Measuring the Compressibility of Cellulose Nanofiber-Stabilized Microdroplets Using Acoustophoresis.
acoustic contrast factor
acoustofluidics
compressibility
droplet vaporization
radiation force
ultrasound contrast agent
ultrasound-mediated drug delivery
Journal
Micromachines
ISSN: 2072-666X
Titre abrégé: Micromachines (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101640903
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Nov 2021
27 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
04
11
2021
revised:
24
11
2021
accepted:
25
11
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
25
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Droplets with a liquid perfluoropentane core and a cellulose nanofiber shell have the potential to be used as drug carriers in ultrasound-mediated drug delivery. However, it is necessary to understand their mechanical properties to develop ultrasound imaging sequences that enable in vivo imaging of the vaporization process to ensure optimized drug delivery. In this work, the compressibility of droplets stabilized with cellulose nanofibers was estimated using acoustophoresis at three different acoustic pressures. Polyamide particles of known size and material properties were used for calibration. The droplet compressibility was then used to estimate the cellulose nanofiber bulk modulus and compare it to experimentally determined values. The results showed that the acoustic contrast factor for these droplets was negative, as the droplets relocated to pressure antinodes during ultrasonic actuation. The droplet compressibility was 6.6-6.8 ×10-10 Pa-1, which is higher than for water (4.4×10-10 Pa-1) but lower than for pure perfluoropentane (2.7×10-9 Pa-1). The compressibility was constant across different droplet diameters, which was consistent with the idea that the shell thickness depends on the droplet size, rather than being constant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34945315
pii: mi12121465
doi: 10.3390/mi12121465
pmc: PMC8707857
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Methods. 2017 Feb 15;115:80-90
pubmed: 27713081
Lab Chip. 2020 Jun 7;20(11):1981-1990
pubmed: 32356853
Int J Pharm. 2017 Nov 25;533(1):285-297
pubmed: 28951349
Lab Chip. 2012 Nov 21;12(22):4617-27
pubmed: 23010952
Lab Chip. 2012 Jul 7;12(13):2337-44
pubmed: 22522812
J Control Release. 2018 May 28;278:100-109
pubmed: 29630986
Lab Chip. 2018 Dec 4;18(24):3802-3813
pubmed: 30402651
J Control Release. 2016 Dec 28;244(Pt A):74-82
pubmed: 27847327
Langmuir. 2019 Oct 8;35(40):13090-13099
pubmed: 31549511
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Feb;145(2):1105
pubmed: 30823782
Lab Chip. 2015 Aug 21;15(16):3341-9
pubmed: 26156858
Theranostics. 2017 Apr 3;7(6):1477-1488
pubmed: 28529631
Carbohydr Polym. 2021 Dec 1;273:118507
pubmed: 34560938
Lab Chip. 2014 Mar 7;14(5):947-56
pubmed: 24402640
Carbohydr Polym. 2015 Aug 1;126:40-6
pubmed: 25933520
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Dec;112(6):2858-62
pubmed: 12509007
Semin Cancer Biol. 2021 Feb;69:226-237
pubmed: 31704145
Micromachines (Basel). 2018 Nov 14;9(11):
pubmed: 30441752
J Ther Ultrasound. 2015 Nov 11;3:20
pubmed: 26566442
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jul 14;2019:9480193
pubmed: 31392217
Small. 2021 Mar;17(12):e2006484
pubmed: 33577127
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 25;9(1):2336
pubmed: 30046032
Anal Chem. 2012 Sep 18;84(18):7954-62
pubmed: 22897670
Nat Commun. 2016 May 16;7:11556
pubmed: 27180912
Ultrasonics. 2008 Aug;48(4):279-96
pubmed: 18511095
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Aug;36(8):1364-75
pubmed: 20691925
ACS Omega. 2021 Feb 17;6(8):5670-5678
pubmed: 33681606
Biomacromolecules. 2014 May 12;15(5):1852-9
pubmed: 24716647
Ultrasonics. 2016 Aug;70:275-83
pubmed: 27261567
Lab Chip. 2012 Mar 21;12(6):1014-21
pubmed: 22349937