A social perspective on resilience: social support and dyadic coping in teacher training.

Coping strategies Dyadic coping Relational resilience Social support Teacher training

Journal

Empirical research in vocational education and training
ISSN: 1877-6345
Titre abrégé: Empir Res Vocat Educ Train
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918284165506676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 17 05 2021
accepted: 19 11 2021
entrez: 27 12 2021
pubmed: 28 12 2021
medline: 28 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stress in teaching and teacher training is a well-known issue and stress management during teacher training may not only be affected by individual coping efforts, but also determined by private and work-related networks the individual is integrated in. In that regard, our article aims firstly to identify sources of social support in the German teacher training system and secondly to analyze interdependencies in dyadic coping interactions based on the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. On the basis of questionnaire data from 307 German trainees and qualified teachers from vocational and general schools, we found that mentors, partners, fellow trainees, colleagues at school, parents, and good friends were named as the most supportive reference persons during teacher training. In a follow-up survey, data from 49 sources of support were obtained, which could be assigned to the corresponding (trainee) teachers (in the sense of support recipients). These dyads thus form the basis for the analysis of dyadic coping interdependencies. The results of the moderator analyses show, among other things, that support recipients who prefer the coping strategy palliative emotion regulation tend to react rather sensitively to contrary coping strategies of the source of support with regard to their stress symptoms. Social interactions in this respect can represent both protective as well as risk factors. Therefore, a system of complex social interdependencies must be considered when analyzing relational resilience among prospective teachers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34956423
doi: 10.1186/s40461-021-00126-y
pii: 126
pmc: PMC8685166
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

24

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 12;12:687512
pubmed: 34322067
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:571
pubmed: 30971968
Psychosom Med. 1993 May-Jun;55(3):234-47
pubmed: 8346332
Br J Educ Psychol. 1999 Dec;69 ( Pt 4):517-31
pubmed: 10665167
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Mar;54(3):466-75
pubmed: 3361419
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Oct;42(10):1129-48
pubmed: 15350854
Child Dev. 2000 May-Jun;71(3):543-62
pubmed: 10953923
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745-74
pubmed: 14744233
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 14;14(1):e0210668
pubmed: 30640925
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Aug;54(4):416-23
pubmed: 3745593
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 06;12:619912
pubmed: 34295278

Auteurs

Tobias Kärner (T)

Chair of Economic and Business Education (560A), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 47, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.

Julia Katharina Weiß (JK)

Chair of Economic and Business Education (560A), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 47, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.

Karin Heinrichs (K)

University of Education Upper Austria, Kaplanhofstr. 40, 4020 Linz, Austria.

Classifications MeSH