Empirical Second-Line Therapy in 5000 Patients of the European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management (Hp-EuReg).
Adult
Amoxicillin
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Bismuth
Clarithromycin
/ therapeutic use
Drug Therapy, Combination
Helicobacter Infections
/ drug therapy
Helicobacter pylori
Humans
Levofloxacin
Moxifloxacin
/ therapeutic use
Penicillins
/ adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Proton Pump Inhibitors
Quinolones
/ therapeutic use
Registries
Tetracycline
/ therapeutic use
Bismuth
Clarithromycin
Helicobacter pylori
Levofloxacin
Rescue
Journal
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
ISSN: 1542-7714
Titre abrégé: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160775
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
05
11
2021
accepted:
14
12
2021
pubmed:
27
12
2021
medline:
28
9
2022
entrez:
26
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
After a first Helicobacter pylori eradication attempt, approximately 20% of patients will remain infected. The aim of the current study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of second-line empiric treatment in Europe. This international, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional registry aimed to evaluate the decisions and outcomes of H pylori management by European gastroenterologists. All infected adult cases with a previous eradication treatment attempt were registered with the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology-Research Electronic Data Capture until February 2021. Patients allergic to penicillin and those who received susceptibility-guided therapy were excluded. Data monitoring was performed to ensure data quality. Overall, 5055 patients received empiric second-line treatment. Triple therapy with amoxicillin and levofloxacin was prescribed most commonly (33%). The overall effectiveness was 82% by modified intention-to-treat analysis and 83% in the per-protocol population. After failure of first-line clarithromycin-containing treatment, optimal eradication (>90%) was obtained with moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy or levofloxacin-containing quadruple therapy (with bismuth). In patients receiving triple therapy containing levofloxacin or moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple treatment, cure rates were optimized with 14-day regimens using high doses of proton pump inhibitors. However, 3-in-1 single capsule or levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple therapy produced reliable eradication rates regardless of proton pump inhibitor dose, duration of therapy, or previous first-line treatment. The overall incidence of adverse events was 28%, and most (85%) were mild. Three patients developed serious adverse events (0.3%) requiring hospitalization. Empiric second-line regimens including 14-day quinolone triple therapies, 14-day levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple therapy, 14-day tetracycline-bismuth classic quadruple therapy, and 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy (as a single capsule) provided optimal effectiveness. However, many other second-line treatments evaluated reported low eradication rates. ClincialTrials.gov number: NCT02328131.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND & AIMS
After a first Helicobacter pylori eradication attempt, approximately 20% of patients will remain infected. The aim of the current study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of second-line empiric treatment in Europe.
METHODS
This international, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional registry aimed to evaluate the decisions and outcomes of H pylori management by European gastroenterologists. All infected adult cases with a previous eradication treatment attempt were registered with the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology-Research Electronic Data Capture until February 2021. Patients allergic to penicillin and those who received susceptibility-guided therapy were excluded. Data monitoring was performed to ensure data quality.
