Impact of Active Breaks in the Classroom on Mathematical Performance and Attention in Elementary School Children.
academic achievement
children
physical activity
school time
Journal
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Dec 2021
07 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
20
10
2021
revised:
02
12
2021
accepted:
04
12
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
25
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The increasing need to face the problem of sedentarism, especially in the COVID-19 era, induced teachers and researchers to find new intervention methodologies in school context. Active breaks (ABs) include brief periods of physical activity as a part of the curriculum. This study aimed to investigate the AB acute responses on attentive skills and mathematical performance and attention in a primary school. A total of 141 children (aged 9.61 ± 0.82), divided into six classes, participated in this study. Each class was randomly assigned to three groups on the basis of the type of protocol performed during the three ABs scheduled in a school day: fitness (FIT), creativity (CREAT), and control group (CON). At baseline and at the end of interventions, all participants underwent the Stroop Color and Word test (SCWT) and the math test (MATH) to assess the level of attention and mathematical performance, respectively. The degree of enjoyment was evaluated through the modified Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale. The factorial ANOVA showed significant differences between the FIT and CON in MATH test ( This study showed a positive acute impact of AB interventions. FIT positively influenced attentive and math performances more than the CREAT, probably due to the correct work/rest ratio and executive rhythm that allowed children to reach a good level of exertion. This report showed that ABs can be a useful and productive activity to be performed between curricular lessons.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The increasing need to face the problem of sedentarism, especially in the COVID-19 era, induced teachers and researchers to find new intervention methodologies in school context. Active breaks (ABs) include brief periods of physical activity as a part of the curriculum. This study aimed to investigate the AB acute responses on attentive skills and mathematical performance and attention in a primary school.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 141 children (aged 9.61 ± 0.82), divided into six classes, participated in this study. Each class was randomly assigned to three groups on the basis of the type of protocol performed during the three ABs scheduled in a school day: fitness (FIT), creativity (CREAT), and control group (CON). At baseline and at the end of interventions, all participants underwent the Stroop Color and Word test (SCWT) and the math test (MATH) to assess the level of attention and mathematical performance, respectively. The degree of enjoyment was evaluated through the modified Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The factorial ANOVA showed significant differences between the FIT and CON in MATH test (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed a positive acute impact of AB interventions. FIT positively influenced attentive and math performances more than the CREAT, probably due to the correct work/rest ratio and executive rhythm that allowed children to reach a good level of exertion. This report showed that ABs can be a useful and productive activity to be performed between curricular lessons.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34946415
pii: healthcare9121689
doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121689
pmc: PMC8701340
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 28;17(23):
pubmed: 33260584
Dev Psychol. 2012 Sep;48(5):1501-10
pubmed: 22148945
Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2019;17(2):153-178
pubmed: 31289454
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Jan;109(1):158-165
pubmed: 31168863
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Sep;20(9):841-848
pubmed: 28185806
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Nov;111(5):1497-504
pubmed: 21836048
J Sch Health. 2011 Aug;81(8):455-61
pubmed: 21740430
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;53(22):1397-1404
pubmed: 30737201
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248345
pubmed: 33720968
Physiol Behav. 2017 Aug 1;177:135-147
pubmed: 28442333
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 1;179(3):323-34
pubmed: 24318278
Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 May;18(2):284-302
pubmed: 15587675
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 May;41(5):998-1005
pubmed: 19346988
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 24;19(1):633
pubmed: 31126278
Prog Neurobiol. 2010 Oct;92(2):134-50
pubmed: 20542078
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1197-222
pubmed: 27182986
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):959-64
pubmed: 21852486
Physiol Behav. 2018 Jul 1;191:21-28
pubmed: 29608999
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Jul;7(5):597-605
pubmed: 11459111
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75
pubmed: 28599680
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1560-70
pubmed: 21907811
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Apr;23(4):377-384
pubmed: 31722840
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Feb;13(2):198-206
pubmed: 26107532
Brain Res. 2012 May 9;1453:87-101
pubmed: 22480735
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 13;15(1):69
pubmed: 30001713
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009 Oct;31(5):640-56
pubmed: 20016113
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 04;7:1474
pubmed: 27757088
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999 May;5(4):346-56
pubmed: 10349297
Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1702-10
pubmed: 20006719
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jan;9(1):58-65
pubmed: 18094706
J Clin Psychol. 1976 Jul;32(3):654-8
pubmed: 956433
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):936
pubmed: 30064394
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(18):
pubmed: 32927849
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2017 Jan 16;10:37-45
pubmed: 28144155
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 03;18(11):
pubmed: 34204965