Preoperative Assessment of Language Dominance through Combined Resting-State and Task-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
brain mapping
data-driven analysis
language assessment
resting-state fMRI
task-based fMRI
Journal
Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Dec 2021
09 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
24
10
2021
revised:
03
12
2021
accepted:
07
12
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
25
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Brain lesions in language-related cortical areas remain a challenge in the clinical routine. In recent years, the resting-state fMRI (RS-fMRI) was shown to be a feasible method for preoperative language assessment. The aim of this study was to examine whether language-related resting-state components, which have been obtained using a data-driven independent-component-based identification algorithm, can be supportive in determining language dominance in the left or right hemisphere. Twenty patients suffering from brain lesions close to supposed language-relevant cortical areas were included. RS-fMRI and task-based (TB-fMRI) were performed for the purpose of preoperative language assessment. TB-fMRI included a verb generation task with an appropriate control condition (a syllable switching task) to decompose language-critical and language-supportive processes. Subsequently, the best fitting ICA component for the resting-state language network (RSLN) referential to general linear models (GLMs) of the TB-fMRI (including models with and without linguistic control conditions) was identified using an algorithm based on the Dice index. Thereby, the RSLNs associated with GLMs using a linguistic control condition led to significantly higher laterality indices than GLM baseline contrasts. LIs derived from GLM contrasts with and without control conditions alone did not differ significantly. In general, the results suggest that determining language dominance in the human brain is feasible both with TB-fMRI and RS-fMRI, and in particular, the combination of both approaches yields a higher specificity in preoperative language assessment. Moreover, we can conclude that the choice of the language mapping paradigm is crucial for the mentioned benefits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34945814
pii: jpm11121342
doi: 10.3390/jpm11121342
pmc: PMC8706548
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Neurosurgery. 2012 Aug;71(2):305-16; discussion 316
pubmed: 22517255
Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1214-22
pubmed: 15219593
Neuroimage. 2003 Jun;19(2 Pt 1):253-60
pubmed: 12814576
Neuroimage. 2006 May 1;30(4):1414-32
pubmed: 16413796
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1536-48
pubmed: 16632379
Neurosurg Rev. 2013 Apr;36(2):205-14; discussion 214
pubmed: 23187966
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Feb;28(2):E4
pubmed: 20121439
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):450-5
pubmed: 14741682
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):1233-9
pubmed: 12880848
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
pubmed: 12377157
Brain Lang. 2006 Jul;98(1):57-65
pubmed: 16519926
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):18-27
pubmed: 18172171
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jan 18;14:183-194
pubmed: 28180077
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Jun;17(3):463-8
pubmed: 9735909
Brain. 2000 Dec;123 Pt 12:2512-8
pubmed: 11099452
Neuroreport. 2005 Feb 28;16(3):285-8
pubmed: 15706237
Neurocase. 2002;8(3):205-9
pubmed: 12119315
Neural Comput. 1995 Nov;7(6):1129-59
pubmed: 7584893
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2684-91
pubmed: 22841989
Cortex. 2011 Nov-Dec;47(10):1266-9
pubmed: 21621765
Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6 Suppl):226-36
pubmed: 19934999
Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):971-8
pubmed: 18647847
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 24;1221:115-25
pubmed: 18555209
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Mar;35(3):1018-30
pubmed: 23288627
Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(8):979-92
pubmed: 16997067
Neuroimage. 2007 Nov 1;38(2):306-20
pubmed: 17869543
Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 May 14;4:13
pubmed: 20577591
Nature. 2007 May 3;447(7140):83-6
pubmed: 17476267
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Jun 15;163(1):128-36
pubmed: 17386945
Brain Lang. 2016 Apr-May;155-156:44-8
pubmed: 27108246
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):16039-44
pubmed: 18843113
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 7;106(27):11376-81
pubmed: 19549821
J Neurooncol. 1997 Sep;34(3):263-78
pubmed: 9258818
Neurosurgery. 2010 Jan;66(1):113-20
pubmed: 19935438
Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):522-30
pubmed: 16938470
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Apr;20(4):609-12
pubmed: 10319970
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jun;23(6):887-905
pubmed: 16649210
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e85880
pubmed: 24475058
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):700-11
pubmed: 17704812
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Feb 28;171(2):82-93
pubmed: 19185468
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2006;2006:49515
pubmed: 23165035
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Sep;20(8):1511-9
pubmed: 10512239
Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Jun 17;4:19
pubmed: 20592951
Neurosurgery. 2013 Dec;73(6):969-82; discussion 982-3
pubmed: 24264234
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Feb 01;10:11
pubmed: 26869899