RESULTS
Overall, 5055 patients received empiric second-line treatment. Triple therapy with amoxicillin and levofloxacin was prescribed most commonly (33%). The overall effectiveness was 82% by modified intention-to-treat analysis and 83% in the per-protocol population. After failure of first-line clarithromycin-containing treatment, optimal eradication (>90%) was obtained with moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy or levofloxacin-containing quadruple therapy (with bismuth). In patients receiving triple therapy containing levofloxacin or moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple treatment, cure rates were optimized with 14-day regimens using high doses of proton pump inhibitors. However, 3-in-1 single capsule or levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple therapy produced reliable eradication rates regardless of proton pump inhibitor dose, duration of therapy, or previous first-line treatment. The overall incidence of adverse events was 28%, and most (85%) were mild. Three patients developed serious adverse events (0.3%) requiring hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS
Empiric second-line regimens including 14-day quinolone triple therapies, 14-day levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple therapy, 14-day tetracycline-bismuth classic quadruple therapy, and 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy (as a single capsule) provided optimal effectiveness. However, many other second-line treatments evaluated reported low eradication rates. ClincialTrials.gov number: NCT02328131.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34954341
pii: S1542-3565(21)01349-5
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.025
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Penicillins
0
Proton Pump Inhibitors
0
Quinolones
0
Levofloxacin
6GNT3Y5LMF
Amoxicillin
804826J2HU
Tetracycline
F8VB5M810T
Clarithromycin
H1250JIK0A
Bismuth
U015TT5I8H
Moxifloxacin
U188XYD42P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02328131']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2243-2257Investigateurs
Giulia Fiorinni
(G)
Ilaria Maria Saracino
(IM)
Manuel Pabon Carrasco
(MP)
Alma Keco Huerga
(AK)
Enrique Alfaro Almajano
(EA)
Samuel Jesus Martinez Dominguez
(SJ)
Horacio Alonso Galan
(HA)
Benito Velayos
(B)
Carmen Dueñas Sadornil
(CD)
Jose Maria Botargues Bote
(JM)
Pedro Luis Gonzalez-Cordero
(PL)
Miguel Areia
(M)
Blas Jose Gomez Rodriguez
(BJ)
Rinaldo Pellicano
(R)
Óscar Nuñez
(Ó)
Francesco Franceschi
(F)
Sergey Alekseenko
(S)
Monica Perona
(M)
Rustam Abdulkhakov
(R)
Manuel Dominguez-Cajal
(M)
Pedro Almela Notari
(PA)
Judith Gomez Camarero
(JG)
Manuel Jimenez Moreno
(MJ)
Alicia Algaba
(A)
Fernando Bermejo
(F)
Jose Maria Botargues Bote
(JM)
Javier Tejedor Tejada
(JT)
Elida Oblitas Susanibar
(EO)
Doron Boltin
(D)
Sotirios Georgopoulos
(S)
Colm OMorain
(C)
Asghar Qasim
(A)
Ian Beales
(I)
Natalia Bakulina
(N)
Galina Fadeenko
(G)
Peter Malfertheiner
(P)
Rosa Rosania
(R)
Tatiana Ilchishina
(T)
Pavel Bogomolov
(P)
Igor Bakulin
(I)
Oleg Zaytsev
(O)
Antonietta Gerarda Gravina
(AG)
Marco Romano
(M)
Alfredo Di Leo
(A)
Giuseppe Losurdo
(G)
Ludmila Grigorieva
(L)
Pedro Delgado Guillena
(PD)
Marinko Marusic
(M)
Dragan Jurcic
(D)
Natalia Nikolaevna Dekhnich
(NN)
Eduardo Iyo
(E)
Luisa Carmen de la Peña Negro
(LC)
Natalia Baryshnikova
(N)
Natalia Bakanova
(N)
Halis Simsek
(H)
Cem Simsek
(C)
Oleksiy Gridnyev
(O)
Miguel Fernandez-Bermejo
(M)
Teresa Angueira
(T)
Rafael Ruiz-Zorrilla Lopez
(R)
Barbara Gomez
(B)
Mila Kovacheva-Slavova
(M)
Adi Lahat
(A)
Javier Alcedo
(J)
Ana Campillo
(A)
Liya Nikolaevna Belousova
(LN)
Ramon Pajares Villarroya
(RP)
Neven Ljubicic
(N)
Marko Nikolic
(M)
Jesús M González-Santiago
(JM)
Diego Burgos Santamaría
(DB)
Anna Pakhomova
(A)
Izabela Sekulic-Spasic
(I)
Matteo Ghisa
(M)
Fabio Farinati
(F)
Sabir Irfan Sagdati
(SI)
Nikola Panic
(N)
Frederic Heluwaert
(F)
Edurne Amorena
(E)
Leticia Moreira
(L)
Gloria Fernandez Esparrach
(GF)
Ekaterina Yuryevna Plotnikova
(EY)
Michal Kukla
(M)
Victor Kamburov
(V)
Luis Javier Lamuela Calvo
(LJ)
Ivan Rankovic
(I)
Antonio Cuadrado Lavín
(AC)
Yolanda Arguedas Lazaro
(YA)
Victor Gonzalez Carrera Agnieszka Dobrowolska
(VG)
Piotr Eder
(P)
Alla Kononova
(A)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.