Portal Vein Pulsatility as a Dynamic Marker of Venous Congestion Following Cardiac Surgery: An Interventional Study Using Positive End-Expiratory Pressure.
cardiac surgery
echography
mechanical ventilation
portal vein pulsatility
venous congestion
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Dec 2021
12 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
16
11
2021
revised:
07
12
2021
accepted:
10
12
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
25
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to assess variations in the portal vein pulsatility index (PI) during mechanical ventilation following cardiac surgery. After ethical approval, we conducted a prospective monocentric study at Amiens University Hospital. Patients under mechanical ventilation following cardiac surgery were enrolled. Doppler evaluation of the portal vein (PV) was performed by transthoracic echography. The maximum velocity (VMAX) and minimum velocity (VMIN) of the PV were measured in pulsed Doppler mode. The PI was calculated using the following formula (VMAX - VMIN)/(VMax). A positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) incremental trial was performed from 0 to 15 cmH In total, 144 patients were screened from February 2018 to March 2019 and 29 were enrolled. Central venous pressure significantly increased for each PEEP increment. Stroke volumes were significantly lower after PEEP incrementation, with 52 mL (50-55) at PEEP 0 cmH In the present study, PI appears to be a dynamic marker of the interaction between mechanical ventilation and right heart pressure after cardiac surgery. The PI could be a useful noninvasive tool to monitor venous congestion associated with mechanical ventilation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34945106
pii: jcm10245810
doi: 10.3390/jcm10245810
pmc: PMC8706622
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Mar;116(3):350-6
pubmed: 26577035
Crit Care. 2016 Mar 24;20:74
pubmed: 27013056
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7
pubmed: 17938396
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1774-81
pubmed: 23774337
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1949-1964
pubmed: 31777389
Crit Care. 2013 Nov 29;17(6):R278
pubmed: 24289206
Crit Care. 2020 Oct 19;24(1):615
pubmed: 33076961
J Crit Care. 2022 Feb;67:72-78
pubmed: 34689064
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Aug;32(8):535-42
pubmed: 25192267
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Oct;13(5):528-31
pubmed: 17762231
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Sep;6(18):349
pubmed: 30370276
Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;43(5):643-651
pubmed: 28120005
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 31;8:715099
pubmed: 34532330
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Feb;122(2):206-214
pubmed: 30686306
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):397-9
pubmed: 27543537
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Sep;35(9):1134-1141
pubmed: 31395469
Ultrasound J. 2020 Apr 9;12(1):16
pubmed: 32270297
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Aug;32(4):1780-1787
pubmed: 29277304
Crit Care. 2020 Mar 5;24(1):80
pubmed: 32138764
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Aug 9;7(1):83
pubmed: 28795349
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(9):e2655
pubmed: 26945353
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):602-8
pubmed: 26787777
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010 Feb;6(2):107-15
pubmed: 20027192
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 17;53(7):589-596
pubmed: 19215833
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Oct 2;7(19):e009961
pubmed: 30371304
Crit Care. 2013 May 27;17(3):R98
pubmed: 23710662
Anesth Analg. 2017 Apr;124(4):1109-1115
pubmed: 28151822
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb 7;12(5):768-71
pubmed: 16521192