Surgical Outcomes in High-risk Prostate Cancer and Salvage Radical Prostatectomy.


Journal

The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ
ISSN: 1565-1088
Titre abrégé: Isr Med Assoc J
Pays: Israel
ID NLM: 100930740

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
entrez: 26 12 2021
pubmed: 27 12 2021
medline: 5 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with high-risk prostate cancer are at higher risk of treatment failure, development of metastatic disease, and mortality. There is no consensus on the treatment of choice for these patients, and either radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is recommended. Surgery is less common as the initial treatment for high-risk patients, possibly reflecting the concerns regarding morbidity as well as oncological and functional outcomes. Another high-risk group includes patients with failure of previous EBRT or focal treatment. For these patients, salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) can be offered. To describe our experience with surgery of high-risk patients and SRP. This cohort included all high-risk patients undergoing RP or SRP at our institution between January 2012 and December 2019. We reviewed the electronic medical charts and collected pathological, functional, and oncological outcomes. Our cohort included 39 patients; average age was 67.8 years, and average follow-up duration was 40.9 months. The most common postoperative morbidity was transfusion of packed cells. There were no life-threatening events or postoperative mortality. Continence was preserved (zero to one pad) in 76% of the patients. Twenty-three patients (59%) had undetectable prostate specific antigen levels following the surgery, 11 (30%) were treated with either adjuvant or salvage EBRT, and 12 patients (31%) were found with no evidence of disease and no additional treatment was needed. Radical prostatectomy and SRP are safe options for patients presenting with high-risk prostate cancer, with good functional and oncological outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with high-risk prostate cancer are at higher risk of treatment failure, development of metastatic disease, and mortality. There is no consensus on the treatment of choice for these patients, and either radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is recommended. Surgery is less common as the initial treatment for high-risk patients, possibly reflecting the concerns regarding morbidity as well as oncological and functional outcomes. Another high-risk group includes patients with failure of previous EBRT or focal treatment. For these patients, salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) can be offered.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To describe our experience with surgery of high-risk patients and SRP.
METHODS METHODS
This cohort included all high-risk patients undergoing RP or SRP at our institution between January 2012 and December 2019. We reviewed the electronic medical charts and collected pathological, functional, and oncological outcomes.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our cohort included 39 patients; average age was 67.8 years, and average follow-up duration was 40.9 months. The most common postoperative morbidity was transfusion of packed cells. There were no life-threatening events or postoperative mortality. Continence was preserved (zero to one pad) in 76% of the patients. Twenty-three patients (59%) had undetectable prostate specific antigen levels following the surgery, 11 (30%) were treated with either adjuvant or salvage EBRT, and 12 patients (31%) were found with no evidence of disease and no additional treatment was needed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Radical prostatectomy and SRP are safe options for patients presenting with high-risk prostate cancer, with good functional and oncological outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34954916

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

777-782

Auteurs

Yuval Avda (Y)

Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Jonathan Modai (J)

Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Igal Shpunt (I)

Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Michael Dinerman (M)

Department of Oncology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Yaniv Shilo (Y)

Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Roy Croock (R)

Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Morad Jaber (M)

Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Uri Linder (U)

Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Dan Leibovici (D)

Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH