Can Any Drug Be Repurposed for Cancer Treatment? A Systematic Assessment of the Scientific Literature.
cancer
meta research
repositioning
repurposing
systematic assessment
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Dec 2021
13 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
25
10
2021
revised:
08
12
2021
accepted:
08
12
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
25
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Drug repurposing is a complementary pathway for introducing new drugs against cancer. Broad systematic assessments of ongoing repurposing efforts in oncology are lacking, but may be helpful to critically appraise current and future efforts. Hence, we conducted a systematic PubMed search encompassing 100 frequently prescribed and 100 randomly selected drugs, and assessed the published preclinical anti-cancer effects. Furthermore, we evaluated all the identified original articles for methodological quality. We found reports indicating anti-cancer effects for 138/200 drugs, especially among frequently prescribed drugs (81/100). Most were reports suggesting single-agent activity of the drugs (61%). Basic information, such as the cell line used or control treatments utilized, were reported consistently, while more detailed information (e.g., excluded data) was mostly missing. The majority (56%) of in vivo studies reported randomizing animals, while only few articles stated that the experiments were conducted in a blinded fashion. In conclusion, we found promising reports of anti-cancer effects for the majority of the assessed drugs, but speculate that many of them are false-positive findings. Reward systems should be adjusted to encourage the widespread usage of high reporting quality and bias-reducing methodologies, aiming to decrease the rate of false-positive results, and thereby increasing the trust in the findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34944859
pii: cancers13246236
doi: 10.3390/cancers13246236
pmc: PMC8699650
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Aug;3(8):673-83
pubmed: 15286734
Circ Res. 2015 Jan 2;116(1):116-26
pubmed: 25552691
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76
pubmed: 23571845
Nature. 2016 Jun 14;534(7607):314-6
pubmed: 27306171
PLoS Biol. 2020 Mar 26;18(3):e3000690
pubmed: 32214315
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Jan;18(1):1-2
pubmed: 29880920
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;103(2):253-261
pubmed: 29052220
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Mar 18;90(6):455-60
pubmed: 9521170
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;32(1):40-51
pubmed: 24406927
PLoS Biol. 2013 Jul;11(7):e1001609
pubmed: 23874156
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;140(12):1225-36
pubmed: 25068501
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr;14(4):193-194
pubmed: 28266519
Ann Neurol. 2020 Jan;87(1):40-51
pubmed: 31714631
Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Apr 10;30(4):317-20
pubmed: 22491277
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 4:iv1-iv62
pubmed: 26511214
PLoS Biol. 2015 Jul 08;13(7):e1002190
pubmed: 26154287
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124
pubmed: 16060722
PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 5;16(4):e2004879
pubmed: 29621228
BMJ. 2020 Jun 25;369:m2081
pubmed: 32586791
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Jan;18(1):41-58
pubmed: 30310233
Int J Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;143(8):1840-1848
pubmed: 29516505
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33
pubmed: 33433946
BMJ. 2010 Mar 12;340:b5087
pubmed: 20228141
J Cell Physiol. 2019 May;234(5):5683-5699
pubmed: 30341914
PLoS Biol. 2015 Oct 13;13(10):e1002273
pubmed: 26460723
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1046-58
pubmed: 26279400
Blood. 2008 Apr 15;111(8):3968-77
pubmed: 18245666
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 26;14(11):e0223758
pubmed: 31770377