Chemical and Mechanical Characterization of Licorice Root and Palm Leaf Waste Incorporated into Poly(urethane-acrylate) (PUA).
Acrylic Resins
/ chemical synthesis
Arecaceae
/ chemistry
Biodegradation, Environmental
Cellulose
/ chemistry
Glycyrrhiza
/ chemistry
Molecular Structure
Particle Size
Plant Leaves
/ chemistry
Plant Roots
/ chemistry
Polymers
/ chemical synthesis
Polyurethanes
/ chemical synthesis
Temperature
Tensile Strength
licorice root
lignocellulosic materials
mechanical properties
oil palm leaf
poly(urethane-acrylate)
thermal properties
Journal
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Dec 2021
19 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
19
11
2021
revised:
13
12
2021
accepted:
16
12
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
15
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A poly(urethane-acrylate) polymer (PUA) was synthesized, and a sufficiently high molecular weight starting from urethane-acrylate oligomer (UAO) was obtained. PUA was then loaded with two types of powdered ligno-cellulosic waste, namely from licorice root and palm leaf, in amounts of 1, 5 and 10%, and the obtained composites were chemically and mechanically characterized. FTIR analysis of final PUA synthesized used for the composite production confirmed the new bonds formed during the polymerization process. The degradation temperatures of the two types of waste used were in line with what observed in most common natural fibers with an onset at 270 °C for licorice waste, and at 290 °C for palm leaf one. The former was more abundant in cellulose (44% vs. 12% lignin), whilst the latter was richer in lignin (30% vs. 26% cellulose). In the composites, only a limited reduction of degradation temperature was observed for palm leaf waste addition and some dispersion issues are observed for licorice root, leading to fluctuating results. Tensile performance of the composites indicates some reduction with respect to the pure polymer in terms of tensile strength, though stabilizing between data with 5 and 10% filler. In contrast, Shore A hardness of both composites slightly increases with higher filler content, while in stiffness-driven applications licorice-based composites showed potential due to an increase up to 50% compared to neat PUA. In general terms, the fracture surfaces tend to become rougher with filler introduction, which indicates the need for optimizing interfacial adhesion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34946764
pii: molecules26247682
doi: 10.3390/molecules26247682
pmc: PMC8705998
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acrylic Resins
0
Polymers
0
Polyurethanes
0
urethane acrylate
0
Cellulose
9004-34-6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Polymers (Basel). 2020 Apr 06;12(4):
pubmed: 32268549
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014 Apr 23;6(8):5726-34
pubmed: 24666422
Biomacromolecules. 2017 Apr 10;18(4):1322-1332
pubmed: 28287708
Waste Manag. 2021 Feb 1;120:538-548
pubmed: 33131999
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jan 23;6(1):181757
pubmed: 30800402
ACS Omega. 2019 Jul 23;4(7):12505-12511
pubmed: 31460370
Carbohydr Polym. 2012 Jan 4;87(1):397-404
pubmed: 34662980
Materials (Basel). 2017 Jul 28;10(8):
pubmed: 28773234