Long-term survival of patients with stage II and III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with inadequate nodal assessment.
Gastrectomy
Gastric Cancer
Lymphadenectomy
N stage
Staging
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
Journal
World journal of gastrointestinal surgery
ISSN: 1948-9366
Titre abrégé: World J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532473
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Nov 2021
27 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
28
04
2021
revised:
30
06
2021
accepted:
22
10
2021
entrez:
24
12
2021
pubmed:
25
12
2021
medline:
25
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gastric cancer is an aggressive disease with frequent lymph node (LN) involvement. The NCCN recommends a D2 lymphadenectomy and the harvesting of at least 16 LNs. This threshold has been the subject of great debate, not only for the extent of surgery but also for more appropriate staging. The reclassification of stage IIB through IIIC based on N3b nodal staging in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system highlights the efforts to more accurately discriminate survival expectancy based on nodal number. Furthermore, studies have suggested that pathologic assessment of 30 or more LNs improve prognostic accuracy and is required for proper staging of gastric cancer. To evaluate the long-term survival of advanced gastric cancer patients who deviated from expected survival curves because of inadequate nodal evaluation. Eligible patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Those with stage II-III gastric cancer were considered for inclusion. Three groups were compared based on the number of analyzed LNs. They were inadequate LN assessment (ILA, < 16 LNs), adequate LN assessment (ALA, 16-29 LNs), and optimal LN assessment (OLA, ≥ 30 LNs). The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival. Data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method, log-rank test, hazard risk, and Cox proportional univariate and multivariate models. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the ALA and OLA groups. The analysis included 11607 patients. Most had advanced T stages (T3 = 48%; T4 = 42%). The pathological AJCC stage distribution was IIA = 22%, IIB = 18%, IIIA = 26%, IIIB = 22%, and IIIC = 12%. The overall sample divided by the study objective included ILA (50%), ALA (35%), and OLA (15%). Median OS was 24 mo for the ILA group, 29 mo for the ALA group, and 34 mo for the OLA group ( Proper nodal staging is a critical issue in gastric cancer. Assessment of an inadequate number of LNs places patients at high risk of adverse long-term survival outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Gastric cancer is an aggressive disease with frequent lymph node (LN) involvement. The NCCN recommends a D2 lymphadenectomy and the harvesting of at least 16 LNs. This threshold has been the subject of great debate, not only for the extent of surgery but also for more appropriate staging. The reclassification of stage IIB through IIIC based on N3b nodal staging in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system highlights the efforts to more accurately discriminate survival expectancy based on nodal number. Furthermore, studies have suggested that pathologic assessment of 30 or more LNs improve prognostic accuracy and is required for proper staging of gastric cancer.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the long-term survival of advanced gastric cancer patients who deviated from expected survival curves because of inadequate nodal evaluation.
METHODS
METHODS
Eligible patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Those with stage II-III gastric cancer were considered for inclusion. Three groups were compared based on the number of analyzed LNs. They were inadequate LN assessment (ILA, < 16 LNs), adequate LN assessment (ALA, 16-29 LNs), and optimal LN assessment (OLA, ≥ 30 LNs). The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival. Data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method, log-rank test, hazard risk, and Cox proportional univariate and multivariate models. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the ALA and OLA groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The analysis included 11607 patients. Most had advanced T stages (T3 = 48%; T4 = 42%). The pathological AJCC stage distribution was IIA = 22%, IIB = 18%, IIIA = 26%, IIIB = 22%, and IIIC = 12%. The overall sample divided by the study objective included ILA (50%), ALA (35%), and OLA (15%). Median OS was 24 mo for the ILA group, 29 mo for the ALA group, and 34 mo for the OLA group (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Proper nodal staging is a critical issue in gastric cancer. Assessment of an inadequate number of LNs places patients at high risk of adverse long-term survival outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34950434
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1463
pmc: PMC8649557
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1463-1483Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests.
Références
Ann Surg. 2016 Jul;264(1):114-20
pubmed: 26945155
J Gastric Cancer. 2017 Sep;17(3):212-219
pubmed: 28970951
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr;224(4):546-555
pubmed: 28017807
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jan 5;84(1):64-71
pubmed: 11139315
Cancer. 2006 Nov 1;107(9):2143-51
pubmed: 17001662
Gastric Cancer. 2012 Sep;15 Suppl 1:S70-88
pubmed: 22895615
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Dec;12(12):981-7
pubmed: 16244801
Stat Med. 2011 May 20;30(11):1292-301
pubmed: 21337595
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2019 Oct 22;31(1):2
pubmed: 32372269
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Dec;17(12):3077-9
pubmed: 20882416
Ann Oncol. 2009 May;20(5):897-905
pubmed: 19179553