be associated with a higher incidence of osteochondrosis and lesions of elbow and hock joints, whereas indoor systems cause a greater degree of body soiling in pigs. Based on the reviewed literature, it may be concluded that outdoor housing helps to solve behavioral issues in pigs but leads to other problems in pig production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34944259
pii: ani11123484
doi: 10.3390/ani11123484
pmc: PMC8697881
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Nov 1;117(1):189-99
pubmed: 25175675
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 21;9(5):
pubmed: 31117191
Nature. 1974 Apr 26;248(5451):740-3
pubmed: 4365049
Ambio. 2005 Jun;34(4-5):325-30
pubmed: 16092264
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017 Sep;30(9):1207-1214
pubmed: 28728401
Meat Sci. 2002 Nov;62(3):353-8
pubmed: 22061611
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016 Mar;29(3):428-35
pubmed: 26950876
Meat Sci. 2015 Nov;109:13-7
pubmed: 26013042
Horm Behav. 2007 Jun;52(1):78-85
pubmed: 17482189
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 26;10(10):
pubmed: 32993171
Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):656-67
pubmed: 22436283
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2008;11(1):1-13
pubmed: 18444023
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016 Sep 27;23(4):581-586
pubmed: 28030927
Animal. 2021 Mar;15(3):100154
pubmed: 33573976
J Anim Sci. 2008 Apr;86(4):982-91
pubmed: 17965323
Vet J. 2006 Mar;171(2):367-9
pubmed: 15951210
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jun 04;7:268
pubmed: 32582773
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006 Feb;46(2):62-7; discussion 67-8
pubmed: 16498214
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jun 22;9(6):
pubmed: 31234475
J Anim Sci. 2003 Jul;81(7):1663-70
pubmed: 12854801
J Anim Sci. 2001 Oct;79(10):2571-9
pubmed: 11721836
Animal. 2008 Mar;2(3):459-70
pubmed: 22445049
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;25(10):1351-6
pubmed: 25049489
Vet Rec. 2005 Jul 16;157(3):71-80
pubmed: 16024672
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 15;14(2):e0212417
pubmed: 30768620
Animal. 2018 Apr;12(4):810-818
pubmed: 28877778
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016 Jan;29(1):142-8
pubmed: 26732338
Physiol Behav. 2007 Oct 22;92(3):429-33
pubmed: 17182067
Animal. 2014 Sep;8(9):1479-97
pubmed: 25130712
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Sep 11;10:208
pubmed: 25208481
EFSA J. 2021 Jun 09;19(6):e06639
pubmed: 34140998
Porcine Health Manag. 2015 Apr 16;1:2
pubmed: 28405411
Animals (Basel). 2017 Apr 29;7(5):
pubmed: 28468261
Animal. 2011 Feb;5(4):580-600
pubmed: 22439955