A Precise Method to Evaluate 360 Degree Measures of Optic Cup and Disc Morphology in an African American Cohort and Its Genetic Applications.
Adult
Black or African American
/ statistics & numerical data
Case-Control Studies
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Glaucoma, Open-Angle
/ diagnosis
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
/ methods
Membrane Proteins
/ genetics
Optic Disk
/ diagnostic imaging
Optic Nerve
/ diagnostic imaging
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Visual Fields
African Americans
cup-to-disc ratio
genetic associations with cup-to-disc ratio
glaucoma
optic nerve
stereo disc images
Journal
Genes
ISSN: 2073-4425
Titre abrégé: Genes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101551097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 12 2021
09 12 2021
Historique:
received:
15
11
2021
revised:
01
12
2021
accepted:
05
12
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
17
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: Vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) is an important measure for evaluating damage to the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. However, this measure often does not fully capture the irregular cupping observed in glaucomatous nerves. We developed and evaluated a method to measure cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) at all 360 degrees of the ONH. (2) Methods: Non-physician graders from the Scheie Reading Center outlined the cup and disc on digital stereo color disc images from African American patients enrolled in the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study. After converting the resultant coordinates into polar representation, the CDR at each 360-degree location of the ONH was obtained. We compared grader VCDR values with clinical VCDR values, using Spearman correlation analysis, and validated significant genetic associations with clinical VCDR, using grader VCDR values. (3) Results: Graders delineated outlines of the cup contour and disc boundaries twice in each of 1815 stereo disc images. For both cases and controls, the mean CDR was highest at the horizontal bisector, particularly in the temporal region, as compared to other degree locations. There was a good correlation between grader CDR at the vertical bisector and clinical VCDR (Spearman Correlation OD: r = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.76-0.79]). An SNP in the
Identifiants
pubmed: 34946910
pii: genes12121961
doi: 10.3390/genes12121961
pmc: PMC8701339
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
MPDZ protein, human
0
Membrane Proteins
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : P30 EY001583
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY023557
Pays : United States
Références
Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1367-77
pubmed: 21453963
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Sep 22;2:16067
pubmed: 27654570
Ophthalmology. 1994 Oct;101(10):1662-7
pubmed: 7936564
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 Jan;101(1):23-32
pubmed: 20546966
J Neurosci Res. 2002 Apr 1;68(1):97-106
pubmed: 11933054
Eye (Lond). 2019 May;33(5):838-844
pubmed: 30635643
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jan;49(1):66-76
pubmed: 18172076
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Jun;32(6):1019-32
pubmed: 23434609
Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Jan 15;21(2):437-45
pubmed: 21984434
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1976;74:532-72
pubmed: 867638
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0209409
pubmed: 30629635
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:2626-9
pubmed: 22254880
Ophthalmology. 1992 Feb;99(2):215-21
pubmed: 1553210
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2014 Jun;70(3):79-88
pubmed: 25032792
JAMA. 1991 Jul 17;266(3):369-74
pubmed: 2056646
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;25(1):1-12
pubmed: 28532207
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 Jul;20(4):265-73
pubmed: 10962691
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:2266-9
pubmed: 19163151
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):711-20
pubmed: 25576993
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:177-84; discussion 184-5
pubmed: 11797305
J Glaucoma. 2015 Apr-May;24(4):262-6
pubmed: 20616749
Ophthalmology. 1988 Mar;95(3):350-6
pubmed: 3174002
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 Jul;29(7):1151-8
pubmed: 3417404
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Oct;41(11):3309-21
pubmed: 11006219
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16(Pt 2):75-82
pubmed: 24579126
Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):742-6
pubmed: 21055815
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;48(4):1665-73
pubmed: 17389498
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993 Oct;13(4):383-6
pubmed: 8278191
Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Dec;98(12):2172-7
pubmed: 7447769
Ophthalmology. 1998 Aug;105(8):1557-63
pubmed: 9709774
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Dec;47(12):5348-55
pubmed: 17122123
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):748-58
pubmed: 22218146
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1976 Dec;54(6):804-18
pubmed: 990030
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Nov;29(11):1860-9
pubmed: 20562037
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;24(2):130-140
pubmed: 28102741
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;124(11):1579-83
pubmed: 17102005
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):930-8
pubmed: 27016459
J Glaucoma. 2016 Feb;25(2):198-202
pubmed: 25827299
Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):717-23
pubmed: 20045571
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct 04;14:118
pubmed: 25281998
Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Jan;100(1):135-46
pubmed: 7055464
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):701-13; discussion 829-30
pubmed: 12049574
Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;132(6):836-44
pubmed: 11730646
Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Jan;109(1):77-83
pubmed: 1987954